Religious Education Faithful to Church Doctrine

  • Thread starter Thread starter Elzee
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
E

Elzee

Guest
Our parish and school will soon be looking into replacing its Religious Education curriculum for children - K through 8. I’ve come to realize there are a BUNCH of choices available and we will need to narrow our search. Can you guys recommend some options that are faithful to church teaching? Our parish is ‘liberal’ so I see this as an opportunity to try and get some orthodox instruction to our kids if I can succeed in presenting some reasons for or against some curriculum options.

So far, various people have suggested the following ‘good ones’ (but haven’t given any specifics on why they think they are good).
  • Sadlier’s curriculum (not sure of the name)
  • Christ Our Life
  • Faith and Life
  • something by Burnett…??
I’d apprecate any help you can give me on curriculums to consider (and why) and ones to avoid (and why).

Also - does anyone have any suggsetions on how to go about reviewing / critiquing religous ed curriculum?
 
your DRE is probably bound by the list of approved textbook series from the diocese. the best bare none is Faith and Life from Ignatius press, the second best is Image of God, also by Ignatius. Many dioceses don’t approve them because their catechetics office is very liberal and wouldn’t know a good orthodox text if it jump up and bit them.

The next choice would be Christ Our Life from Loyola Press, written by the Sisters of Notre Dame of Chardon Ohio, excellent catechist manuals and supporting materials.

Neither of those 2 is available in Spanish. If that is a consideration, Silver Burdett has an new program, Blest are We, that is available in both English and Spanish, but catechist guides are not bilingual. their older series was approved by most dioceses and used by many because the books and catechists guides were very easy to use by teachers with little or no experience or knowledge of the faith.

Sadlier’s new series, recently approved to conform with the Catechism is We Believe (Creemos in Spanish). It does not teach any error, but it is weak because of what it leaves out - full understanding of the Eucharist as a sacrifice, not merely a shared meal or community celebration, for example.

Benziger is simply not acceptable.

If you are serving on a committee to evaluate textbooks, get the guidelines from your diocese first, and they may also have sample copies, although the publisher’s sales rep in your area will probably give you free samples. Look at both the catechist manuals and the textbooks, because you want to have resources your catechists can use. Some publishers have a video for the catechists on how to use the manual.

for a quickie determination on the soundness and reliability of the text look at two area: how the Eucharist is presented in the 2nd grade and 5th grade texts (usually where the sacraments are taught) as well as the supporting material intended for catechists and parents. Is the Eucharist presented as a sacrifice and is the Real Presence stressed and made unambiguous? Is the true nature of the sacrificial priesthood presented in the context of the Eucharist and other sacraments? Is the Mass presented as something we do as a community, or something Jesus does and we participate in, thereby partaking in His community?

Next, look at the material on confession, penance, and morality. Is original sin and the need for salvation presented, and is morality presented as offense against God’s commands, or as mere “mistakes” and “poor choices”, and is the discussion of the nature of evil and of redemption sound?
 
40.png
puzzleannie:
your DRE is probably bound by the list of approved textbook series from the diocese. the best bare none is Faith and Life from Ignatius press, the second best is Image of God, also by Ignatius. Many dioceses don’t approve them because their catechetics office is very liberal and wouldn’t know a good orthodox text if it jump up and bit them.

The next choice would be Christ Our Life from Loyola Press, written by the Sisters of Notre Dame of Chardon Ohio, excellent catechist manuals and supporting materials.

Neither of those 2 is available in Spanish. If that is a consideration, Silver Burdett has an new program, Blest are We, that is available in both English and Spanish, but catechist guides are not bilingual. their older series was approved by most dioceses and used by many because the books and catechists guides were very easy to use by teachers with little or no experience or knowledge of the faith.

Sadlier’s new series, recently approved to conform with the Catechism is We Believe (Creemos in Spanish). It does not teach any error, but it is weak because of what it leaves out - full understanding of the Eucharist as a sacrifice, not merely a shared meal or community celebration, for example.

Benziger is simply not acceptable.

