=SuscipeMeDomine;10279302]Do you think the relationship is different after confirmation than it was after baptism? How?
Speaking I assume od adults here?
Each sacrament provides the Grace of that patricular sacrament. In the sense that ALL sacraments are a potential sourse for Grace; they are the same. But each Sacrament exist for it’s primary purpose.
Baptism for the removal of Original Sin and critically important, membership ito the family of God. {yes I do do all the other things as well

]
Confirmation takes one to the next level so to speak. It stregthens; encourages; provides the Gifts of the HS, and demands [dare I say???] a “more active” or perhpas; better yet; a pro-active response, than that which exist in Baptism; but is a more dormant manner. When I think of Confirmation the one word of Christ that comes to mind most often is GO!

Matt 28:19-20
It’s not a matter of “More”, but different Grace aimed at its own commitment; and that comitment being more pro-active; more outward than baptism’s inner workings. YES they do overlap. Yes in some ways they are the same; and yes Baptism too calls for the same type of commitment.
But it SEEMS TO ME; that Baptism is sort of take care of yourself first; then Go… while Confirmation building on the foundation of Baptism and the Eucharist; is a more direct charge to Live and TO SHARE our Faith.
Gosh, I hope I’m making a degree of sense here:shrug:
And yet infants can be confirmed as well as baptized. In the Eastern church that’s the norm. In the Western church it can be done in danger of death. Since infants can’t make a commitment, the theology of the sacrament can’t demand one.
I would point out that the one set of keys was handed to Peter

It’s certainly not wrong; but is it better? NOT IMO.
Consider this section from the Catechism:
1308 Although Confirmation is sometimes called the “sacrament of Christian maturity,” we must not confuse adult faith with the adult age of natural growth, nor forget that the baptismal grace is a grace of free, unmerited election and does not need “ratification” to become effective.
1298
When Confirmation is celebrated separately from Baptism, as is the case in the Roman Rite, the Liturgy of Confirmation begins with the renewal of baptismal promises and the profession of faith by the confirmands. This clearly shows that Confirmation follows Baptism. When adults are baptized, they immediately receive Confirmation and participate in the Eucharist.
As this is a issue of “Church practice” its changable. The question then would seem to be that IF Rome thought the Eastern led to more souls being saved; Rome would morally be obligated to chage it. Yes?
1309 Preparation for Confirmation should aim at leading the Christian toward a more intimate union with Christ and a more lively familiarity with the Holy Spirit - his actions, his gifts, and his biddings - in order to be more capable of assuming the apostolic responsibilities of Christian life. To this end catechesis for Confirmation should strive to awaken a sense of belonging to the Church of Jesus Christ, the universal Church as well as the parish community. The latter bears special responsibility for the preparation of confirmands.
I’m enjoying our debate; God forbit someone should think we are arguing
God Bless,
pat/PJM