Reading Sacred Scripture

  • Thread starter Thread starter mymamamary
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
M

mymamamary

Guest
Dear Forum!!

I just recieved a Bible that was bought for me by TimothyH, so a big shout of thanks to TimothyH for the Bible. It is the 2nd RSV edition. I want to read Sacred Scripture, but i’ve made the mistake before of trying to read cover to cover. Needless to say, I got bogged down in Leviticus. Can I please get some Bible Reading plans, on how to read Sacred Scripture, some reliabe and good plans, I want to incorporate prayer as well as study into my reading. Also, I want to do some solo Bible Study, Can i get some tips on how to study the Bible Solo? I need some tips, pointers and plans and would very much appreciate your help in giving me some ideas!!

Thank you so much!!!

Once again, Thank you to TimothyH!! 😃
 
My suggestion is to start with the Gospel of John.

Have you heard of Lectio Divina? It is an excellent way to pray Scripture! For instance, you can focus on an upcoming reading for Sunday.

Google Lectio Divina and it will be explained to you. The passage you choose should be read slowly four times, and pondered as directed in the explanation.
 
I think that most people find the gospels are the easiest place to start. If you start with one of the synoptic gospels I would suggest skipping to John next. Some people find it a bit tedious reading the three synoptic gospels back to back. Acts of the Apostles is also very interesting. It makes sense to read it after reading one or more of the gospels. The epistles are are good and should not be overlooked, but it may not be easy to read them all back to back.

For the OT, sounds like you have already read Gen. and Exo. You may want to start with them if it has been awhile. The last three books of Moses/the Torah are a bit tedious. There are a lot of temple laws and laws on sacrifices. My other OT favorites include Samuel 1&2 (covers Samuel, Saul, David, etc.), Daniel, Proverbs, and Sirach.

Some people prefer reading the NT first, some like reading the OT first, and others like skipping back and fourth. It’s a personal preference that you’ll figure out.

Good luck.👍
 
The method that I have used is to read 4 pages a day, over the course of a year this will complete the entire Bible. I recently came across a web-site that has a different plan, it combines daily readings from the Old Testament and the New Testament. The address of the web-site is readthecatholicbibleinayear.wordpress.com/

DGB
 
Have you ever thought of reading with the lectionary? I know I have found that this not only gets through most of the Bible in a three-year cycle, but it also provides a good prayer guide and connects your readings with the Church calender. I would suggest a book called A Guide to Prayer for All who Seek God if you were Protestant. Sorry, but I don’t know a Catholic equivalent.
 
Here is what I can offer…

First understand that the Bible tells a story, God’s plan of salvation. Some books of the Bible follow the plot, and others are supplemental to the plot. If we want to understand the story and follow the plot, if we want to find God’s plan, we have to know which books are narrative, part of the storyline, and which are supplemental to the storyline.

For example, Job is supplemental to Genesis. Think about that for a moment. Job is all the way back by the Psalms, but its proper place in the storyline is to supplement and further explain Genesis. When Job is read in the order it appears in the Bible, it interrupts the storyline. The problem is worse when people read Job outside of the context of Genesis and so struggle to undersand what it is about. Eventually they get bored and give up. They lost the storyline.

Many books are like this, supplemental to the narrative books but placed in the Bible out of order. The reason for this odd placement of the books is because books of the Bible are grouped by type of literature, not chronologically.

Leviticus is another perfect example. Leviticus is a training manual. The first half of it is a training manual for priests on how to perform temple worship, and the second half is to train ordinary Jews on how they were expected to behave. Leviticus is supplemental to Exodus, but it is placed several books later, after Deuteronomy! Until you read and understand Exodus, you should not attempt to read Leviticus, and it has to be read in the context of being supplemental to and deepening our understanding of Exodus. When it is read out of it’s proper context, which is Exodus, it is less easily understood, the storyline is lost, people get bored, and they give up reading.

So what are the narrative books of the Bible? What are the books which tell the story?

