Reform of the reform

  • Thread starter Thread starter Famule
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
F

Famule

Guest
I was very excited to read on Catholic World News about the talk of bringing the Mass of Vatican II more into keeping with what the council had in mind. It was nice seeing a high ranking Vatican official recognize that things like Mass versus populum, Holy Communion in the hand and altogether giving up on the Latin and Gregorian Chant had not even been contemplated by the council documents. Do you think we will see changes anytime soon in these areas? Does anyone know what is taking so long with the release of the new missal? You tend to hear alot on the subject and then alot of time goes by where you hear nothing.
 
The translation is all that will be different, from what I have read. You will still unfortunately have all those altar girls, priest facing people instead of East, and laity around the altar (EMHC). In other words a protestant Mass with a new translation.
 
Do you think we will see changes anytime soon in these areas?
I would guess that those priests who are already predisposed to pay attention to the example set by the Holy Father, and who keep an ear open to the things being said by people like Archbishop Ranjith, and who try to celebrate the liturgy properly, are the ones who would begin refining the celebration of the liturgy in their parishes. I do not know how much will come from Rome as instructions rather than examples.
Does anyone know what is taking so long with the release of the new missal?
Rome wants to expedite the process and have the new translation done and in use by Advent of 2010!
 
I was very excited to read on Catholic World News about the talk of bringing the Mass of Vatican II more into keeping with what the council had in mind. It was nice seeing a high ranking Vatican official recognize that things like Mass versus populum, Holy Communion in the hand and altogether giving up on the Latin and Gregorian Chant had not even been contemplated by the council documents. Do you think we will see changes anytime soon in these areas?
First of all, I’ll offer a small correction: the Missal of 1970 (the OF) is not the “Mass of Vatican II.” If anything was, it was the short-lived (and ill-fated) “interim Missal” of 1965.

Anyway, what is called the “reform of the reform” is the OF with all the rubrics followed as written, with the Propers, offered ad orientem, and done all in Latin. Although I haven’t seen it myself, the “reform of the reform” actually does exist but it seems to be a rare duck. I know it’s done in Chicago (at S John Cantius, and maybe elsewhere there) and I think in Toronto (at the Oratory?). From what I’ve heard, it’s done elsewhere too, but as I said, it’s rather rare. Most people are not likely to find it at their local parish. Variations (e.g. mixed language, etc) are done as well. One might say that the normal EWTN style is one of the variants.
Does anyone know what is taking so long with the release of the new missal? You tend to hear alot on the subject and then alot of time goes by where you hear nothing.
It’s not exactly a “new missal” and doesn’t mandate the “reform of the reform” (whether in whole or in any of its variants). Rather, it’s a new English translation of the current OF missal, designed to correct some of the most glaring mis-translations of the past 40 years, and to restore some dignity to the English used.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top