C
cheese_sdc
Guest
Sure.Thank you for your honesty. I hope you do come back. Can I ask another question to gain a sharper edge of clarity on your last statement about conscience? Thanks in advance for your patience…
Sure.Thank you for your honesty. I hope you do come back. Can I ask another question to gain a sharper edge of clarity on your last statement about conscience? Thanks in advance for your patience…
Gaudium et Spes:Thanks for your willingness…
Given the logic regarding conscience - if one who holds this view would disagree say with the Trinity but in good conscience - they could then disagree with the magisterium without any negative consequence to the state of their soul?
Essentially, conscience trumps the magisterium given the right set of circumstances as indicated?
You have another question?Yes - I am familiar with that passage from GES. Tired of this yet? I won’t be offended if you say “yes” - in fact, you can reply with a “go away” command and I will likely do so…
Still, do be careful. In your instance Satan was blatant about letting himself or his minions become detected by you in some way. More often than not in today’s world, he’s more subtle and hardly perceptible in our day to day lives. In fact, I have trouble percieving evil influences usually until it’s too late.This is what I have found to be true as well. I think that this can be true, and that most of the time, the “spirit” involved is the participant’s own ego. At least, this is what I’ve experienced. Incidently, all of the above happened before I started using reiki, and why I would be extraordinarily sensitive to any malevolent influences with reiki (I have yet to experience any).
I do not pretend to understand everything about the metaphysical which surrounds us. I just try to muddle through as best I can. I know that I understand more now than I did a few years ago, but I’m still like a blind baby in a zoo.Still, do be careful. In your instance Satan was blatant about letting himself or his minions become detected by you in some way. More often than not in today’s world, he’s more subtle and hardly perceptible in our day to day lives. In fact, I have trouble percieving evil influences usually until it’s too late.
So please be careful - we’re not saying these things because we want to push our beliefs on you, but because we genuinely care about your well being.
God Bless,
Snert
One thing that has always (even in my seminary years) was the mixed message that the Church gives about conscience. In one instance the Church says that a person has complete freedom to follow their conscience. Indeed, I thought that the passage “For man has in his heart a law written by God; to obey it is the very dignity of man; according to it he will be judged.” is powerful. A person will be judged according to their conscience - that is giving complete freedom and responsibility to people.Here’s GES 50
Married people should realize that in their behaviour they may not simply follow their own fancy but must be ruled by conscience- and conscience ought to be conformed to the law of God in the light of the teaching authority of the Church, which is the authentic interpreter of divine law. For the divine law throws light on the meaning of married love, protects it and leads it to truly human fulfillment.
The key is, what did the Church mean by the section you quoted? This is one of the passages that reveals the key. The standard of measure of all matters of conscience is the magisterium (ordinary - as with local bishops in the case of Reiki, or extraordinary as with universal declarations such as the ex-cathedra pronouncements). Either way, we know if our conscience is properly formed as we test it against the teachings of the Church…
Personally, I just think the subject fizzled out, like all the threads do here. Perhaps, though, to renew your views and spur debate, you should start a new thread in another category. Probably many see the word ‘reiki’ and won’t view the thread to see your comments. But when you start a new one, they will become interested in that particular topic and most likely others who would otherwise skip over this particular thread will join in.I’ve been thinking about the lack of response to my last post. And I wonder if it doesn’t illustrate the weakness of conservative Catholicism (as practiced and advocated here). It seems that there were two arguments - one from authority (the bishops said it!) and one from fear (the devil will get you!).
When those two arguments were rejected then there was nothing. Is that all there is to Catholicism apologetic debate? Authority and fear?
Good point.Personally, I just think the subject fizzled out, like all the threads do here. Perhaps, though, to renew your views and spur debate, you should start a new thread in another category. Probably many see the word ‘reiki’ and won’t view the thread to see your comments. But when you start a new one, they will become interested in that particular topic and most likely others who would otherwise skip over this particular thread will join in.
God Bless,
Snert
I might be willing to engage you on the some of these conscience questions if you are still interested (though I am a bit ametuer on some parts of my catechism).One thing that has always (even in my seminary years) was the mixed message that the Church gives about conscience. In one instance the Church says that a person has complete freedom to follow their conscience. Indeed, I thought that the passage “For man has in his heart a law written by God; to obey it is the very dignity of man; according to it he will be judged.” is powerful. A person will be judged according to their conscience - that is giving complete freedom and responsibility to people.
And the libertarian in me applauds that.
But then, there is the message, much like an anxious parent, “But you’re conscience is only correct if you do what I tell you to do!”.
Sorry guys, to my thinking, it is one way or the other. If I tell my daughter that she can do whatever she wants, but then punish her when she does something I don’t want her to do, I will turn her into a nervous wreck.
The Church has some extraordinarily beautiful things going for it. The sacraments, sacramentals, a theology which embraces the physical world, and a sense of compassion. Nostra Aetate is one of the most incredible religious writings I’ve had the priviledge to study. Imagine, one of the world’s religions saying that “a ray of Truth” illuminates all religions. That is powerful! And It is those things which will win people over to it, not a religious Nanny State with the bishops as Daddy.
The idea of the Eucharist - God becomes our very food? Geez, that is pure poetry. And couple that with the idea that “you are what you eat” - to share, it whatever limited way, in Divinity. Those are the things that keep people catholic and bring them into the Church. Not exorcisms and the magistrium.
I used to absolutely hate it when a parish would start pushing for Eucharistic Adoration, not because of any animosity toward the Blessed Sacrament, but because invariably the advertising pitch would consist of the the scripture verse, “Could you not wait one hour with me…” I’d literally pull my hair out - here Catholics have a chance to experience one of the great spiritual gifts in history, and the best advertising hook they can do is guilt!!! Come on. There are so many more hooks to use, but Catholics gotta go for the guilt.
Sorry, I rambled a bit in my rant.![]()