    • **Genesis **- early world and patriarchs
    • Exodus - Egypt, Moses, slavery, exodus
    • Numbers - Desert wanderings
    • Joshua - Conquest
    • Judges - The time of the Judges
    • **1 Samuel **- Royal kingdom
    • 2 Samuel - More royal kingdom
    • 1 Kings - More royal kingdom
    • 2 Kings - Divided Kingdom
    • **Ezekiel, Daniel, Baruch, and Judith **- Babylonian exile
    • Ezra - Return from exile
    • Nehemiah - Return from Exile
    • 1 Macabees - Hellenization of Israel and revolt against Greek rule
    • Luke - Messianic fulfillment
    • **Acts **- The Church
    Your mileage may vary. Some may argue about my choices. All the Gospels should be read, but these books, in general, tell the story. I recommend that the first time reader stick with these books, and leave the others alone for a while, and try to follow the storyline first.

    A few of the supplemental books are:
    • **Job: **Supplemental to Genesis, further explaining creation, man’s order in creation, and the his place relative to the creator.
    • Leviticus: Supplemental to Exodus. The law was given in Exodus. It is laid out in Leviticus. Leviticus 17 through 22 was called the Holiness Code, because it taught ordinary Jews how they were expected to behave.
    • Deuteronomy: Supplemental to Numbers. Deuteronomy actually means “Second Law” and it is basically three speeches by Moses. The end of Dueteronomy is Moses’ farewell speech right before he dies and Israel crosses over the Jordan into the promised land. Deuteronomy is supplemental to the desert wanderings in Numbers and leads us into the conquest of Joshua.
    • Pslams: Supplemental to 1 and 2 Samuel and 1 and 2 Kings. The Psalms are the prayers of King David during his joys and sorrows, triumphs and defeats.
    • 1 and 2 Chronicals: Supplemental to 2 Samuel and 1 and 2 Kings. They restate much of the same material, but it is in Samuel, Kings and Chronicals that we hear of the Mother of the King - HINT 😉
    • Sirach and Wisdom: Supplemental to 1 and 2 Maccabees.
    • Revelation: Supplemental to Acts. Don’t try to read Revelation until you have read and understand what comes before it, especially Daniel, Jeremiah and Ezekiel, and Acts. Revelation is at the end for a reason.
    So how do we actually set about reading the texts?

    We have to always keep in mind, pausing often to remember and to look back on what we have just read, looking for the senses of scripture, of which there are two; literal and spiritual.

    The literal sense of scripture is what the writer was trying to communicate. If I were to say to you that it is raining cats and dogs, you would not think that poodles and house cats were falling from the sky, but would understand my manner of speaking to be a modern euphamism for the fact that it is raining heavily, that there is a storm, possibly a flood, and that I could be wet.

    We have to try to understand the literal sense of scripture first. What was the writer trying to communicate? Who was the author? Who was his audience? What were their situation? Is the text poetry? Hebrew storytelling? History? How did the people live? Who were their rulers? Were they at war or peace. All of this gives us clues as to the literal sense of scripture, what the author was trying to communicate. For example, Paul’s letter to the Philipians was written to the Christans at Phillipi, which was basically a Roman military retirement community. Phillipians is full of military language. Once we realize that Paul’s audience has a military background, Phillipians is not only much more easily understood, but it comes alive!

    After we understand the literal sense of scripture, we can then start thinking about the spiritual senses of scripture. There are three spiritual senses which Catholics are taught to look for in Scripture:
    • **Allegorical Sense: **How does this text point to Christ?
    • Moral Sense: How does this text teach me to live as a Christian, to live as an adopted Son of God whom Jesus died for?
    • Eschatological Sense: How does this text point to the end times - heaven, hell, ressurection, judgement and my ultimate call to eternal beatitude.
    It’s very imporant that we don’t try to find the literal sense and stop there. We should always be on the lookout for the spiritual senses of scripture, especially the moral sense, which helps us live lives of virtue. Pause often and ask how this text points to Christ, how it points to my end, and how it teaches me to be a better disciple of Christ in my every day life.