If you are serving on a committee to evaluate textbooks, get the guidelines from your diocese first, and they may also have sample copies, although the publisher’s sales rep in your area will probably give you free samples. Look at both the catechist manuals and the textbooks, because you want to have resources your catechists can use. Some publishers have a video for the catechists on how to use the manual.

for a quickie determination on the soundness and reliability of the text look at two area: how the Eucharist is presented in the 2nd grade and 5th grade texts (usually where the sacraments are taught) as well as the supporting material intended for catechists and parents. Is the Eucharist presented as a sacrifice and is the Real Presence stressed and made unambiguous? Is the true nature of the sacrificial priesthood presented in the context of the Eucharist and other sacraments? Is the Mass presented as something we do as a community, or something Jesus does and we participate in, thereby partaking in His community?

Next, look at the material on confession, penance, and morality. Is original sin and the need for salvation presented, and is morality presented as offense against God’s commands, or as mere “mistakes” and “poor choices”, and is the discussion of the nature of evil and of redemption sound?
Thank you so much. Spanish is not a consideration for us.

Why is Benzinger not acceptable?

I have heard through the grapevine that our priest does not like ‘Faith and Life’ because it is too much like the Baltimore Catechism - I have no idea what he would mean by that even though I’m a little familiar with the Baltimore Catechism. But, given the nature of our parish and what I’ve just read about Faith and Life on-line *(which in my opinion sounds AWESOME - CCC references, strong biblical text, strong on Catholic doctrine, the Mass as a sacrifice, mortal/venial sin, etc.) *I can’t say I’m surprised. All of the items you’ve told me to consider are the items that, unfortunately, I’m going to have a difficult time with in terms of convincing our decision-makers of their importance. We never hear about sin or the CCC (our priest doesn’t think references to the CCC are important in a curriculum, by the way). The real presence of the Eucharist is stressed, but it’s taught as something we do as a community and is a ‘meal’ (I’ve never heard it mentioned as a sacrifice or a re-presentation of Christ’s sacrifice), etc. It’s a liberal parish (for lack of a better word) in terms of what we are taught and hear about. I realize I have an uphill battle.

Any other ‘strategies’ you all can give me on presenting a case for more orthodox teachings to people who may not be receptive to orthodox teachings will be so greatly appreciate.
 
Myself and some seminarians reviewed “Blest are We” and I cannot recommend that series.
 
40.png
mosher:
Myself and some seminarians reviewed “Blest are We” and I cannot recommend that series.
Can you tell me why? I found out today our DRE really likes this one…
 
40.png
Elzee:
Can you tell me why? I found out today our DRE really likes this one…
It had primarily to do with arangment such as having a picture of a refuse dup next to a picture of our lady and its use of the Good News Bible for the sake of scripture. We also found some nuances that were not doctrinally sound but you have to remember that this was a couple years ago when we reviewed it and I don’t recall many of the particulars. However, we all decided that if we were to have a parish that we would not use it and we offered complaint to the DRE who was using it at the time.
 
40.png
Elzee:
Our parish and school will soon be looking into replacing its Religious Education curriculum for children - K through 8.
Faith and Life all the way!!!

We left a parish using the Keystone (Comic Book) series. Faith and Life is a breath of fresh air!
 
I inherited “Blest Are We” when I became DRE, and didn’t get it changed before I left the position (burnout happens at our church about every 2 years, as DRE was a volunteer position up until this year) and I did not find it all that effective. It worked very well for the grade that had two school teachers as catechists, and it worked okay for another catechist who was more than willing and able to supplement with other materials…however, the kids really didn’t learn much in the other classes, because the books are lacking in complete understanding of the Faith…
Spanish language resources for parents were a high priority for me, but the new DRE is thinking about going with the Sisters of Notre Dame one (Christ Our Life?) which I am sure is more orthodox, but I don’t know what her plans for the spanish speaking families are…

There are also lectionary based programs such as Pflaum gospel weeklies and Celebrating the Lectionary, which I found very useful in transitionary stages (they are inexpensive enough that you are not stuck with them for years like so many of the textbooks.) Celebrating the Lectionary is pretty liberal minded (I used to write for them, but I’m too conservative…) but if you ignore some of the liberal junk (i.e. they do not use the word Lord, or use he unless refering to Jesus, and try to make things gender neutral, etc.) it can be very good.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top