S
SteveVH
Guest
From what you have posted you seem to agree with my assessment; it seems to be your view as well, does it not?That’s certainly your view Steve…I have no problem with that.
From what you have posted you seem to agree with my assessment; it seems to be your view as well, does it not?That’s certainly your view Steve…I have no problem with that.
Indeed. If all ways towards God are equal, then Bahaullah’s really not that important at all. I could proclaim that video games are my way towards God, that I find a spiritual truth and completeness in playing Skyrim for 5 hours, and suddenly Bahaullah’s just a footnote in a long line of ultimately unimportant people.Then it appears that there is no reason, at all, to accept Bahaullah as a manifestation of God.
![]()
Every Manifestation of God has the right to either retain or change what had been revealed previously. So, yes, the next has every right to change what Baha’u’llah commanded if God so wills.Indeed. If all ways towards God are equal, then Bahaullah’s really not that important at all. I could proclaim that video games are my way towards God, that I find a spiritual truth and completeness in playing Skyrim for 5 hours, and suddenly Bahaullah’s just a footnote in a long line of ultimately unimportant people.
How easy and fun this “make our own Christ!” thing is, and I have the Bahai to thank for it! I can’t wait to see who else comes along in 150 years and renders everything the Bahai have taught to be suddenly incomplete and lacking.![]()
This is a great example of moral and theological relativism. There is no such thing as objective truth, it can change in an instant according to the whims of the next manifestation.Every Manifestation of God has the right to either retain or change what had been revealed previously. So, yes, the next has every right to change what Baha’u’llah commanded if God so wills.
Baha’u’llah said the next Manifestation would not appear for at least 1,000 literal years…so, it could also be longer than that.
What changes is the way the eternal truths, as directed by God, find their expressions in society. Those change as society, collectively, matures and can handle more. The eternal truths, like The Golden Rule, are found in all the major religions and will never change.the bahai religion appears quite whimsical. when seeking truth, it must be very easy to find if it can change from one person to the next.
Except when doormouse says Jesus comes through the Eucharist, as a Catholic he or she means it literally which bahai totally must reject. Does Jesus even work for Christians in the grand scheme of things? It seems as if the church has fallen to the gates of hades.That’s wonderful doormouse
If Jesus can work through us in any way that works for us then that is praiseworthy.![]()
Priceless. So this means that the Bahai are nothing but another social club, when down comes to dirty.Every Manifestation of God has the right to either retain or change what had been revealed previously. So, yes, the next has every right to change what Baha’u’llah commanded if God so wills.
Baha’u’llah said the next Manifestation would not appear for at least 1,000 literal years…so, it could also be longer than that.
Why must it be literal? Why can’t it be an actual metaphore? You do the same with the gospels, whatever you dissagree with becomes a metaphore or symbol.Every Manifestation of God has the right to either retain or change what had been revealed previously. So, yes, the next has every right to change what Baha’u’llah commanded if God so wills.
Baha’u’llah said the next Manifestation would not appear for at least 1,000 literal years…so, it could also be longer than that.
Simple. It is literal because Baha’u’llah made the point of saying it was to be taken literally so that there would be no later dispute as to exactly what He meant by the 1,000 years.Why must it be literal? Why can’t it be an actual metaphore? You do the same with the gospels, whatever you dissagree with becomes a metaphore or symbol.
That means what exactly? Luke made a point of telling us that Jesus was not casper the friendly Ghost when he appeared to his apostles, yet the bahai still say that Jesus still didn’t really raise from the dead, didn’t really ressurect. Why should your texts be excluded from this treatment?Simple. It is literal because Baha’u’llah made the point of saying it was to be taken literally so that there would be no later dispute as to exactly what He meant by the 1,000 years.
No we would not accept that, so I will let you again correct me if I am wrong!We are talking about union with the Divine.
A spiritual union, while wonderful, cannot replace the most sublime intimacy there is this side of heaven: the One Flesh Union.
Thus, for you to say “We don’t need to have this intimacy with God that you Catholics have, because we have a spiritual connection with God” is analogous to your wife telling you, “I don’t need to enjoy the marital embrace with you anymore because we are already so close spiritually.”
You wouldn’t accept that, would you?
Eddie - No one discards the Notion of Justice, in fact it is very important - Baha’u’llah has writteni guess if you discard the notion of justice the concept of atonement is unnecessary.
Great.No we would not accept that, so I will let you again correct me if I am wrong!![]()
Well, if it’s not superior, then I would go looking elsewhere.Have you noticed that a lot of effort is put into trying to show how a Catholic Christian Love of God is far Superior to any other Religions Love of God. Superior as only a Catholic Christian knows the true connection of Christ and God!
How does one tell if it’s a True Religion or a False Religion?Love in the end has to be shown by Works. If one looks at all True Religion you will see that the same Love is in all and all that follow them are motivated to do Good Works via that Love of God.
You have not established anything has been corrupted. When was Christianity corrupted? How was it corrupted? How do you reconcile that with the claim of the quran that there weould be a group of true believers of Jesus to the day of ressurection?The fact that in the end man corrupts the meanings and adds exclusivity to it is why Gods needs to send another Messenger.
Regards Tony
That is a choice one could make, reminded me of some Poems that I wrote quite some time ago!Then it appears that there is no reason, at all, to accept Bahaullah as a manifestation of God.![]()
From the perspective of a plant which says: “I have received sunlight 3 days ago. I have no need of further sunlight.” and then says to other plants, “What is the proof of the sun which you claim to be gathering sunlight from?”Well, personally, I haven’t made any accusations against Bahaullah. I am just asking for some sort of demonstration for his divinity.
Is it your belief that I could achieve eternal salvation (or whatever is the equivalent of this as Bahais understand it) without Bahaullah?