    Lastly, here is my own experience, probably the most valuable thing that I can offer, which I have learned by struggling with the texts daily.

    Don’t.

    Don’t struggle. Don’t try to muscle your way through scripture. Don’t try too hard to figure it out. If you are struggling with a passage, or there seems to be conflicts, or if something doesn’t make sense, don’t try too hard to figure it out. Instead be at peace, and leave room for the Holy Spirit to work. Read slow, pause often, reflect on what you have read, pray it back to God, and if something is diffucult, pray about it and move on. God will give you light some day, if it is his will. Don’t struggle with scripture. Simply move on and allow the Holy Spirit room to work.

    Scripture is alive. St. Paul said that scripture has power. Allow the power of the Holy Spirit - that same Spirit which made Christ present in Mary’s womb and which the priest calls down to make Christ present in the Eucharist - allow that same spirit, the Third Person of the Trinity to come to you through the scriptures and to work inside of you the same way. Allow scripture to speak to you. Don’t try to muscle your way through it. Don’t try to take it apart like a car engine to figure out how it works. Give the Holy Spirit room to breathe.

    Read slowly, pause often, reflect on what you have read, close your eyes, and pray it back to God. And if you get the chance, get a copy of Sacred Reading by Michael Casey.

    -Tim-
 
Great Advice so far …

To add my 2 cents…Read one of the Gospels and Acts…
I like Matthew mainly for the sermon on the mount. Acts gives a nice overview of the early days and spread of the Church.
From there, read the rest of the Gospels…and then the letters - basically all of the NT except Revelation
Leave Revelation alone for now…It’s a difficult read and there is so much that is easier and more profitable…

The OT is mainly support for the NT. So don’t worry about feeling the need to read it all.
Definitely look at Psalms, Wisdom and Proverbs are good and generally easy reads.

After that, just see where your interests take you…

That said…

I like the suggestion above of linking your readings with the Lectionary…It can help tie together the different parts of Scripture for you…

Peace
James
 
Dear Forum!!

I just recieved a Bible that was bought for me by TimothyH, so a big shout of thanks to TimothyH for the Bible. It is the 2nd RSV edition. I want to read Sacred Scripture, but i’ve made the mistake before of trying to read cover to cover. Needless to say, I got bogged down in Leviticus. Can I please get some Bible Reading plans, on how to read Sacred Scripture, some reliabe and good plans, I want to incorporate prayer as well as study into my reading. Also, I want to do some solo Bible Study, Can i get some tips on how to study the Bible Solo? I need some tips, pointers and plans and would very much appreciate your help in giving me some ideas!!

Thank you so much!!!

Once again, Thank you to TimothyH!! 😃
I think a good way (IMHO there is no such thing as the best way, since mileages vary for different people) to condition yourself is to view the Bible not being so much as a single, thick volume, but as a library of different works - which is what they are.
 
Thank you everyone!! I will have many methods of reading Sacred Scripture now, I will want to try all of them, though not at once.! Thank you all once again!!
 
So what are the narrative books of the Bible? What are the books which tell the story?
I agree with Tim’s suggestion – read the narrative books first, so that you understand the ‘story’! Start with the Old Testament, so you understand what the setting of the story is, and then read the Gospels (Luke is a good one to start with), so that you see how the promises in the OT are fulfilled in the NT!

If memory serves, this approach is the one that Jeff Cavins suggests in his Great Adventure Scripture study.

Once you have a handle on this material – and keep in mind, you’ll need to understand that context of the stories you read, especially the OT ones (after all, in my 40’s, I can barely understand what teens say, and there’s only a couple of decades between us – how could I hope to understand the stories of three millenia ago, if I don’t try to put them in their own contexts? 😉 ), or else the stories might seem confusing. A good Scripture study is invaluable to help with this (again, Cavins – which, if memory serves, gets replayed on EWTN (on the radio for sure, and maybe on TV, too) – or any other good Catholic Scripture study)!

