Receiving the Eucharist on the Tongue

  • Thread starter Thread starter Domnall
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
D

Domnall

Guest
I’m not 100% sure of an answer to this so I’m asking you folks who know the best. I grew up in a Traditionalist Catholic church and we always received the Eucharist on our tongues. However, when I started going to the parish I attend now, we receive the Eucharist in our hands. However, I see some people (especially the elderly) receiving it on their tongues still.

Well, my question is can I do that as well? Is it appropriate for me to choose to receive the Eucharist on my tongue? I find it more respectful.
 
I’m not 100% sure of an answer to this so I’m asking you folks who know the best. I grew up in a Traditionalist Catholic church and we always received the Eucharist on our tongues. However, when I started going to the parish I attend now, we receive the Eucharist in our hands. However, I see some people (especially the elderly) receiving it on their tongues still.

Well, my question is can I do that as well? Is it appropriate for me to choose to receive the Eucharist on my tongue? I find it more respectful.
Yes, it is always permissible in the Latin Rite to receive on the tongue.
 
I’m not 100% sure of an answer to this so I’m asking you folks who know the best. I grew up in a Traditionalist Catholic church and we always received the Eucharist on our tongues. However, when I started going to the parish I attend now, we receive the Eucharist in our hands. However, I see some people (especially the elderly) receiving it on their tongues still.

Well, my question is can I do that as well? Is it appropriate for me to choose to receive the Eucharist on my tongue? I find it more respectful.
the option to receiving on the tongue or in the hand are both allowed by the Church and is up to the communicant

there will be some practical reasons that a priest or a parish may prefer one form over the other. like during the H1N1 outbreak, many parishes would strongly encourage communicants to receive in the hand. our parish priest advises anyone receiving communion and is carrying a baby will only receive on the tongue, even if one hand is free.
 
I’m not 100% sure of an answer to this so I’m asking you folks who know the best. I grew up in a Traditionalist Catholic church and we always received the Eucharist on our tongues. However, when I started going to the parish I attend now, we receive the Eucharist in our hands. However, I see some people (especially the elderly) receiving it on their tongues still.

Well, my question is can I do that as well? Is it appropriate for me to choose to receive the Eucharist on my tongue? I find it more respectful.
Here’s the answer from Pope Benedict quoted in his own words. This article was written by Dave Martin.

Pope Benedict to Catholics: Kneel For Communion

“Whosoever shall eat this bread, or drink the chalice of the Lord unworthily, shall be guilty of the Body and of the Blood of the Lord… For he that eateth and drinketh unworthily, eateth and drinketh judgment to himself, not discerning the Body of the Lord” - 1 Corinthians 11:27,28
Pope Benedict to Catholics:
Kneel and Receive on the Tongue Only
Pope Benedict XVI does not want the faithful receiving Communion in their hand nor does he want them standing to receive Christ in the Blessed Sacrament. According to Vatican liturgist, Monsignor Guido Marini, the pope is trying to set the stage for the whole church as to the proper norm for receiving Communion for which reason communicants at his papal Masses are now asked to kneel and receive on the tongue.
The Holy Father’s reasoning is simple: “We Christians kneel before the Blessed Sacrament because, therein, we know and believe to be the presence of the One True God.” (May 22, 2008)
According to the pope the entire Church should kneel in adoration before God in the Eucharist. “Kneeling in adoration before the Eucharist is the most valid and radical remedy against the idolatries of yesterday and today” (May 22, 2008)
The pope’s action is in accord with the Church’s 2000 year tradition and is being done in order to foster a renewed love and respect for the Eucharist which presently is being mocked and treated with contempt. The various trends and innovations of our time (guitar liturgy, altar girls, lay ministers, Communion in the hand) have worked together to destroy our regard for the Eucharist, thus advancing the spiritual death of the church. After all, the Eucharist is the very life and heartbeat of the Mystical Body around which the entire Church must revolve.
Kneeling also coincides with the Church’s centuries old ordinance that only the consecrated hands of a priest touch the Body of Christ in Holy Communion. “To priests alone has been given power to consecrate and administer to the faithful, the Holy Eucharist.” (Council of Trent) This teaching is beautifully expressed by St. Thomas Aquinas in his Summa Theologica: “Because out of reverence towards this sacrament, nothing touches it, but what is consecrated; hence the corporal and the chalice are consecrated, and likewise the priest’s hands, for touching this sacrament.”
It is for reason that Pope Paul VI in his May 1969 pastoral letter to the world’s bishops reaffirmed the Church’s teaching on the reception of Communion, stating that: “This method on the tongue must be retained.” (Memoriale Domini) This came in response to the bishops of Holland who started Communion in the hand in defiance of the centuries old decree from the Council of Rouen (650 A.D.) where this practice was condemned as sacrilegious. “Do not put the Eucharist in the hands of any layperson, but only in their mouths.” To date this prohibition has never been overturned legally.

Today Communion in the hand is carried on illegally and has become a major tool of the enemy to destory the Faith throughout the world. For this practice serves no other purpose than to warp our conception of Jesus Christ and nourish a contempt for the sacred mysteries. It’s no wonder St. Basil referred to Communion in the hand as “a grave fault.”

That is to say, Communion in the hand is not tied with Catholic tradition. This practice was first introduced to the Church by the heretical Arians of the 4th century as a means of expressing their belief that Christ was not divine. Unfortunately, it has served to express the same in our time and has been at the very heart of the present heresy and desecration that is rampant throughout the universal Church. If we have ‘abuse’ problems today it is because we’re abusing the Sacrament - it’s backfiring on us!
Thanks to Communion in the hand, members of satanic cults are now given easy access to come into the Church and take the Host so that they bring it back to their covens where it is abused and brutalized in the ritualistic Black Mass to Satan. They crush the Host under their shoes as a mockery to the living God, and we assist it with our casual practice? Amongst themselves the satanists declare that Communion in the hand is the greatest thing that ever happened to them, and we do nothing to stop it?

