B
benjohnson
Guest
If I could just make out what Luther was pointing to on this table…No. We don’t.
Jon
http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/uploads/pics/zwing.1_04.jpg
If I could just make out what Luther was pointing to on this table…No. We don’t.
Jon
Well, if something is posted on an internet forum and then not corrected, some might take that as an indication that it was already correct. So …It is possible that you may be corrected on the former point.
Or, you may not be.
GKC
Hi leamar3. Here is, hopefully, a more helpful way of looking at it: intercommunion requires consent from both sides. Thus, for example, I cannot receive in an Orthodox church b/c the Orthodox Church would not approve of it; and I cannot receive in an Anglican church b/c my church (the Catholic Church) would not approve of it.I’m not really sure where to put this question, so I’m going to put it here and hope it’s ok.
If a non-catholic receives communion in a Catholic Church, it’s considered a sin. If a non-catholic receives communion in a non-catholic church it’s not a sin, correct?
Thanks in advance for any (name removed by moderator)ut.
Not necessarily a sin, but it’s not a good thing to do.
But my denomination asks that you be a full member of the denomination AND on the same page theologically before receiving. The exception would be if another conservative Lutheran, a LCMS person for example, were to meet with the pastor before and the pastor allows it.
We teach the real presence in the Eucharist, and therefore all Christians who don’t accept the real presence are barred.
No Lutheran believes in “consubstantiation”.If I’m not mistaken, while Lutherans believe in the Real Presence, they believe in Consubstantiation.
While Catholics believe in Transubstantiation.
So the theology is different.
God Bless
Ben, we could have some serious fun with this but it would get a bit off topic.If I could just make out what Luther was pointing to on this table…
http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/uploads/pics/zwing.1_04.jpg
So it’s a sin because if I don’t believe everything that the Church teaches, then I’m not in communion with the Church and can’t receive communion because I’m not a firm believer in Church law or doctrine? Did Jesus put this into place? That is a serious question, I’m not trying to be rude. I’m just trying to learn everything I can before I make the decision to continue with RCIA.Its sinful because of the difference of what the Catholic Church teaches and what the Reformation Church’s teaching
Ok my me!Ben, we could have some serious fun with this but it would get a bit off topic.![]()
Ok my me!
“Did you put your cup on my table??? You left a moisture ring… you… swine!”
“Look at my flea circus!”
"This is a table. In my language it’s called a ‘Erhöhteplattform-füressenundtrinkenundhaltendinge’ "
I think it is Luther pointing to one of the Gospels where it says “hoc est enim corpus meum” during a debate with either Calvin or Zwingli.Ok my me!
“Did you put your cup on my table??? You left a moisture ring… you… swine!”
“Look at my flea circus!”
"This is a table. In my language it’s called a ‘Erhöhteplattform-füressenundtrinkenundhaltendinge’ "
Leamar,So it’s a sin because if I don’t believe everything that the Church teaches, then I’m not in communion with the Church and can’t receive communion because I’m not a firm believer in Church law or doctrine? Did Jesus put this into place? That is a serious question, I’m not trying to be rude. I’m just trying to learn everything I can before I make the decision to continue with RCIA.
I think it is Luther pointing to one of the Gospels where it says “hoc est enim corpus meum” during a debate with either Calvin or Zwingli…
At least I was part right there.
It’s Luther debating Zwingli - in frustration to Zwingli’s obtuse arguments about the eucharist being symbolic, Luther scratched the words “hoc est enim corpus meum” and pointed to them. As Zwingli continued his arguments, Luther would reply by pointing again.
When a non-Catholic receives communion in his own church or another Protestant church there would be no reason to think he is not sincere or that he is committing sin.I’m not really sure where to put this question, so I’m going to put it here and hope it’s ok.
If a non-catholic receives communion in a Catholic Church, it’s considered a sin. If a non-catholic receives communion in a non-catholic church it’s not a sin, correct?
Thanks in advance for any (name removed by moderator)ut.
See where your coming with with this but I’m not sure you can say that everyone who does this is disrespectful. I know of a few musicians working in the Roman Catholic church who are devout Anglicans and Lutherans who are unable to attend Eucharist in their own churches because they work during Mass who view their partaking of communion in Roman Catholic churches as a matter of personal salvation (receiving the real presence of Christ/a Christ instituted Sacrament). An anecdote yes, but one with important meaning meaning for both the church and the receivers.
Someone who is aware of Church discipline regarding the Eucharist but deliberately ignores it is at least disrespectful and may be guilty of sin.
.:
The Catholic church makes provision for this. NonCatholics who have a Catholic faith in this sacrament, who feel a need for it, and who are unable to receive in their own church can ask the pastor for a dispensation to receive communion at Mass. Perhaps the musicians you mention are in this situation. In my parish there was an Episcopalian woman who used to come to daily Mass and received communion.See where your coming with with this but I’m not sure you can say that everyone who does this is disrespectful. I know of a few musicians working in the Roman Catholic church who are devout Anglicans and Lutherans who are unable to attend Eucharist in their own churches because they work during Mass who view their partaking of communion in Roman Catholic churches as a matter of personal salvation (receiving the real presence of Christ/a Christ instituted Sacrament). An anecdote yes, but one with important meaning meaning for both the church and the receivers.
Just curious. Would an orthodox Anglican (whatever that might mean!), under similar circumstances (i.e. a chat with your pastor) be allowed to commune?And the reverse.
Jon
Maybe Jon has seen differently, but generally, yes. If someone believes in the Real Presence and knows enough to ask the pastor beforehand, chances are they will be permitted after examination by the pastor. These sorts of people are usually educated enough to understand that, when the option is available, they should commune in their own church. These are individual pastoral discretions and are certainly not the norm, however.Just curious. Would an orthodox Anglican (whatever that might mean!), under similar circumstances (i.e. a chat with your pastor) be allowed to commune?
Steido’s answer is essentially the one I would give. However, “close” communion allows for some local autonomy in these matters. That parish autonomy can work for a Anglican, or against, depending on the view of the pastor and elders. Some would say our parish is rather “liberal” in our willingness to permit someone in a circumstance such as you offer to commune.Just curious. Would an orthodox Anglican (whatever that might mean!), under similar circumstances (i.e. a chat with your pastor) be allowed to commune?
Lutherans are in full-communion with the Anglican/ Episcopal Church. You are welcome to partake of holy Communion without consulting with the pastor/ priest.Just curious. Would an orthodox Anglican (whatever that might mean!), under similar circumstances (i.e. a chat with your pastor) be allowed to commune?