Reading the Lectionary is great advice … but if you don’t know the story, it’s kinda like opening a book you haven’t yet tried to read to some random page, and trying to make sense of it! A program to read a couple of pages every day is good, too, but as you found, once you hit Leviticus, it’s like running out of gas on a deserted highway!

May your reading of Scripture bear great fruit in your life!
 
While I do not wish to be contrary to what Gorgias has said above, I must respectfully disagree with starting with the OT…

In my view, Any Christian needs to begin with the Gospels. The teachings of our Lord and King Jesus Christ - the words from His lips…
Everything else needs to be understood within these.

We do not build our lives on what is written in the OT for that is the “old covenant” (OC). We are under the “new covenant” (NC) which is Jesus Christ.
The OC contains many Laws, the the NC contains but one - The Law of Love upon which all the rest is based.

That said, I agree with starting with “narrative” books, which is why I suggested the Gospel of Matthew (or one of the other synoptic Gospels) followed by Acts of the Apostles.

Once one has a firm grasp on how we are to live as Christians - THEN one can delve into the “supporting documents” of the NT - the books of the OT.

Of course the above is only my opinion…
Much will depend on the particular position of a given individual on their faith journey and how they approach and absorb information.

Peace
James
 
While I do not wish to be contrary to what Gorgias has said above, I must respectfully disagree with starting with the OT…

In my view, Any Christian needs to begin with the Gospels. The teachings of our Lord and King Jesus Christ - the words from His lips…
Everything else needs to be understood within these.
James,

I understand what you’re saying, and there’s wisdom there. Yes, we need to understand Jesus’ words; His Good News is the basis of our lives.
We do not build our lives on what is written in the OT for that is the “old covenant” (OC).
Yet, we read the Old Testament not to “build our lives” on the covenants found there, but to gain the knowledge that we need in order to fully understand what’s in the New Testament. Without that knowledge, it’s not too difficult to misunderstand what’s going on in the NT. For instance, let’s take a look the Eucharist. Without an understanding of Exodus, a reading of the Last Supper looks like some new ritual that Jesus is setting up. His comments “this is my body” just hang out there, without context and incomprehensible. However, if we’ve read the story of the 1st Passover, and of God’s command to celebrate it always (as a requirement for membership in God’s family), then we get closer to understanding it. If we’ve read the story of Abraham & Isaac on the mountain, in which we see that God has promised to send a lamb… and if we connect that to the Passover sacrifice of a lamb… and if we see that Jesus is taking the place of the Paschal lamb at the Last Supper – well, it starts to click! We see the inescapable internal logic of the Scriptures, and we’re no longer just reading a page, we’re actually seeing the plan of God come to fulfillment! (Wow! :D).

And, if we want to understand the priesthood of Jesus Christ, and all we see is the narratives in the Gospels, we’re kind of left scratching our heads. Yet, if we know the history of how God calls some to sanctify His people, from the OT, then we get a greater insight into why the Catholic priesthood makes sense!

See what I mean? We don’t read the OT in order to take it as our ultimate law – instead, we read the OT so that we’ll truly understand the New Covenant of Christ!
Once one has a firm grasp on how we are to live as Christians - THEN one can delve into the “supporting documents” of the NT - the books of the OT.
I guess that my point is that I think we can’t have a “firm grasp” until we plumb the depths of the OT for the wisdom it gives us. The Church has done so, in its teachings. If we want to understand them fully, the OT is essential…!
 
Thank you TimothyH for the good that you did. It is inspiring, just as your post was on the senses of scripture.

There is something that wasn’t mentioned yet, that beggs to be known to every Catholic in regard to Divine Revelation. In which it does not consist in Scripture alone. Sacred Scripture is incomplete without Sacred Tradition and the Papal Magisterium. There three componets are a three legged stool, with one missing the surface wabbles and cannot stand. Click here to Read Dei Verbum and look for number 10 in here it states how they are linked together. vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_const_19651118_dei-verbum_en.html

In case it is not clear to you what indicates Sacred Tradition there is a brief explaination of it and the Holy Spirit here in the Catechism in number 688 vatican.va/archive/ENG0015/__P1Z.HTM

So mymamamary, by reading your prior post you have impressed into my mind that you want to be a priest. Become priest who preaches the whole truth by including all three componets of Divine Revelation in your homilies. Start studing now because it takes work. Here below are some tools:

www.vatican.va click on reasource library there you will find the Catechism and the Second Vatican Council documents. Seacrh the footnotes and see the connectiveness of Sacred Scripture and Sacred Tradition. A book on these might do best.

