Thank you all for the responses! The discussion has been very helpful.
I’m glad.
I don’t know if I would call my possible (it’s not a done deal yet) coming into communion with Rome a “conversion”. If I were anything other than Orthodox, I would agree with the term.
What you just said makes a lot of sense. One Orthodox person I know who entered the Catholic Church calls his decision a “translation” rather than a “conversion,” and you’ll find that many eastern Catholics
prefer to style themselves “Orthodox in communion with Rome.” To me, that makes perfect sense, because you wouldn’t be abandoning Orthodoxy by entering into communion with Rome.
I understand the practicality of finding the particular church that offers Mass in a more traditional way. However, what does the fact that 3 out of the 4 churches I’ve gone to, each in a different parish, have had this (forgive the strong word) protestant type Mass, mean for the Church in the US? I’ve been to Orthodox Divine Liturgies in multiple countries and multiple parishes within each country and they’ve all been the same. Why not with the Latin Rite?
In the United States (I live there, too), the Latin Catholic parishes are inconsistent in this way. I believe that we are subtly moving toward a more traditional way of celebrating Mass; however, you are correct that right now, one often finds what you have found.
We’re working on it.
I’m assuming that the Eastern Rite Churches in communion with Rome are more consistent.
You are correct. I’ve been to a couple Byzantine Rite Catholic parishes in my time; I’ve been to the Divine Liturgy of St. John Chrysostom and the Divine Liturgy of St. Basil the Great.
If you go to an eastern Catholic church of the Byzantine Rite, I guarantee you it will be extremely familiar to what you know as an Eastern Orthodox Christian. There will, of course, be a few differences - for instance, and most obviously, they commemorate the pope of Rome in their diptychs.
Or is it just a carry-over bias on my side?
No, I don’t think it’s bias; I think you’re right. Many Roman Rite Masses in the United States have that unfortunately secular or Protestant feel to them. As I said above, we’re working on it, but you’re not wrong.
I might feel more comfortable with the form of an Eastern Rite Church but, is that a solution or is it masking an issue?
No, it’s not just masking the issue or treating the symptom. You as an individual do not have an obligation (let alone the power) to fix the way the Roman Rite Mass is offered in countries like the U.S.
Perhaps it would be inappropriate of someone to join an eastern Catholic church if their
only reason were dislike of the Ordinary Form of the Roman Rite, but that would
not be the principal reason you’d be in an eastern Catholic church: rather, the principal reason you’d be in an eastern Catholic church is that people who join the Catholic Church are
by default enrolled in the self-governing church that most closely corresponds to their church of origin. So you would be in a Catholic church that uses the Byzantine Rite.