That is not correct. The prophet promised was to be from the brethren of the Israelis, not necessarily an Israeli. The Ishmaelis are the bretheren of the Israelis.
First, in order to refute your assertion and prove that the promise identifies “the prophet” as an Israelite, we should see what the word “brethren” refers to in Deuteronomy:
Deuteronomy 17: 14-15
When thou art come into the land, which the Lord thy God will give thee, and possessest it, and shalt say: I will set a king over me, as all nations have that are round about: Thou shalt set him whom the Lord thy God shall choose out of the number of
thy brethren. Thou mayst not make
a man of another nation king, that is not thy brother.
**Deuteronomy 18:1-2 **
The priests and Levites, and all that are of the same tribe, shall have no part nor inheritance with
the rest of Israel, because they shall eat the sacrifices of the Lord, and his oblations, And they shall receive nothing else of the possession of
their brethren.
Both of the verses quoted above mean that the promised prophet must be an Israelite, for the word brethren pertains to the same members of the Israelite community and the brotherhood of other nations is overtly denied.
Second, there is no verse in Deuteronomy 18 that highlights the racial brotherhood between Israelites and Ishmaelites. Neither Moses nor God makes an assocaition between the promised prophet and Ishmael’s descendants.
Third, God in the Torah recurrently singles out Israel as the only chosen nation and thus slams the door on any possible association between Ishmaelites and Israelites. For the God of Moses there are two nations: Israel and “others” (including Ishmaelites).
Fourth, while interpreting the verse in question, Muslims restrict the notion of brotherhood to racial affiliation disregarding the primary significance of monotheism for the God of Torah. What they fail to see is that it is impossible for God to identify a pagan nation as brothers of His elected Israel. Moses, who slays true Israelites that choose idolatry, cannot have designated pagan Ishmaelites as his brothers. Consequently, it is impossible for Arabs, who were idolaters before Islam like Mohammad himself, to be the brethren from among whom the prophet would be sent.
Also, the prophet was to be the like of Moses. In the Israelis, there never came a prophet the like of Moses at all. Jesus was not like Moses. He was a complicated mixture of things, being a god and a prophet at the same time, and being a son of God. Tell me “Was Moses a son of God?” That proves Jesus cannot be that Prophet of the Deut 18:18. So Waraqah was on the right lines
Your argument is full of logical fallacies. First, you cannot expect Jesus to be similar to Moses in everything, for the verse says the prophet will be LIKE Moses, not IDENTICAL with Moses. According to your reasoning, Mohammad cannot be the promised prophet either since you Muslims believe that Moses was sent to Israel whereas Mohammad was sent to the whole mankind!
If you read the New Testament, you can readily find many similarities between Moses and Jesus. Even the way we name the Jewish and Christian scripture (Old Testament and New Testament) point out a certain similarity between Moses and Jesus.) Above all, Jesus is THE PROPHET because He was a Jew and Israelite, one sent to Israel from among the Israelites. The verse in the Torah says God will give ISRAEL a prophet like Moses. Since Mohammad never preached in Israel, he cannot be the prophet.