Hence, the Holy Father is doing his part to try to purge the Church of abuse and we as members of Christ are called upon to assist him. For your encouragement we include the following quotation from Cardinal Llovera, the new prefect for the Vatican’s Congregation for Divine Worship and Discipline of the Sacraments speaking to Life Site News on July 22, 2009: “It is the mission of the Congregation for Divine Worship and Sacraments to work to promote Pope Benedict’s emphasis on the traditional practices of liturgy, such as reception of Communion on the tongue while kneeling.”
 
Here is the rest of the article…It was too long to post within one thread.

Also worth considering is the recent decree from Cardinal Caffarra, the Archbishop of Bologna Italy, forbidding the practice of Communion in the hand: “Many cases of profanation of the Eucharist have occurred, profiting by the possibility to receive the consecrated Bread on one’s palm of the hand… Considering the frequency in which cases of irreverent behavior in the act of receiving the Eucharist have been reported, we dispose that starting from today in the Metropolitan Church of St. Peter, in the Basilica of St. Petronius and in the Shrine of the Holy Virgin of St. Luke in Bologna the faithful are to receive the consecrated Bread only from the hands of the Minister directly on the tongue.” (from his decree on the reception of the Eucharist, issued April 27, 2009)
Technically all bishops and clergy are bound to follow the Holy Father’s directive on this issue, but in the meantime the faithful are not obliged to wait for the approval of their bishop in order to kneel for God. The directives of the Holy Father are not subject to the veto or scrutiny of the bishops and therefore all pastors and laity have a right and duty to put these directives into practice for the edification of their communities.
Our Lady’s Workers of Southern California"
David Martin
 
Receiving on the tongue is actually the ordinary way of receiving communion in the Roman rite. The option of receiving in the hand was granted by indult. In fact, receiving in the hand began as an abuse that Rome struggled to prevent; this is why they eventually granted an indult.

I am against receiving communion in the hand. I do not believe that it fosters respect for the Real Presence of Our Lord in the Eucharist. Furthermore, reception of communion on the tongue is an ancient practice of the Roman rite; it is part of our liturgical heritage and needs to be widely promoted. These are my personal opinions on the matter.
 
Nice2000 can you give us a link to the letter you quoted, or how we can find it on the internet ?
 
Dempsey -
Indults (exceptions) are granted only for a specific period of time according to Canon Law.
Do you know the details of this indult (time frame)? I could not find it on the Vatican site.
Is it the same for all Countries ?
 
I always receive on the tongue if a priest is distributing the Eucharist. If it’s an EMHC, I receive in the hand; I don’t prefer to receive from EMHC’s to begin with and something tells me that most of them aren’t prepared to distribute the Eucharist in the mouth. At my parish it almost seems that way 😊

I hope that the pope’s directive is one day made more universal and binding and that standing for communion as well as communion in the hand becomes rare and permissible only in exceptional circumstances.
 
the instructions for receiving in the hand originally came from St. John Chrysostom
 
I am a convert, confirmed in 2005. By the time of my confirmation, I had already decided to receive on the tongue, and that’s the only way I have received since my confirmation. I am fortunate in that I never have to receive the Body of Christ from an EMHC in my home parish, although I have done so (still on the tongue) at churches I have been visiting in my travels.

DaveBj
 
I’m not 100% sure of an answer to this so I’m asking you folks who know the best. I grew up in a Traditionalist Catholic church and we always received the Eucharist on our tongues. However, when I started going to the parish I attend now, we receive the Eucharist in our hands. However, I see some people (especially the elderly) receiving it on their tongues still.

Well, my question is can I do that as well? Is it appropriate for me to choose to receive the Eucharist on my tongue? I find it more respectful.
I receive only on the tongue.🙂

Not elderly, either 😃
 
I’ve seen a THIRD way of receiving and it was a nun that did this.

Let the priest put it in your hand. Stick your tongue out. Then bring your palm and face together, lifiting the Eucharist up to your tongue. This way you don’t have to pick up the host with your own fingers.

Sounds weird, but the priest doesn’t have to risk touching your mouth and transmitting germs to others or himself.
 
I’ve seen a THIRD way of receiving and it was a nun that did this.

Let the priest put it in your hand. Stick your tongue out. Then bring your palm and face together, lifiting the Eucharist up to your tongue. This way you don’t have to pick up the host with your own fingers.

Sounds weird, but the priest doesn’t have to risk touching your mouth and transmitting germs to others or himself.
It would appear there is a greater chance of dropping the host with this method!
In addition, after the Eucharist has been put in your unsanitary hand what difference does it make that you pick it up with your fingers? Secondly, there are fewer germs on your tongue than on your unwashed hands, been all through that issue during the H1N1 overreaction.
 
From my experience, receiving on the tongue helped to foster a reverence and devotion to the Eucharist, which God used to lead me to kneeling as well, down the line. Little did I know that this was actually the preferred way!

CITH-promoters would do well to remember that although their practice was somewhat accepted in the Early Church, they stamped it out quickly because they saw what joy and reverence is found in kneeling and receiving on the tongue. The Protestants revived this dead practice because they really understood lex orandi, lex credendi… the theology of receiving in the hand can raise conflicts in our image of the Eucharist, just basic psychology.

But to bring it back to God’s will… we don’t know how Christ gave the Eucharist at His Last Supper, His First Mass :). There is an old custom from His time and His locale for the dinner host to feed the guests… get this… kneeling and put food right in their mouth. Interesting, no? :hmmm:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top