Recieving communion more than once a day

  • Thread starter Thread starter topper7150
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
T

topper7150

Guest
I am under the impression that you are allowed to recieve communion once a day, but if you attend another Mass for other reasons than to fulfill your daily Mass desire, ( funeral, wedding). You must still observe the one hour fasting rule, and only recieve once a day. I would like to know if the fasting requirement holds for the second communion? and if there are any exceptions to these rules, that refer strictly to the laity.
 
Can. 917 A person who has already received the Most Holy Eucharist can receive it a second time on the same day only within the eucharistic celebration in which the person participates, without prejudice to the prescript of ⇒ can. 921, §2.

Can. 921 §1. The Christian faithful who are in danger of death from any cause are to be nourished by holy communion in the form of Viaticum.

§2. Even if they have been nourished by holy communion on the same day, however, those in danger of death are strongly urged to receive communion again.

Yes, the other laws apply, such as the one hour fast before communion.
 
I am under the impression that you are allowed to recieve communion once a day, but if you attend another Mass for other reasons than to fulfill your daily Mass desire, ( funeral, wedding). You must still observe the one hour fasting rule, and only recieve once a day. I would like to know if the fasting requirement holds for the second communion? and if there are any exceptions to these rules, that refer strictly to the laity.
You may receive Communion twice in any given day, provided the second time is at a Mass you’ve attended, regardless of why you attended it.

You could go to two daily Masses, simply to attend; you could go to a daily Mass & a Wedding or Funeral Mass; you could receive Communion at a relative or friend’s hospital bedside and then go to Mass and receive again.

The second time has the same obligations as the first: be in a state of grace & have had nothing to eat or drink (except water or necessary medicine) for one hour before receiving.
 
Thank you for the info. I never knew!

Peace be with you
 
You may receive Communion twice in any given day, provided the second time is at a Mass you’ve attended, regardless of why you attended it.

You could go to two daily Masses, simply to attend; you could go to a daily Mass & a Wedding or Funeral Mass; you could receive Communion at a relative or friend’s hospital bedside and then go to Mass and receive again.

The second time has the same obligations as the first: be in a state of grace & have had nothing to eat or drink (except water or necessary medicine) for one hour before receiving.
A few years ago, as I was confessing, I received a penance requireing me to receive Holy Communion. This confession occured during the same mass I was told to receive and complete my penance. I replyed I did not fast for one hour. The priest told me to receive, I did as was instructed.

Last year I was told that the fasting requirement of one hour applied to me as well as the priest during my assistance/and or ministry at additional mass. If a priest celebrates multiple masses his fasting requirement remains one hour before the original mass. Two is the normal mass schedule yet often many will celebrate as needed.

It appears that the rules, as we view them, are often dismissed or altered to adept to the situation. This is evident by the numerous posting challeging and or labeling actions as abuse. Priest have a different outlook than we seem to hold. I have been told the G.I.R.M. is a guideline to be followed rather than a definitive statement! Check the opening pages of G.I.R.M.
The title itself leads to confusion. General rather than specific instructions.
There seems to be loopholes and exceptions that those that post on this site find uncomprehendable, thus adding to the confusion.
I see no, I repeat no, action in the near future that will change this course of action.
 
A few years ago, as I was confessing, I received a penance requireing me to receive Holy Communion. This confession occured during the same mass I was told to receive and complete my penance. I replyed I did not fast for one hour. The priest told me to receive, I did as was instructed.

Last year I was told that the fasting requirement of one hour applied to me as well as the priest during my assistance/and or ministry at additional mass. If a priest celebrates multiple masses his fasting requirement remains one hour before the original mass. Two is the normal mass schedule yet often many will celebrate as needed.

It appears that the rules, as we view them, are often dismissed or altered to adept to the situation. This is evident by the numerous posting challeging and or labeling actions as abuse. Priest have a different outlook than we seem to hold. I have been told the G.I.R.M. is a guideline to be followed rather than a definitive statement! Check the opening pages of G.I.R.M.
The title itself leads to confusion. General rather than specific instructions.
There seems to be loopholes and exceptions that those that post on this site find uncomprehendable, thus adding to the confusion.
I see no, I repeat no, action in the near future that will change this course of action.
As for what you described, pastors can dispense from the 1-hour fast. Other priests might or might not depending on whether they’ve been given this by the bishop, or even delegated from the pastor.

Can. 1245 Without prejudice to the right of diocesan bishops mentioned in can. 87, for a just cause and according to the prescripts of the diocesan bishop, a pastor can grant in individual cases a dispensation from the obligation of observing a feast day or a day of penance or can grant a commutation of the obligation into other pious works. A superior of a religious institute or society of apostolic life, if they are clerical and of pontifical right, can also do this in regard to his own subjects and others living in the house day and night.
Since the pastor can dispense from the “whole” of the Mass, he can also dispense from any “part of the whole.” The whole is the Mass itself, the part is the 1hour fast.
Moreover, many bishops give priests (even not pastors) the faculty to dispense from the 1hour fast.

