G
GerardPaul
Guest
Why don’t Protestants and othe non-catholic christian groups take John 6 out of the Bible they already don’t believe in the plain truth of Christs words.
Could you please be more specific? Which verse or verses are you referring to?Why don’t Protestants and othe non-catholic christian groups take John 6 out of the Bible they already don’t believe in the plain truth of Christs words.
How about the ones in your signature? I get a chuckle every time I see that because you must be the only person who doesn’t understand the fallacy of your logic.Could you please be more specific? Which verse or verses are you referring to?
First you must understand Jesus’ ministry was for the Jews only. The Jews only needed to believe that Jesus was their Messiah, the Son of God. Just as Peter did in Mat 16:16 And Simon Peter answered and said, Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God.How about the ones in your signature? I get a chuckle every time I see that because you must be the only person who doesn’t understand the fallacy of your logic.
What I see is that you have mixed an obvious metaphor (John 4) with a literal passage (John 6:35+) to arrive at a false conclusion.
You’re obviously pretty proud of this, so I’d like to see it explained in greater depth from the Greek so that we can see it proven definitively?
Maybe you can begin by explaining how Jesus subsisted exclusively on doing the will of the Father instead of on ordinary food (or meat).
Just as Luther wanted to take out Revelations, James, Jude, and some other New Testament books, but changed his mind because there was no precedent to do so? But some denominations or groups seem to have, at least in theory, taken out some New Testament books already, deeming them not applicable to Christians today.Why don’t Protestants and othe non-catholic christian groups take John 6 out of the Bible they already don’t believe in the plain truth of Christs words.
Simon was the first to believe and confess He was the Christ. The others followed.Believer, you forget that if Jesus’ point is belief in Him; that is, if it’s only a symbol or some synonym for belief, then He would’ve clarified it with the Twelve.
The other disciples walked away because they did not believe but the 12 stayed.You stopped at verse 40, and didn’t go on to when the Jews were scandalized at His words. But not only the Jews; those with Him were also scandalized: “This saying is hard; who can accept it?” (verse 60). Note that at that point, they have already believed in Him; there’s simply no reason why they would find this hard to accept. Yet, what did He reply? “Does this shock you? What if you were to see the Son of Man ascending to where he was before?” This is a strange response from Jesus if He’s merely talking about faith in Him. Stranger still was after 60 left Him, He turned to the Twelve and asked: “Do you also want to leave?” (verse 70). Like I said, at that point He could have told His Disciples what He meant–whenever He spoke in parables, He always make it a point to explain to His closest associates the meaning of them. But there was no explanation coming; He was willing to let them go for this. As Scott Hahn observed, Jesus is the truth, and He would have been morally obliged to explain His point to clarify things, as He is the truth. But He didn’t.
Yes, but that doesn’t mean those with Him don’t believe in Him, does it now?Simon was the first to believe and confess He was the Christ. The others followed.
That is not the point, nor could you say they did not believe, because they were already believers, or else it would be sheer folly to follow someone they did not believe in. The point clearly shown is that such a saying is hard for all His Disciples, including the Twelve. To further it, and not clarify it, Jesus is willing to let even them go. Peter’s words are rather telling:The other disciples walked away because they did not believe but the 12 stayed.
What was Peter’s point here? He is, in effect, saying that he doesn’t understand what Jesus actually said, but there is no one else to go to anyway. It is notable here that Jesus still has not clarified His point–again, if this is merely a figurative narrative about believing in Him, He would clarify it with them. But He never did, and Peter and the others were left wondering what He said, at least until the time they were at the Upper Room and there showed them what He meant.Then Simon Peter answered him, Lord, to whom shall we go?** thou hast the words of eternal life.**
What are you talking about? Simon and the rest of the 12 believed. There’s no one left. Who are you referring to when you say “those with Him don’t believe in Him”Yes, but that doesn’t mean those with Him don’t believe in Him, does it now?
You’re going to have to start quoting scripture to support your claims.That is not the point, nor could you say they did not believe, because they were already believers, or else it would be sheer folly to follow someone they did not believe in. The point clearly shown is that such a saying is hard for all His Disciples, including the Twelve. To further it, and not clarify it, Jesus is willing to let even them go. Peter’s words are rather telling:
I believe that your point is that the Twelve believed; the others did not before this, which is simply not true.What are you talking about? Simon and the rest of the 12 believed. There’s no one left. Who are you referring to when you say “those with Him don’t believe in Him”
I already did, and explained them; you would have to come up with something better then.You’re going to have to start quoting scripture to support your claims.
Indeed, but the point of Jesus’ body and blood isn’t merely about belief, but He was referring to something physical.Peter and the others BELIEVED that Jesus had the “words of eternal life.” They believed and were sure Jesus was the Son of God.
Yes, we’ve already discussed that–is there any other insight you can add to this?The other disciples walked away because they did not believe but the 12 stayed.
Well… it’s getting late. I’ll just leave you with this.Indeed, but the point of Jesus’ body and blood isn’t merely about belief, but He was referring to something physical.
Surprisingly, you didn’t bold the last bit of the verse. Jesus gave his literal flesh for the life of the world, right? And therefore the “bread that [Jesus] will give” must be the literal flesh of Jesus. Unless you do not believe that Jesus gave his literal flesh for the life of the world…?Jhn 6:51 I am the living bread which came down from heaven: if any man eat of this bread, he shall live for ever: and the bread that I will give is my flesh, which I will give for the life of the world.
Interesting that you should quote that, because this more than actually defends the Catholic position. But let us first see what Jesus means by this: Jesus here is merely saying that all that He said is true; note that this comes after verses 61-62, wherein He says if what He said is shocking. What is shocking? That Hos body and blood means faith or belief? For the Jews and His Disciples, that is not shocking, since allegories and such parallelisms are known to His listeners. But note that they were scandalized by the realism of what He said–that He is real food, and His blood is real drink. But we go a bit deeper, and like I said this actually reinforces Catholic belief when He said it is the Spirit that gives life. Why so? During Consecration, the host and wine become His body and blood. Is it the priest who does this? No–this is not magic. But what–or who–gives life? It is the Spirit. We go over to the Last Supper once again and see there where is that body and blood–He makes it known there, in the bread and wine. Paul would in fact say later that as long as we eat this bread, which is His body, and the wine which is His blood, we proclaim the death of Jesus for our salvation. Nowhere in both cases did Paul or Jesus equate it to merely mean believing Him.Well… it’s getting late. I’ll just leave you with this.
Jhn 6:63
It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, [they] are spirit, and [they] are life.
Hey! Don’t you dare. John 6 is a wonderful description of the sacrament.Remove John 6