Religion and Science!

  • Thread starter Thread starter tonyrey
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Finally, being a nitty-gritty personality, I have, on my own, started exploring why Catholics are losing interest in the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass. When symbolism creeps into the basic Catholic understanding (transubstantiation) of the Real Presence of Jesus Christ, participating in the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass loses significance. (Note: please do not confuse add-on “symbolic” interpretation with Catholic definitions of reality.)
People are not losing interest in our parish – the Masses are thronged.
 
Defective logic!

It doesn’t follow from the fact that God creates everything that every thing can explain every other thing - and certainly not persons who are made in the image of God…
Tonrey, do you not believe it is possible for God to bring forth everything?
 
Defective logic!

It doesn’t follow from the fact that God creates everything that every thing can explain every other thing - and certainly not persons who are made in the image of God…
What I was suggesting is that since everything exists because of God, pointing it out in the case of persons alone doesn’t offer much explanation of itself, since ultimately it all gets grounded in the physical anyway. For instance, Ratzinger is talking of spirit here but can’t avoid the physical in his explanation: The clay became man at the moment in which a being for the first time was capable of forming, however dimly, the thought of “God”. The first Thou that—however stammeringly—was said by human lips to God marks the moment in which the spirit arose in the world.
 
]Ratzinger
is talking of spirit here but can’t avoid the physical in his explanation: The clay became man at the moment in which a being for the first time was capable of forming, however dimly, the thought of “God”. The first Thou that—however stammeringly—was said by human lips to God marks the moment in which the spirit arose in the world.

Inocente, let me take exception here. In a Catholic sacramental vision of the cosmos, “Spirit” has never been absent from the world. There was never a time the world was not imbued with God’s spirit.

A student of evolutionary cosmology as astute as Cardinal Ratzinger / Pope Benedict is not going to miss the consonance between the spirituality of an ancient and dynamic universe and the words of Genesis 1:1-2: “In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. 2 Now the earth was formless and empty, darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was hovering over the waters.”

StAnastasia
 
inocente

**But you didn’t really answer my question, which was if the CCC, the Pope and the Bible spend a lot more time on Christ than Genesis, why do you think Genesis has assumed such importance to others, even in the face of evidence that it pushes young people out of church? **

Genesis doesn’t push people out of the Church. People pull themselves out of the Church for any number of reasons, but Genesis is certainly not one of them by a long shot. 😉
 
You hinted that it wouldn’t matter if science disposed of it.
This statement doesn’t seems to tally with:
But I’m not worried that an explanation of free will explains it away.
“The role religion plays for such scientists in interpreting reality seems negligible and hardly distinguishable from deism.”
The same is true for plumbers and electricians, who approach their jobs as if the pipes and wires don’t have God hidden inside them. Agnostic or atheeplumbing!

It doesn’t seem appropriate to compare the role of plumbers and electricians with the role of the Creator… This is precisely the crux of the issue because your statement suggests that the God revealed by Our Lord never intervenes in human affairs.
I expect a person who claims to be a Catholic to explain briefly how the scope of religion is related to the scope of science - since it seems to be in the process of being whittled down to negligible proportions…
Truth or dare? You’re on. You go first!
  1. Religion is concerned with the whole of Creation whereas science is restricted to one aspect of reality.
  2. The Creator is not a passive Observer but a loving Father who actively cares for His children.
  3. There have been many scientifically inexplicable events throughout history confirming the teaching of Jesus that prayers are answered and that miracles occur.
  4. It is absurd to believe an infinitely powerful and loving Creator would never intervene to prevent unnecessary suffering and to guide the course of evolution.
 