There is also www.bibliaclerus.org here you find a bible and a click away to many links that directed you to the Papal Magisterium and Sacred Tradition with their usage of the verse in the bible that was choosen.

Be a good priest with the advice of St. Greogry the Great here you will find how here follows scripture in his presention on pastoral care. newadvent.org/fathers/3601.htm
He is also a timely witness to Sacred Tradition.

It’s alot work to be a good priest. With prayer and the drive that you have to become one you should do well in a comprehensive study.
 
Gorgias,
Great response above…I’m sure that our two views will be helpful to others.
I’m glad that you were not offended…

Peace
James
 
While I do not wish to be contrary to what Gorgias has said above, I must respectfully disagree with starting with the OT…

In my view, Any Christian needs to begin with the Gospels. The teachings of our Lord and King Jesus Christ - the words from His lips…
Everything else needs to be understood within these.

We do not build our lives on what is written in the OT for that is the “old covenant” (OC). We are under the “new covenant” (NC) which is Jesus Christ.
The OC contains many Laws, the the NC contains but one - The Law of Love upon which all the rest is based.

That said, I agree with starting with “narrative” books, which is why I suggested the Gospel of Matthew (or one of the other synoptic Gospels) followed by Acts of the Apostles.

Once one has a firm grasp on how we are to live as Christians - THEN one can delve into the “supporting documents” of the NT - the books of the OT.

Of course the above is only my opinion…
Much will depend on the particular position of a given individual on their faith journey and how they approach and absorb information.

Peace
James
This is a good post. If I had to start today, it would be the Gospel of John. No doubt about that.

At a certain point however, we need to bring in the Old Testament which is the basis, the foundation, for just about all of Jesus teaching. The deepest and fullest understanding of the Gospels comes when we have a full understanding of the Old Testament scriptures which much of the Gospels draw from.

One example is the Transfiguration. The transfiguration is all but incomprehensible outside of the context of knowledge of how the Old Testament itself is constructed - law and prophets - as well as a thourough knowledge of the Exodus and its many meanings.

Another example is the Mount Olivet discourse, which draws most heavily from the Book of Daniel. I think out of the whole Bible, only the Book of Revelation is misinterpreted more than the Olivet Discourse, and it is a shame because both draw heavily from the writings of Jerimiah, Daniel and Ezekiel, knowledge of which makes them much more easily approachable.

There is much to learn from the Gosples by simply sitting down and reading them and one just beginning with the Bible would do well to simply read the Gospels. As one matures with the Bible and begins to get more comfortable with the texts however, they will develope the desire to mine the texts for the hidden gems, the desire to go down into the diamond mine and begin pulling out diamonds and rubies and other gemstones. And that means understanding the Old Testament.

Paul told Timothy that he should strive to “Accurately handle the word of truth.” (cf 2 Timothy 2:15) All Christians should strive to accurately handle God’s word, and in order to do that, we need a Sacred Tradition, Magesterium, conciousness of the senses of Scripture, an undersanding of the history, culture, politics, economics and lifestyle of the authors and their audience, and we need knowledtge of the Old Testament.

The role of Mary is revealed in the Old Testament. The Bread of the Presence is a prelude to the Eucharist. The list goes on.

I think it is good to start with the Gospels, but at a certain point, knowing how to accurately handle the Bible means undestanding and studying the Old Testament. Those who fail to study the Old Testament are missing out on a huge treasure.

