Receiving just the bread and not the wine

  • Thread starter Thread starter Catholicbyfaith
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
C

Catholicbyfaith

Guest
I am in RCIA and I have noticed that some people only receive the body of Christ and not the Blood of Christ. Is this okay to do, and if so what is the purpose? If so, does it work both ways, could you just receive the blood of Christ?

:confused:
 
I am in RCIA and I have noticed that some people only receive the body of Christ and not the Blood of Christ. Is this okay to do, and if so what is the purpose? If so, does it work both ways, could you just receive the blood of Christ?

:confused:

Yes----it is fine to receive only the Host. The Host IS the Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity of our Lord Jesus Christ. For people who have an alergy to wheat----receiving the Cup would be sufficient.

Holy Communion can be received by the Host alone, the Host and the Cup, or by the Cup alone.
 
I typical receive our Lord under the appearance of bread, and abstain from the chalice, I don’t want Jesus in my mustache.
 
For people who have an alergy to wheat----receiving the Cup would be sufficient.

Holy Communion can be received by the Host alone, the Host and the Cup, or by the Cup alone.
Could you give a reference or citation regarding this? I’ve looked in several places and, while I find numerous instances of the acceptability of receiving only under the form of bread, I can find none permitting only the reception under the form of wine. Thanks for any help you can provide.
 
Could you give a reference or citation regarding this? I’ve looked in several places and, while I find numerous instances of the acceptability of receiving only under the form of bread, I can find none permitting only the reception under the form of wine. Thanks for any help you can provide.

From the Code of Canon Law.

vatican.va/archive/ENG1104/_INDEX.HTM

Can. 925 Holy communion is to be given under the form of bread alone, or under both species according to the norm of the liturgical laws, or even under the form of wine alone in a case of necessity.
 
Could you give a reference or citation regarding this? I’ve looked in several places and, while I find numerous instances of the acceptability of receiving only under the form of bread, I can find none permitting only the reception under the form of wine. Thanks for any help you can provide.
From the USCCB website

usccb.org/liturgy/celiasprue.shtml
What if a person cannot consume low gluten hosts?
Such communicants may still receive the Precious Blood.
Catholics believe that whoever receives Holy Communion only under the form of bread or only under the form of wine still receives the whole Christ, in his Body and Blood, soul and divinity.
 
That’s quite normal in my part of the world. The chalice is not usually made available to the congregation. It’s fine.
 
You cannot separate the Body from the Blood or the Blood from the Body so when you receive one you receive the other. That said, it is the discipline of our Church to receive either the Host, the Host and Chalice or, in cases of necessity, just the Chalice. We wouldn’t receive the Chalice only unless we had a necessity because it is not our discipline to do so. It doesn’t mean that the Body and Blood are not contained in the Chalice. It is just not our discipline.
 
I am in RCIA and I have noticed that some people only receive the body of Christ and not the Blood of Christ. Is this okay to do, and if so what is the purpose? If so, does it work both ways, could you just receive the blood of Christ?

:confused:
The risen Christ whom we receive is whole and complete. He is fully present, body, blood, soul and divinity, in each species.
 
My parish doesn’t offer the chalice to parishoners. Does anyone know if, in parishes such as mine, a person who cannot receive the host can specifically ask to receive the chalice? Of course this would have to be asked before mass, but has anyone ever had any experience with this?
 
My parish doesn’t offer the chalice to parishoners. Does anyone know if, in parishes such as mine, a person who cannot receive the host can specifically ask to receive the chalice? Of course this would have to be asked before mass, but has anyone ever had any experience with this?
Yes, I’ve seen it done at a legit parish. I would guess that most priests would not want to purposefully deny someone Communion out of convienience only.
 
My parish doesn’t offer the chalice to parishoners. Does anyone know if, in parishes such as mine, a person who cannot receive the host can specifically ask to receive the chalice? Of course this would have to be asked before mass, but has anyone ever had any experience with this?
Yes, our parish doesn’t offer the chalice, either. But there is a lady with a wheat allergy at one of the masses and the priest saves The Blood for her.