This statement doesn’t seems to tally with:
Yes it tallies!
It doesn’t seem appropriate to compare the role of plumbers and electricians with the role of the Creator…
I’m not. I’m comparing the role of plumber with the role of biologist.
This is precisely the crux of the issue because your statement suggests that the God revealed by Our Lord never intervenes in human affairs.
I never said that; those are your words.
  1. Religion is concerned with the whole of Creation whereas science is restricted to one aspect of reality.
True.
  1. The Creator is not a passive Observer but a loving Father who actively cares for His children.
True.
  1. There have been many scientifically inexplicable events throughout history confirming the teaching of Jesus that prayers are answered and that miracles occur.
Some of these have been explained, some have not.
  1. It is absurd to believe an infinitely powerful and loving Creator would never intervene to prevent unnecessary suffering and to guide the course of evolution.
Again, your words, not mine. Some instances of horrible suffering not prevented by a loving God. I’m sure you will have an answer for these:

Ancient conquests that destroyed families and killed or enslaved millions of people, including young children.
The Black Death (bubonic plague) of 1348-50.
Hundred Years’ War
Thirty Years’ Wat
The Fire of London (1666)
Mayan and Aztec human sacrifice allowed to proceed unchecked for centuries.
1556 Shaanxi earthquake (830,000 dead)
Enslavement of Africans
The Hindenburg disaster
Sinking of the Titanic, Lusitania, and numerous other vessels
Soviet famine of 1932–1933 (Holodomor) 7-10 million dead
Bombing of Pearl harbor, Dresden, Hiroshima, Nagasaki
World War I
World War II
The Nazi “Holocaust”
Japanese Internment
Destruction of the World Trade Towers
Japanese tsunami of 2011
Lou Gehrig’s Disease
Alzheimer’s Disease
Huntington’s chorea
Fibrodisplaysia Ossificans Progressiva that turns all a child’s muscles into a second skeleton before it kills her
Cancers of all sorts
 
This statement doesn’t seems to tally with:
It doesn’t seem appropriate to compare the role of plumbers and electricians with the role of the Creator… This is precisely the crux of the issue because your statement suggests that the God revealed by Our Lord never intervenes in human affairs.
  1. Religion is concerned with the whole of Creation whereas science is restricted to one aspect of reality.
  2. The Creator is not a passive Observer but a loving Father who actively cares for His children.
  3. There have been many scientifically inexplicable events throughout history confirming the teaching of Jesus that prayers are answered and that miracles occur.
  4. It is absurd to believe an infinitely powerful and loving Creator would never intervene to prevent unnecessary suffering and to guide the course of evolution.
I think the view that God needs to work through “scientifically inexplicable” events is too narrow. God isn’t limited in this way.

He who designed and created time, space, matter, and energy can surely design his plan to unfold by “natural” means just as well, including use of “chaotic” and “random” phenomena that are inevitably just beyond our ability to measure and predict.
 
StAnastasia

****Again, your words, not mine. Some instances of horrible suffering not prevented by a loving God. I’m sure you will have an answer for these:

Ancient conquests that destroyed families and killed or enslaved millions of people, including young children.
The Black Death (bubonic plague) of 1348-50.
Hundred Years’ War
Thirty Years’ Wat
The Fire of London (1666)
Mayan and Aztec human sacrifice allowed to proceed unchecked for centuries.
1556 Shaanxi earthquake (830,000 dead)
Enslavement of Africans
The Hindenburg disaster
Sinking of the Titanic, Lusitania, and numerous other vessels
Soviet famine of 1932–1933 (Holodomor) 7-10 million dead
Bombing of Pearl harbor, Dresden, Hiroshima, Nagasaki
World War I
World War II
The Nazi “Holocaust”
Japanese Internment
Destruction of the World Trade Towers
Japanese tsunami of 2011
Lou Gehrig’s Disease
Alzheimer’s Disease
Huntington’s chorea
Fibrodisplaysia Ossificans Progressiva that turns all a child’s muscles into a second skeleton before it kills her
Cancers of all sorts ****

I expect God has the answers, even if we don’t.

Do you not believe there is a God who has the answers?
 
I think the view that God needs to work through “scientifically inexplicable” events is too narrow. God isn’t limited in this way.
I agree.
He who designed and created time, space, matter, and energy can surely design his plan to unfold by “natural” means just as well, including use of “chaotic” and “random” phenomena that are inevitably just beyond our ability to measure and predict.
That would be consonant with Genesis 1:11, 1:20, 1:24.
 
I think the view that God needs to work through “scientifically inexplicable” events is too narrow. God isn’t limited in this way.

He who designed and created time, space, matter, and energy can surely design his plan to unfold by “natural” means just as well, including use of “chaotic” and “random” phenomena that are inevitably just beyond our ability to measure and predict.
People, who view the world through the lens of science, can easily agree and that is wonderful in itself.

