R
RandomGirl
Guest
Basically what do you think about receiving communion in the hand instead of the mouth? Is it alright to receive it in the hand? I’ve heard it’s better to receive in the mouth.
Last edited:
If course it is. The Church wouldn’t allow it if it weren’t.Is it alright to receive it in the hand?
I believe this is a banned topic on the forum, hand vs. tongue. I may be wrong, but let’s all pray that I’m right and end these infinite discussions of the topic.OP, you might want to check the search feature while you wait for more posts to come in. (I just checked and I stopped counting when I hit 99 threads with Communion in the hand in the title.)
For me, I personally let the host sit for a little bit prior to swallowing. And in my experience I haven’t yet come across one that would take minutes. (Unless I’m more patient than I realize.) Part if the may be that I also prefer to receive both species which speeds things up a bit, but I am curious if you’d have any pictures of the kind if host you’re thinking of.There are Communion hosts in use today that would take minutes to dissolve.
if you watch the priest closely you will see that he adds a bit of the bread to the wine. So it probably never came from someone’s mouth.Do you know what though a couple of times when I’ve had received the precious blood I’ve seen a fragment of the Body of Christ in the bottom of the chalice and it has grossed me out a bit that it’s been in someone’s mouth. Anyone else have this?
I don’t see how this is an outward sign of humility and dependence.I personally think we should go back to receiving exclusively on the tongue as an outward sign of humility and dependence.