S
ssms27
Guest
I started the attending RCIA a few weeks ago. The first two weeks were introductions and they went well and the first lesson was on Scripture and Tradition with a short overview of what Catholic’s believe. The class is run but a deacon within the Church.
My intention is spend the year thinking through the teaching of the Church and if all goes well the plan was to do my confirmation in the spring. I was Baptized Catholic but had a born again experience at 13 and attended Protestant churches since. I’ve been considering going to RCIA for a number of years and have read numerous books on the topic over the years.
So I was a bit disappointed by the first lesson where the Deacon leading the class made a few assertions.
First he asked is the Church bible based. My answer was yes in light of the fact that Church is based on the word of God, which includes scripture and tradition. He said I was wrong and that the church is based on tradition, since the Bible is part of tradition, and wasn’t compiled until hundreds of years later.
Second he mentioned that apostles were unlearned, and the Church fathers were needed to clarify the meaning of scripture and instruct the church. He said they were so smart compared to the disciples that they barely needed the Holy Spirit. Not really sure what he though of Luke, John, and Paul but I didn’t feel like asking.
The second thing he said I would suspect would be contradicted but the Church fathers themselves along with the Church magesterium.
The first is a bit of a more nuanced discussion but I didn’t feel like the Deacon was prepared to have that discussion so I let it go.
Does this sound like a typical RCIA class ? I was hoping for more but will give it another chance.
My intention is spend the year thinking through the teaching of the Church and if all goes well the plan was to do my confirmation in the spring. I was Baptized Catholic but had a born again experience at 13 and attended Protestant churches since. I’ve been considering going to RCIA for a number of years and have read numerous books on the topic over the years.
So I was a bit disappointed by the first lesson where the Deacon leading the class made a few assertions.
First he asked is the Church bible based. My answer was yes in light of the fact that Church is based on the word of God, which includes scripture and tradition. He said I was wrong and that the church is based on tradition, since the Bible is part of tradition, and wasn’t compiled until hundreds of years later.
Second he mentioned that apostles were unlearned, and the Church fathers were needed to clarify the meaning of scripture and instruct the church. He said they were so smart compared to the disciples that they barely needed the Holy Spirit. Not really sure what he though of Luke, John, and Paul but I didn’t feel like asking.
The second thing he said I would suspect would be contradicted but the Church fathers themselves along with the Church magesterium.
The first is a bit of a more nuanced discussion but I didn’t feel like the Deacon was prepared to have that discussion so I let it go.
Does this sound like a typical RCIA class ? I was hoping for more but will give it another chance.