Since the parish I have always went to only gives The Host, save for Easter and Christmas, I have never got accustomed to recieving from the chalice. I feel weird about chewing up the Host fast or sticking Him to the roof of my mouth, so I skip The Precious Blood at other parishes. Does anyone have any advice regarding that?
 
It is perfectly fine to receive communion under one species.

I had served as an extraordinary minister at 8 a.m. Sunday Mass under a Pastor that used to fill at least four chalices to the brim. Few people chose to receive under both species, and I was responsible to purify the vessels. It was very difficult to consume that early in the morning.
 
I had served as an extraordinary minister at 8 a.m. Sunday Mass under a Pastor that used to fill at least four chalices to the brim. Few people chose to receive under both species, and I was responsible to purify the vessels. It was very difficult to consume that early in the morning.
It was my belief that only ordinary ministers were supposed to purify the vessels and, unless there is an extenuating circumstance, consume the remaining blood. This was a terrible position for you to be placed in, espically in light of the amount remaining and the accidents of the Blood of our dear Lord.

From Redemptionis Sacramentum
[119.] The Priest, once he has returned to the altar after the distribution of Communion, standing at the altar or at the credence table, purifies the paten or ciborium over the chalice, then purifies the chalice in accordance with the prescriptions of the Missal and wipes the chalice with the purificator. Where a Deacon is present, he returns with the Priest to the altar and purifies the vessels.* It is permissible, however, especially if there are several vessels to be purified, to leave them, covered as may be appropriate, on a corporal on the altar or on the credence table, and for them to be purified by the Priest or Deacon immediately after Mass once the people have been dismissed. *Moreover a duly instituted acolyte assists the Priest or Deacon in purifying and arranging the sacred vessels either at the altar or the credence table. *In the absence of a Deacon, a duly instituted acolyte carries the sacred vessels to the credence table and there purifies, wipes and arranges them in the usual way.*209]

Perhaps if the pastor were to purify the vessels himself, he would become aware of the need to consecrate less.

God bless!
 
It was my belief that only ordinary ministers were supposed to purify the vessels and, unless there is an extenuating circumstance, consume the remaining blood. This was a terrible position for you to be placed in, espically in light of the amount remaining and the accidents of the Blood of our dear Lord.

From Redemptionis Sacramentum
[119.] The Priest, once he has returned to the altar after the distribution of Communion, standing at the altar or at the credence table, purifies the paten or ciborium over the chalice, then purifies the chalice in accordance with the prescriptions of the Missal and wipes the chalice with the purificator. Where a Deacon is present, he returns with the Priest to the altar and purifies the vessels.* It is permissible, however, especially if there are several vessels to be purified, to leave them, covered as may be appropriate, on a corporal on the altar or on the credence table, and for them to be purified by the Priest or Deacon immediately after Mass once the people have been dismissed. *Moreover a duly instituted acolyte assists the Priest or Deacon in purifying and arranging the sacred vessels either at the altar or the credence table. *In the absence of a Deacon, a duly instituted acolyte carries the sacred vessels to the credence table and there purifies, wipes and arranges them in the usual way.*209]

Perhaps if the pastor were to purify the vessels himself, he would become aware of the need to consecrate less.

God bless!
Thanks for posting this, I have never seen my priest or any priest, for that matter; at my parish do this…the only place I have seen it done, was on EWTN.

Pam
 
I don’t want to drink out of the same cup as everyone since who knows what virses and germs are in there so I usually don’t drink from the cup.
 
I don’t want to drink out of the same cup as everyone since who knows what virses and germs are in there so I usually don’t drink from the cup.
The Chalice contains the Blood of Our Lord Jesus Christ! I couldn’t even imagine thinking of germs and viruses.
 
The Chalice contains the Blood of Our Lord Jesus Christ! I couldn’t even imagine thinking of germs and viruses.
Please do so before receiving if you happen to be suffering from a cold or flu.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top