-Tim-
 
I have read the Bible several times from cover to cover. It takes one year to read three chapters a day plus five on Sundays. It is important to set aside 15 minutes a day and to make the commitment to reading.
When my brother died, I received his Christian Almanac. Along with historical events for each day, it also has a year plan for reading the Bible. The plan basically entails reading 2 chapters from the Old Testament plus one chapter from the New Testament daily. Reading the Old Testament brings meaning to the New Testament while we read the Old Testament in light of the New Testament.
Have a set time of 15 minutes as well as a set number of chapters to read each day will help during while reading those books such as Chronicles where you might tend to get bogged down in the numbers and genealogies. Find a comfortable place to seat, take off your shoes, and begin to read.
You will also be reading scripture if you read the daily readings from Mass, even if you are unable to attend.
 
The book of Leviticus is complicated, there is no doubt. I’ve read it a couple times, but I don’t have it all sorted out.

The book resists any attempts at simplified summary. Those don’t do it justice.

I found it to be surprisingly Catholic in action.

You’ve sinned. You go to the priest and confess your sin. (HEY, just like Catholics do.) You bring your offering (an unblemished animal), you put your hands on the head of the animal as it is sacrificied. That is, you very closely identify with the animal dying (instead of you, for your sin, after all). You sacrifice the best of your flock, because sin is so offensive to God.

The blood is splashed on the altar. Why? your sin has defiled the altar. The blood of the animal re-dedicates the altar and makes it holy, like it was consecrated with blood at the start.

This portrays the effect of the blood of Jesus on our altar, today. Jesus dies for our sins, and by his blood we are healed.

In certain of the sacrifices, the sacrificial animal is roasted immediately, and you consume some of it, right there. This foreshadows the Eucharistic meal where we consume the Body and Blood of Jesus Christ.

etc. etc. VERY Catholic.

There is the “wave” offering, where the priest holds up the offering, as it were, to show it to God. Remind you of any “offeratory” in the Mass where the priest holds up the bread and the cup of wine? Raising the gifts and the consecrated species is not for visibility purposes, it is raising it up to God (in the first instance).

Without a connection to Catholicism and the Mass, Leviticus would be pretty useless, wouldn’t it? It’s there for a big reason. Brother Bob Fishman (of EWTN fame) says the Mass is very “Jewish” and this is why.

Are you bored at Mass, too? Not trying to be nasty. We ALL didn’t understand this. We have to want to understand this stuff, in order to get at its meaning.

When you get past all this sacrifice stuff, there’s a lot of other important commandments in Leviticus, too – one of which is that you can’t just sacrifice your bull anyplace, like out in a field. The sacrifice has to be there, in the temple (in the Church). ding, ding, ding.
 
Dear Forum!!

I just recieved a Bible that was bought for me by TimothyH, so a big shout of thanks to TimothyH for the Bible. It is the 2nd RSV edition. I want to read Sacred Scripture, but i’ve made the mistake before of trying to read cover to cover. Needless to say, I got bogged down in Leviticus. Can I please get some Bible Reading plans, on how to read Sacred Scripture, some reliabe and good plans, I want to incorporate prayer as well as study into my reading. Also, I want to do some solo Bible Study, Can i get some tips on how to study the Bible Solo? I need some tips, pointers and plans and would very much appreciate your help in giving me some ideas!!

Thank you so much!!!

Once again, Thank you to TimothyH!! 😃
The most important thing to remember, in my experience (thanks to the advice of the Abbot Marmion in his book, Christ in his Mysteries), is that God is always talking to you
personally when you read the words of scripture. To me, it made a crucial difference, but maybe you are familiar with it already.
 
There are a number of considerations in studying the Bible.

The least productive is, as you found reading from cover to cover, The Hebrew Canon
arranges the Books in a different order than the Christian Canons. Simply dividing the
book into 365 sections to be read daily is no better.

First, the Bible is not a history. Even the Hebrew Testament is not a history in the way we
think of history. Philo, a Jewish philosopher from Alexandria Egypt and a contemporary of Jesus referred to the Hebrew Testament as an historical allegory of God’s chosen people.

None of the Canons, Hebrew, Roman, Slavic, or Protestant have the Books arranged in
the order in which they were written!