As for the fast as it applies to priests, a priest is bound by the 1 hour fast for the first Mass of the day, after that first Mass, the priest is permitted to consume something, but not a full meal before the 2nd Mass or 3rd.

Canon 919 §2. A priest who celebrates the Most Holy Eucharist two or three times on the same day can take something before the second or third celebration even if there is less than one hour between them.

What you posted was correct, although it took me a while to understand the wording.

The word “General” in the GIRM simply means “universal,” not “vague” because it applies to the whole (Latin Rite, Ordinary Form) Church. Certain adaptations to the General Instruction can be made by the conference of bishops with the Holy See’s approval, but that’s beside the point here). Might they have called it the “universal instruction” or something else? Yes. The translators settled on the word “general”–don’t read too much into that. The Latin word is “generalis” so translating that into English makes perfect sense, and a different word would actually be less-correct, even if it might convey a clearer meaning in English.
The same word is used for the General Instruction on the calendar which is very specific.
 
As for what you described, pastors can dispense from the 1-hour fast. Other priests might or might not depending on whether they’ve been given this by the bishop, or even delegated from the pastor.

Can. 1245 Without prejudice to the right of diocesan bishops mentioned in can. 87, for a just cause and according to the prescripts of the diocesan bishop, a pastor can grant in individual cases a dispensation from the obligation of observing a feast day or a day of penance or can grant a commutation of the obligation into other pious works. A superior of a religious institute or society of apostolic life, if they are clerical and of pontifical right, can also do this in regard to his own subjects and others living in the house day and night.
Since the pastor can dispense from the “whole” of the Mass, he can also dispense from any “part of the whole.” The whole is the Mass itself, the part is the 1hour fast.
Moreover, many bishops give priests (even not pastors) the faculty to dispense from the 1hour fast.

As for the fast as it applies to priests, a priest is bound by the 1 hour fast for the first Mass of the day, after that first Mass, the priest is permitted to consume something, but not a full meal before the 2nd Mass or 3rd.

Canon 919 §2. A priest who celebrates the Most Holy Eucharist two or three times on the same day can take something before the second or third celebration even if there is less than one hour between them.

What you posted was correct, although it took me a while to understand the wording.

The word “General” in the GIRM simply means “universal,” not “vague” because it applies to the whole (Latin Rite, Ordinary Form) Church. Certain adaptations to the General Instruction can be made by the conference of bishops with the Holy See’s approval, but that’s beside the point here). Might they have called it the “universal instruction” or something else? Yes. The translators settled on the word “general”–don’t read too much into that. The Latin word is “generalis” so translating that into English makes perfect sense, and a different word would actually be less-correct, even if it might convey a clearer meaning in English.
The same word is used for the General Instruction on the calendar which is very specific./QUOT

Thank you for the response. I learned a little Canon Law today. As for understanding the “wording” I often have that same exact problem with my posts. God Bless!
 
Thanks, Fr. David.

From Canon Law:
Can. 917 - Qui sanctissimam Eucharistiam iam recepit, potest eam iterum eadem die suscipere solummodo intra eucharisticam celebrationem cui participat, salvo praescripto can. 921, §2.
FWIW, the Latin iterum can mean either “again” or “a second time”. Now how do we know this can’t mean “again” as in “again and again”? (After all, they could have used the word secundus to be more specific.) We don’t for certain. However, there are clues that this must be “a second time and no more than twice” because “iterum” is the same word used in the Nicene Creed (et iterum venturus est cum gloria) and there is does mean “a second and last time.” Also if it were more than twice, chances are that they would have used iterum atque iterum. Just my opinion.
 
Thanks, Fr. David.

From Canon Law:

FWIW, the Latin iterum can mean either “again” or “a second time”. Now how do we know this can’t mean “again” as in “again and again”? (After all, they could have used the word secundus.) We don’t for certain. However, there are clues that this must be “a second time and no more than twice” because “iterum” is the same word used in the Nicene Creed (et iterum venturus est cum gloria) and there is does mean “a second and last time.” Also if it were more than twice, chances are that they would have used iterum atque iterum. Just saying.
This question provoked the first authentic interpretation of the 1983 code of Canon Law. A dubium was submitted to Rome and in 1984 the response was that ‘iterum’ in Can. 917 meant ‘twice’ – Pontifical Commission of authentic interpretation of legislative texts 1984
 
This question provoked the first authentic interpretation of the 1983 code of Canon Law. A dubium was submitted to Rome and in 1984 the response was that ‘iterum’ in Can. 917 meant ‘twice’ – Pontifical Commission of authentic interpretation of legislative texts 1984
“Secundum” you mean? 🙂

Thanks for pointing that out.
 
We have 10 Masses every Sunday and three priests to cover all of them. That would mean one of the priests will receive Communion 4 times. I assume our priests must have some dispensation.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top