C
cheezey
Guest
I could really use others’ thoughts.
My first two RCIA classes were two or three readings from the Bible, discussion, done. Disappointing.
It took a lot of effort to even get into RCIA. After an admonishment from the diocese office, the Deacon finally called. But we ended up discussing my immediate housing issues, and was told I’d be contacted by the RCIA person shortly. It took almost another month. I had a disappointing meeting; nothing informative was said, she took no notes regarding baptism where & where, etc. We were to meet again, but I ended up in the hospital and missed it. She called shortly after I arrived home; her tone was “I am washing my hands of this” and her words were, “Well, now you have to follow up with the Deacon because I am going out of town til Palm Sunday.” I did, we met, and it turned out to be my first class. I had wanted the inquiry process to continue instead. And, after all this time, I was very unsure of this parish, having been told by another priest that this one is very disorganized.
In the last two classes, he has referenced negatives about non Catholic Christians; I know he is there to teach Catholicism, that is why I am there! but to speak so ill of my inherited faith was off putting to say the least. It wasn’t even in support of why the Catholic Church is the true church or anything theological. “We’ll need to meet a couple of times in the summer; we can’t lose you to them…”
Yikes. I am still one of them!!! And this week, I calmly said so.
But, also, this is the deacon who offered to help with my move and bailed the afternoon before, leaving me stranded. No warning. He sat on a document that I needed to procure the space for six weeks, nearly costing me the rental. No explanation. If he’s the teacher, then he, too, sat on all my inquiries of RCIA for those three months. No explanation.
I don’t feel awkward for this, but for being misled for that first class, and now the comments. And more so when I become the only student, as the other needs to take a long break.
I believe he should uphold the Catholic Church by telling me about the Church, not by admonishing the others. I admit, I am sensitive to this, having grown up with the animosity between the two.
It also seems that there should be more discussion of Church only theology; the Bible has been my reading all along. I’d think there’d be more “Why praying to Mary is NOT worshiping” type discussions. Certainly, if this is a year long process, we will not get through the Bible anyway, not at barely three chapters a week.
It is tempting to stop and go to another parish. I doubt I can go to the Monsignor because he didn’t care to help with making RCIA possible, either. In fact, he walked away from me in mid sentence.
The deacon hasn’t found a sponsor for me yet, either. This maybe, is understandable, but why I am not kept informed of my choice to learn and become?
Thoughts? Suggestions? Is this a typical way of teaching?
Sorry for being verbose, it’s just what I do.Trying, though…
was this the right forum to post?!!
My first two RCIA classes were two or three readings from the Bible, discussion, done. Disappointing.
It took a lot of effort to even get into RCIA. After an admonishment from the diocese office, the Deacon finally called. But we ended up discussing my immediate housing issues, and was told I’d be contacted by the RCIA person shortly. It took almost another month. I had a disappointing meeting; nothing informative was said, she took no notes regarding baptism where & where, etc. We were to meet again, but I ended up in the hospital and missed it. She called shortly after I arrived home; her tone was “I am washing my hands of this” and her words were, “Well, now you have to follow up with the Deacon because I am going out of town til Palm Sunday.” I did, we met, and it turned out to be my first class. I had wanted the inquiry process to continue instead. And, after all this time, I was very unsure of this parish, having been told by another priest that this one is very disorganized.
In the last two classes, he has referenced negatives about non Catholic Christians; I know he is there to teach Catholicism, that is why I am there! but to speak so ill of my inherited faith was off putting to say the least. It wasn’t even in support of why the Catholic Church is the true church or anything theological. “We’ll need to meet a couple of times in the summer; we can’t lose you to them…”
Yikes. I am still one of them!!! And this week, I calmly said so.
But, also, this is the deacon who offered to help with my move and bailed the afternoon before, leaving me stranded. No warning. He sat on a document that I needed to procure the space for six weeks, nearly costing me the rental. No explanation. If he’s the teacher, then he, too, sat on all my inquiries of RCIA for those three months. No explanation.
I don’t feel awkward for this, but for being misled for that first class, and now the comments. And more so when I become the only student, as the other needs to take a long break.
I believe he should uphold the Catholic Church by telling me about the Church, not by admonishing the others. I admit, I am sensitive to this, having grown up with the animosity between the two.
It also seems that there should be more discussion of Church only theology; the Bible has been my reading all along. I’d think there’d be more “Why praying to Mary is NOT worshiping” type discussions. Certainly, if this is a year long process, we will not get through the Bible anyway, not at barely three chapters a week.
It is tempting to stop and go to another parish. I doubt I can go to the Monsignor because he didn’t care to help with making RCIA possible, either. In fact, he walked away from me in mid sentence.
The deacon hasn’t found a sponsor for me yet, either. This maybe, is understandable, but why I am not kept informed of my choice to learn and become?
Thoughts? Suggestions? Is this a typical way of teaching?
Sorry for being verbose, it’s just what I do.Trying, though…
was this the right forum to post?!!