Refusing Medical Treatments

[notself]

You’re welcome. A list of vaccines created in this way is here.

You need to provide a second source than the one here. The polio vaccine was developed in monkeys. I haven’t spent the time to check the other claims. Here is a short history of the development of the polio vaccine from Wiki. The bold is mine.

Main article: Polio vaccine

A child receives oral polio vaccineTwo vaccines are used throughout the world to combat polio. Both vaccines induce immunity to polio, efficiently blocking person-to-person transmission of wild poliovirus, thereby protecting both individual vaccine recipients and the wider community (so-called herd immunity).[61] The first inactivated virus vaccine was developed in 1952 by Jonas Salk, and announced to the world on April 12, 1955.[62] The **Salk vaccine, or inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV), is based on poliovirus grown in a type of monkey kidney tissue culture **(Vero cell line), which is chemically inactivated with formalin.[11] After two doses of IPV (given by injection), 90% or more of individuals develop protective antibody to all three serotypes of poliovirus, and at least 99% are immune to poliovirus following three doses.[4]

Subsequently, Albert Sabin developed an oral polio vaccine (OPV) using live but weakened (attenuated) virus, produced by the** repeated passage of the virus through non-human cells **at sub-physiological temperatures.[63] Human trials of Sabin’s vaccine began in 1957 and it was licensed in 1962.[64] The attenuated poliovirus in the Sabin vaccine replicates very efficiently in the gut, the primary site of wild poliovirus infection and replication, but the vaccine strain is unable to replicate efficiently within nervous system tissue.[65] A single dose of oral polio vaccine produces immunity to all three poliovirus serotypes in approximately 50% of recipients. Three doses of live-attenuated OPV produce protective antibody to all three poliovirus types in more than 95% of recipients.[4]

 

[Ethan_Enoch]

You need to provide a second source than the one here. The polio vaccine was developed in monkeys. I haven’t spent the time to check the other claims. Here is a short history of the development of the polio vaccine from Wiki. The bold is mine.

Dr. Salk’s vaccine was indeed developed using monkey organ tissue, however, it is not the only polio vaccine. On the page I linked to the vaccines Poliovax, Pentacel, Infrarex Hexa, and Quadracel were mentioned. These were developed using cells derived from the lungs of a baby aborted in 1966. Dr. Salk’s vaccine was developed in 1952. These are different vaccines.

Here is a document from the federal Department of Health and Human Services, which states concerning Poliovax:

“Because this vaccine is more consistently immunogenic than that which was previously available, it is intended to replace the monkey kidney cell derived Poliovirus Vaccine…”

and,

“This Inactivated poliovirus vaccine is produced using cells from a human diploid cell line, MRC-5 cells…”

This website tells where MRC-5 cells come from.

 

[Ethan_Enoch]

So where do they get the aborted kids’ bodies from?

Mostly from Sweden, since Sweden was a country that permitted abortions back in the sixties when they started all this.

Actually abortion was first legalized in Sweden in 1938 if it was for a “medical, humanitarian, or eugenical” reason.

 

[Robertsxxx]

Mostly from Sweden, since Sweden was a country that permitted abortions back in the sixties when they started all this.

Actually abortion was first legalized in Sweden in 1938 if it was for a “medical, humanitarian, or eugenical” reason.

No, I mean WHERE do they get the bodies from? Are those already dead corpses that would have been disposed of anyway? Except now, instead of being thrown out, they are used to help others by developing meds?

 

[Ethan_Enoch]

No, I mean WHERE do they get the bodies from? Are those already dead corpses that would have been disposed of anyway? Except now, instead of being thrown out, they are used to help others by developing meds?

Well, they actually have to keep some of the tissue “alive” (like in an organ transplant) so the organs must be collected immediately after the death of the child. Thus, the abortionist must be purposing to use the body, even as he is killing it. In this way it is not like going through dead corpses. However, it is likely that in many, or most of these cases the mother would have chosen to have the baby aborted anyway; the Swedish abortions were all “legal”.

In some cases, however, it’s clear that there was at least some pressure put on the mother to abort. From the page I linked to earlier:

However, according to the Centers for Disease Control, an estimated 20%-25% of women who contract rubella during the first trimester of pregnancy could pass on Congenital Rubella Syndrome (CRS) to their unborn child. CRS can cause birth defects including deafness, cataracts, heart defects, mental retardation, and liver and spleen damage. Preying on this fear during the 1964 epidemic, some doctors in Pennsylvania began advising pregnant women who contracted the disease to abort their child. In a controlled study group, the Wistar Institute worked directly with the abortionists to collect and dissect the fetuses. It was from the 27th fetus that researchers extracted the live virus in the kidney of the baby to be used in the rubella vaccine.

 

[notself]

Good Grief

 

[Joe_Kelley]

No, I mean WHERE do they get the bodies from? Are those already dead corpses that would have been disposed of anyway? Except now, instead of being thrown out, they are used to help others by developing meds?

Much like the Germans using the corpses of Jews who were being killed anyway.