M
MaryRose35
Guest
Those who prefer the new Mass (with all its abuses) to the Old (which is aomost abuse free) always try to find something wrong with the Old Mass. Since it is usually done very reverently, all they can do is claim that some Priests say the prayers to fast. Is this the only complaint they can find? Not bad compared to what takes place on a regular basis in the New Mas.You are correct. The way the editing was done does make it seem like there are no pauses between lines. It’s a straw dog argument.
For those who have probably never been to a Traditional Mass, yet complain that the Priests say the Old Mass in Latin to fast, I sure hope they say their Rosary very slowly, always pausing for each comma, or they are hypocrites.
It is also worth noting that the Latin language is a fast sounding language. Consider how fast Spanish sounds to Americans. Latin, which is similar to spanish, also sounds fast. That is just a peculiarity of the language.
Also, if you compare the prayers of the Latin Mass along side the English translation in the missal, you will notice that often the Latin prayers are much shorter. What I mean is, it takes fewer words to say the prayer in Latin that it does in English.
I think those who complain about the speed that some Priests say the Latin Mass are simply looking for anything to complain about in that Mass to justify the many abuses in the New Mass.
But this might be interesting. ** In the video we are discussing, I wonder if the Priest who says the New Mass pauses for each comma, when he says “In the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost”, like Rand Al Thor complained about in the Old Mass? Or if he says the words without a pause between them? Maybe someone can look for that when they view the video. I bet he doesn’t pause, but runs the words together. **
If this is so, why didn’t Rand Al Thor complain about the Priest not pausing in the Novus Ordo Mass? The answer is obvious.