T
Tucker_R
Guest
Hmmm… this might help with the enviromental cults etc… but it’d be a slippery slope IMO.
Catholic means universal. Fundamentalists are minimalists (faith alone, bible alone). One can’t be Catholic and a fundamentalist (minimalist) at the same time. If someone accepts all of the teachings of the Catholic Church they are not fundamentalists. There are only two kinds of Catholics - orthodox or heterodox.Might I gently suggest people calm down a little here? To be fair the researcher isn’t talking about religious people in total, but rather the small subset of fundamentalists. Are the posters upset about this story Catholic fundamentalists?
My emphasis above.Fundamentalism and its often angry, vengeful God can do great harm to an individual and it would be great to fight it, but **I’m afraid something like this could be abused. Might not the Catholic Church then be labeled intolerant **religous fundamentalist for declaring itself to be “the sole Church of Christ”? Might we not see a crusade against thoughtcrimes that was a feature of Orwell’s 1984?
Do you mean that in treating people for their convictions many tomorrow will start to see Catholics the way they today see fundamentalists and set out to “cure them”? I guess I’m a little slow to catch your meaning.In your post above, replace the word “fundamentalist” with the word “Catholic.” Then perhaps you will what the real problem is…
To put this in perspective, such individuals have been trying to “cure” my Catholicism for years!Do you mean that in persecuting people for their convictions many tomorrow will start to see Catholics the way they today see fundamentalists and set out to “cure them”?
Yes! We have freedom of religion for a reason. We might not agree with certain groups, and we sure might think some are strange–yet, if we start thinking they are extremists, then who’s to stop people (tomorrow) from going after the next group, and then the next group, etc.?Do you mean that in treating people for their convictions many tomorrow will start to see Catholics the way they today see fundamentalists and set out to “cure them”? I guess I’m a little slow to catch your meaning.
However, an individual who had been a part of such a group might seek out treatment for anxiety issues or PTSD due to the way she was treated when she was part of the group, or when she seperated from the group. There could even be some Catholic people, who were abused by parents, teachers, or spouses and while their distress isn’t caused by the actual religion, there is a religious aspect to their affliction because their religion might have been misused to control or manipulate them. I think it would be beneficial for therapists to be aware of this sort of situation and how to help the patient recover. (Preferably without loss of their faith.) I suspect that may have been what was discussed at this event and the whole “fundamentalist religion is a mental illness” angle is more of a sensationalized headline, the type of which makes Huffington Post what it is.Yes! We have freedom of religion for a reason. We might not agree with certain groups, and we sure might think some are strange–yet, if we start thinking they are extremists, then who’s to stop people (tomorrow) from going after the next group, and then the next group, etc.?
If a person is part of a cult, perhaps that might take place–yet, the mainstream religions do not fall into that same category. Anything can be called “Religious Fundamentalism” if things are taken to an extreme. One day, just believing in God could have a person labeled in such ways.However, an individual who had been a part of such a group might seek out treatment for anxiety issues or PTSD due to the way she was treated when she was part of the group, or when she seperated from the group. There could even be some Catholic people, who were abused by parents, teachers, or spouses and while their distress isn’t caused by the actual religion, there is a religious aspect to their affliction because their religion might have been misused to control or manipulate them. I think it would be beneficial for therapists to be aware of this sort of situation and how to help the patient recover. (Preferably without loss of their faith.) I suspect that may have been what was discussed at this event and the whole “fundamentalist religion is a mental illness” angle is more of a sensationalized headline, the type of which makes Huffington Post what it is.
One psychiatrist I saw for a very short time saw it as a symptom when I told him that I was going on a silent retreat.To put this in perspective, such individuals have been trying to “cure” my Catholicism for years!
You mean those pesky, uncompromising trads who love and appreciate their faith and live their Catholic identity to it’s fullness?I have a feeling that some of the first victims of this new “disorder” are going to be traditional Catholics.
aaah…the deception of the world’s wisdom. Now Jesus could tell her a few things about pure free will…like how man might exercise it to the point where he loses eternal happiness.“Someone who has for example become radicalised to a cult ideology – we might stop seeing that as a personal choice that they have chosen as a result of pure free will.…
Yep. *Those *scallywags.You mean those pesky, uncompromising trads who love and appreciate their faith and live their Catholic identity to it’s fullness?
A symptom of what? (If it can be told.)One psychiatrist I saw for a very short time saw it as a symptom when I told him that I was going on a silent retreat.![]()
Bipolar disorder. Apparently, silent spirituality is an indicator of a depressive phase.A symptom of what? (If it can be told.)
I have two siblings with bipolar disorder and I WISH they would go in for some silent spirituality.Bipolar disorder. Apparently, silent spirituality is an indicator of a depressive phase.![]()
The author appears to be talking about cult ideologies and susceptibility to indoctrination as a mental illness that prevents people from choosing to join a cult of their own free will. She is not referring to religious fundamentalists in general.We’re all brainwashed, don’t you know. Get the strait jackets ready!
huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/31/kathleen-taylor-religious-fundamentalism-mental-illness_n_3365896.html
*An Oxford University researcher and author specializing in neuroscience has suggested that one day religious fundamentalism may be treated as a curable mental illness.
Kathleen Taylor, who describes herself as a “science writer affiliated to the Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics,” made the suggestion during a presentation on brain research at the Hay Literary Festival in Wales on Wednesday.
In response to a question about the future of neuroscience, Taylor said that “One of the surprises may be to see people with certain beliefs as people who can be treated,” The Times of London notes.
“Someone who has for example become radicalised to a cult ideology – we might stop seeing that as a personal choice that they have chosen as a result of pure free will and may start treating it as some kind of mental disturbance," Taylor said. “In many ways it could be a very positive thing because there are no doubt beliefs in our society that do a heck of a lot of damage."*
Not true.The author appears to be talking about cult ideologies and **susceptibility to indoctrination **as a mental illness that **prevents people from choosing to join a cult of their own free will. **She is not referring to religious fundamentalists in general.