He looked at the atheist and said, “How can they make an informed choice if they’ve never been exposed to the faith?”
Both parents were wrong. Whether you think you are right or not, you need to give your children the information they need so that they can make their own decisions.
I think the judge might have done well to point out that the child needed to be taught to question both parents beliefs. A court order that the child attend classes on comparative religion might have been a good idea. Except that the child might have been too young to understand the concepts.
Which should, in that case, prompt a question as to whether he or she should be described as a Catholic or an atheist if they don’t understand the meaning of the terms. Not that I’ve ever heard of a child being described as an atheist…
One of the most important aspects of being a parent (perhaps the most important), is to give your children as much freedom as you possibly can,
commensurate with their safety. That’s freedom of association, freedom of speech, freedom of thought and freedom of movement. You might recognise some of those freedoms as being codified in some document or other.
That is not carte blanche to allow anything and everything, especially at a young age, but let the leash grow longer as they grow older.
Explain to them how you got to be who you are and where you are, but don’t expect them to follow the same paths. And get them to develop a healthy scepticism. It will serve them well.