However, when one uses only the lens of the empirical method, one experiences extreme difficulty in finding the spiritual soul which connects humans to our Creator God. It isn’t that our ability to measure and predict events in the material/physical domain is faulty; it is that God and the spiritual soul are in a different domain.

Obviously, our Creator God can use “natural” means to unfold His plan for the cosmos. What some, not all, people with only scientific vision may miss is that God is “supernatural” when it came to the creation of the human person, you and I. Our human nature unites both the natural domain and the supernatural domain into one single person, you, me, who belong to an unique species founded in an unique manner.
 
Yes it tallies!
Please explain how.
It doesn’t seem appropriate to compare the role of plumbers and electricians with the role of the Creator…
I’m not. I’m comparing the role of plumber with the role of biologist.

Why?
This is precisely the crux of the issue because your statement suggests that the God revealed by Our Lord never intervenes in human affairs.
I never said that; those are your words.

Please explain when and how God intervenes in human affairs.
  1. Religion is concerned with the whole of Creation whereas science is restricted to one aspect of reality.
True.

So science cannot explain the spiritual aspect of reality?
  1. The Creator is not a passive Observer but a loving Father who actively cares for His children.
True.

What evidence is there that He cares?
  1. There have been many scientifically inexplicable events throughout history confirming the teaching of Jesus that prayers are answered and that miracles occur.
Some of these have been explained, some have not.

Can science explain in principle every apparent miracle and answer to prayer?
  1. It is absurd to believe an infinitely powerful and loving Creator would never intervene to prevent unnecessary suffering and to guide the course of evolution.
Again, your words, not mine. Some instances of horrible suffering not prevented by a loving God. I’m sure you will have an answer for these:

Ancient conquests that destroyed families and killed or enslaved millions of people, including young children.
The Black Death (bubonic plague) of 1348-50.
Hundred Years’ War
Thirty Years’ Wat
The Fire of London (1666)
Mayan and Aztec human sacrifice allowed to proceed unchecked for centuries.
1556 Shaanxi earthquake (830,000 dead)
Enslavement of Africans
The Hindenburg disaster
Sinking of the Titanic, Lusitania, and numerous other vessels
Soviet famine of 1932–1933 (Holodomor) 7-10 million dead
Bombing of Pearl harbor, Dresden, Hiroshima, Nagasaki
World War I
World War II
The Nazi “Holocaust”
Japanese Internment
Destruction of the World Trade Towers
Japanese tsunami of 2011
Lou Gehrig’s Disease
Alzheimer’s Disease
Huntington’s chorea
Fibrodisplaysia Ossificans Progressiva that turns all a child’s muscles into a second skeleton before it kills her
Cancers of all sorts
  1. Is your list of evils conclusive evidence that horrible suffering is never prevented by a loving God?
  2. Do you regard it as conclusive evidence that God is not omnipotent or not infinitely good?
  3. How do you reconcile those evils with your Christian faith - or do you think it is impossible?
  4. If it is impossible why are you a Christian?
 
I think the view that God needs to work through “scientifically inexplicable” events is too narrow. God isn’t limited in this way.

He who designed and created time, space, matter, and energy can surely design his plan to unfold by “natural” means just as well, including use of “chaotic” and “random” phenomena that are inevitably just beyond our ability to measure and predict.
  1. Do you believe God **never **works through scientifically inexplicable events?
  2. Do you reject **all **miracles?
 
It doesn’t follow from the fact that God creates everything that every thing
can explain every other thing - and certainly not persons who are made in the image of God…
Tonrey, do you not believe it is possible for God to bring forth everything?
Of course I do but that doesn’t mean God made the soul out of physical particles…

No response!
 
I think the view that God needs to work through “scientifically inexplicable” events is too narrow. God isn’t limited in this way.
He who designed and created time, space, matter, and energy can surely design his plan to unfold by “natural” means just as well, including use of “chaotic” and “random” phenomena that are inevitably just beyond our ability to measure and predict.
That would be consonant with Genesis 1:11, 1:20, 1:24.

Do you believe the soul unfolded** by natural means **including the use of chaotic and random phenomena?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top