M
MariaTS
Guest
Darling, you haven’t supported your claims as of yet.
- Status
T
Tantum_ergo
Guest
You keep trying to change the subject and you’re also not necessarily correct in your own ‘gotchas’. But again, have a pleasant afternoon.
M
MariaTS
Guest
All I hear is that I am wrong, but you have never shown any evidence of that claim yet.
M
MariaTS
Guest
Oh don’t give me that nonsense. I am not trying to change the subject in any way.
‘you’re also not necessarily correct’ should be ‘you’re not necessarily correct’.
K
kimmielittle
Guest
kimmielittle;6895920:
Oh, but I haveYou seem to like to disregard them, however.
You said Catholicism taught your concept of goddess. I countered with Jesus’ own words.
You said that goddess was an early Catholicism teaching…I countered with Since Jesus is the Foundation of Catholicism and He referred to God as patriarch not matriarch as you seem to think. That it wasn’t early Catholic Teaching.
I and others here, have asked you repeatedly, to support your claims.
PS. I’m not YOUR Darling
M
MariaTS
Guest
If you believe that everything the Vatican says is correct, you are listening to propaganda from the religious right because Catholics are not required to believe everything the Vatican says. Also, most people who believe this are members of the religious right. Since I am telling the truth, I don’t think you can claim that I am employing the smear tactic.
K
kimmielittle
Guest
Actually, IMHO you have not produced any TRUTH…in all your posts. Sorry
PS I’ll admit I’m ignorant in many things…BUT I’m not so ignorant that I don’t know what the TS means
M
MariaTS
Guest
MariaTS;6895955:
Just because something in the Bible was presented as Jesus’ words does not mean it was Jesus’ words. Also, around the time of the early Church, the idea of God being female was prevalent among Catholics. A few hundred years later, many Catholics were forcibly converted from Paganism to Catholicism under threat of death, that doesn’t mean they stopped believing what they did. I’m sure they still had their own beliefs in secrecy. You do not know what Jesus’ really referred to God as because fallible man wrote down what Jesus’ said, you think they would have been able to copy his words directly hundreds of years after he died? They probably went on documents of Jesus’ existance and twisted them, ever so slightly, to push their own agenda. Also, historical documents show that many Catholics believed in a Goddess a very long time ago. I have supported claims.Oh, but I have
You said Catholicism taught your concept of goddess. I countered with Jesus’ own words.
You said that goddess was an early Catholicism teaching…I countered with Since Jesus is the Foundation of Catholicism and He referred to God as patriarch not matriarch as you seem to think. That it wasn’t early Catholic Teaching.
I and others here, have asked you repeatedly, to support your claims.
PS. I’m not YOUR Darling
P.S. Just because I called you darling does not mean I think of you as MY Darling.
M
MariaTS
Guest
I have stated the truth, the religious right does think that everything the Vatican says is the Truth. Also, what does me being TS have to do with this debate?Actually, IMHO you have not produced any TRUTH…in all your posts. Sorry
PS I’ll admit I’m ignorant in many things…BUT I’m not so ignorant that I don’t know what the TS means
K
kimmielittle
Guest
kimmielittle;6895986:
From where? Nice try again, But you see the very same ill use of logic that you use…“fallible man wrote down” also applies to any support you may try to present.
K
kimmielittle
Guest
It has the same weight that you try to give to my intelligence because of my sentence structure. NOTHING
Logic works both ways. It has to work both ways
M
MariaTS
Guest
Actually, transsexualism has nothing to do with intelligence. Poor grammar does have something to do with intelligence.It has the same weight that you try to give to my intelligence because of my sentence structure. NOTHING
M
MariaTS
Guest
There is a difference between evidence based on fact and evidence based on belief.From where? Nice try again, But you see the very same ill use of logic that you use…“fallible man wrote down” also applies to any support you may try to present.
K
kimmielittle
Guest
Well your good grammar wins :clapping: Maybe, you could learn the basics of logical debating
K
kimmielittle
Guest
M
MariaTS
Guest
Correction: ‘Maybe you could learn the basics of logical debate.’ You don’t so I wouldn’t be speaking if I were you.Well your good grammar wins :clapping: Maybe, you could learn the basics of logical debating
M
MariaTS
Guest
You have presented nothing but your subjective speculative beliefs. Also, I presented facts that can be easily backed up with historical fact.ABSOLUTELY.
IMHO you have produced nothing but your own subjective speculations
K
kimmielittle
Guest
Then logically, you should be able to easily prove my logic wrong. Please do so.
Remember, not subjective speculation, on your part, but logical empirical evidence to faulty my logic.
It should be easy for you to destroy a kids logic.
K
kimmielittle
Guest
M
MariaTS
Guest
It is illogical to believe everything that a book of beliefs says.Then logically, you should be able to easily prove my logic wrong. Please do so.
Remember, not subjective speculation, on your part, but logical empirical evidence to faulty my logic.
It should be easy for you to destroy a kids logic.
- Status