Even within the Books, the are different time periods. Genesis Chapter 1 was written
400 years after Chapter 2!

It is important to know the context in which the Scriptural author was writing to gain an
better understanding of the writing. In the case of the Hebrew Scriptures, we lose a lot
in translation. This is especially true of the acrostic, or teaching writings. John’s Gospel
cannot be fully appreciated without identifying and understanding the nested chiasms in
the writing. If you are studying without assistance it may be helpful to go on line and
find the text books that are used in various college course of “Bible As Literature”.

The rabbi’s have taught correctly that there is no one single “correct” interpretation of any
verse in Scripture.

The rabbinic scholars have identified 4 levels of communication of the Scripturres.
The p-shat or simple literal meaning.
A Samaritan woman was standing at a well.
The remez or hint of a meaning
An outsider, a Samaritan, can drink from Jesus’ well, the well of salvation
This is Jacob’s well, so it fulfills a Hebrew Testament promise
The water from the well is the source of life
The drash, or allegorical meaning
All of the remez interpretations
plus:
It is Jesus, not His apostles whoi grants the source of the living water to
the outsider
Should we be Christlike and recognize God’s gifts, including salvation,
those whom we perceive as outsiders?
Does God forgive those who have 5 husbands? Will God forgive us
for adulterating His Word?

The sod or secret meaning
This is the message we personally receive from God, if we are receptive
each time we read Scripture.
It is why we can find a new meaning to a pericope(a group of verses) each
time we read them.

As far as a reading plan, things work more intelligibly if have a plan.

One plan is to follow the Lectionary. The Lectionary has 5 readings for each Sunday
Code:
     Hebrew Testament Reading
     Responsorial Psalm
     New of Greek Testament Reading
     Gospel Acclamaition  (Alleluia verse)
     Gospel
These 5 readings are supplimented in the Roman Missal by an Entrance Antiphon/Introit
and a Communion Antiphon. If a choir sings, these antiphons are not read, but the hymns
the choir sings should match these antiphons in theme.

There is an 8th reading, the Offertory Antiphon and if a choir sings the Offertory hymn should match this Antiphon is theme.

All 8 readings ARE related to each other.

The Gospel Acclamaition is the theme of all of the readings. Start there and see how
each of the other readings can be interpreted in light of that reading.

The Protestant Lectionary (Revised Common Lectionary) usually matches the Roman Catholic Lectionary at the Gospel reading level, and often at all other levels.

When the RCL has other readings, they are thematically similar. Even though the readings may be different, often they share common links to paragraphs of the
Catholic Catechism. It is more difficult to make the connection between the aggada of
the Mishnah and the Talumuds because at this time there is no published catalog of these
themes and teachings that crossreference to the Christian Catechisms.

An almost exact match occurs in the Easter Vigil readings. The RCL adds an 8th set
of Hebrew Testament and Psalm reading, “The Flood”. In most Protestant Liturgies on
the Easter Vigil, the Great Hillel, Psalm 136, the Heils Geschichte, History of Salvation
is sung, and the Roman Missal substitutes a hymn that erroneously has the Church replace God as the source of salvation.

Another thematic way to approach Bible study is to use one of the various “Devotional”
Bibles. Zondervan is the largest publish of these Bibles, which are based on the NIV or
rNIV translations. Typically these follow the Hebrew Canon and do not have the inter-
testamentary Books, but the themes and Scriptural theme links are great. You can Zondervan on line and purchase these and other Bibles and Bible study guides and programs from Christian Book Distributors in Peabody MA.

The level of study you are engaged in will determine the appropriate commentary that will
help you. Various study Bibles can be a first step, The Harper Collins Study Bible with
Apocrypha is amoung the best. You get a bonus of having the addition of the 4 Books
incuded in the Slavic Christian Canon that are missing from the Roman Canon.The Matthew Henry commentaries are pastorially oriented and are good primer coment- aries.
 
If you would like some resources for understanding Sacred Scripture from a Catholic perspective and have weekly studies on the Sunday readings, visit my website linked below.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top