L
Lehl
Guest
:blushing:Lehl,
And you’re invited to repent as well.
Love you like I can without it being creepy,
A Pac
Right back at you.
:blushing:Lehl,
And you’re invited to repent as well.
Love you like I can without it being creepy,
A Pac
then explain who wons the kirtland temple and how they got it.The Kirtland Temple suit was dismissed–it didn’t go against the LDS Church.
The actual decision found against the RLDS Church and dismissed the case. The RLDS Church failed to publish the decision and for 60 years claimed that it had won the case. However, in the 1940’s they sort of came clean and published the entire judgment which says: "The Plaintiff is not in possession thereof. And thereupon the Court finds as a matter of law that the Plaintiff is not entitled to the judgment or relief prayed for in its petition. And thereupon it is ordered and adjudged that this action be dismissed at the costs of the Plaintiff.”—Book “T”, Common Pleas Record, Lake County, Ohio, page 488, Lake County Courthouse, Painesvile, Ohio).
The Temple Lot suit didn’t involve the LDS Church except for witness testimony. The Temple Lot was owned by the Church of Christ (Temple Lot) and the RLDS Church sued them for title. The RLDS Church initially won but it was reversed on appeal.
Alma
Then your church has not taken adequate measures IN PRESENT TIMES to prevent what I have experienced. Sorry to burst your bubble, but, given what I have experienced, according to your standards, I would estimate that half of the currently practicing members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints should be exed. As for court cases,No. They are not. The leadership of the LDS Church has taken great exception, and gone to great lengths to explain that they are in no way connected to the chruch; and that any philosophical similarities are simply that, although they be completely separate entities. Taken to extremes, there are even court cases to support this distinction.
Just because you’re ignorant of them doesn’t make them inadequate. Moreover, what the heck are you talking about and how does it have anything to do with fundamentalist associations?Then your church has not taken adequate measures IN PRESENT TIMES to prevent what I have experienced.
According to you? Last time I checked, you are neither an expert nor an authority. Moreover, you exaggerate tremendously and completely irresponsible in the the things you publicly promulgate. Funny…considering how many Popes of your church should have been exed. Sticks and stones, love.Sorry to burst your bubble, but, given what I have experienced, according to your standards, I would estimate that half of the currently practicing members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints should be exed.
Well, you’re an ignoramous when it comes to the law and you don’t know what you’re talking about. Besides, what “negligence” is there in referring to the fundamentalist relationships? You want to talk about negligence…let’s talk about it in the Catholic Church with child molesting priests.As for court cases, given what I have experienced, that negligence makes your church liable.