Removing original sin

  • Thread starter Thread starter nickrod
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
N

nickrod

Guest
I understand that when you are baptised your are also being cleansed of original sin…It was pointed out to me during a discussion with an Evangelist about infant baptism that Christ already died for original sin so there is no need for baptism when your an infant but until your an adult…I disagreed but was unsure. Can anyone clarify this for me ?
 
40.png
nickrod:
I understand that when you are baptised your are also being cleansed of original sin…It was pointed out to me during a discussion with an Evangelist about infant baptism that Christ already died for original sin so there is no need for baptism when your an infant but until your an adult…I disagreed but was unsure. Can anyone clarify this for me ?
What evangelicals don’t realize is that, while Christ died for all the sins of the world including original sin, one must be baptized into Christ to make that atonement effective in our lives.

Jesus’ sacrifice on the cross did not automatically wipe out original sin any more than it automatically wiped out my personal sins. I still need to repent to rid myself of personal guilt for sin. And every person needs to be baptised to be rid of original sin.

Otherwise, what would we make of the scripture that says
John 12:32
And I, if I be lifted up from the earth, will draw all [men] unto me.
If repentance and baptism was unnecessary to forgive sin, how would Christ being lifted up on the cross draw all men to him?

Paul
 
40.png
nickrod:
I understand that when you are baptised your are also being cleansed of original sin…It was pointed out to me during a discussion with an Evangelist about infant baptism that Christ already died for original sin so there is no need for baptism when your an infant but until your an adult…I disagreed but was unsure. Can anyone clarify this for me ?
It is not “also being clensed”. That is the main effect of Baptism to remove Original Sin from the soul. All are conceived and born with Original Sin (except Mary). The Grace obtained by Christ from the Cross is applied to the soul at the moment of Baptism and not before. Otherwise Salvation would be automatic for everyone. Some Protestants do hold to the idea of “UniversalSalvation”
 
I thought anyone born after the enlightenment was without original sin?
 
Here’s my understanding. I’d appreciate comment from those who actually know what they’re talking about; this has been running around in my head for a while and I could use some help.

Original sin is the state of existence in which we are deprived of the original union with God that Adam had. When Adam sinned, he broke that union and so was unable to pass it on to us. This hasn’t changed.

Passover remembered the redemption of Israel from slavery to Egypt, and was symbolic of the coming Messiah who would redeem the world from slavery to sin. The sacrifice of the paschal lamb did not make redemption real: it was a symbol. As the true Paschal Lamb, Christ’s sacrifice makes the redemption real: the price has been paid to buy us out of slavery to sin, and we are actually brought into a family relationship with God. The Jews believe that at the Passover celebration they are mystically present at the first Passover in Egypt, and the Church teaches that at the celebration of the Eucharist we are mystically present at Calvary. Christ’s sacrifice is a more perfect fulfillment.

In the same way, the ritual baths of the OT were symbolic of the cleansing from sin. Baptism in the Mikveh did not actually wash away sin, but the baptism of Jesus does. I believe this is what Jesus meant when he said “If you knew to whom you were speaking, you would ask and He would give you living water”. The phrase “living water” was a term of art that referred to the waters of the mikveh, which were to be provided to the bath directly from the source, without being handled, and thus directly from God. When Jesus claimed to be able to provide “living water”, He was making a claim to deity.

Regarding the Cross, I find verses like Romans 6:6 (crucified with him…that we might no longer be in slavery to sin), which seems to refer to our being freed from slavery to sin.

Regarding Baptism, I find ones like John 3:5, Acts 2:38, Acts 22:16, 1 Corinthians 6:11, 1 Corinthians 12:13, 1 Peter 3:21, Ephesians 5:25-27, Colossians 2:12-13, and Titus 3:5, which seem to emphasize our being buried with Christ and brought back to life as part of His body, with our sins washed away.

As Passover and the mikveh symbolized the distinct graces of redemption and cleansing, so the Eucharist and Baptism actually bring them into effect. The two sacraments do different, but related, things.

There is a real benefit to infant baptism. Read the Catechism, paragraphs 1250-1252 and 1262-1274. As circumcision created a physical sign that one was part of God’s covenant, so Baptism creates a spiritual sign of belonging to Christ. It cleanses the child from the stain of original sin, thus bringing him into a special and intimate relationship with God that he otherwise would not have. It enables him to believe in God, hope for Him and to love Him; provides the power to live and act under the prompting of the Holy Spirit; and allows them to grow in goodness. It makes him a member of the Body of Christ.

Gee, the more I think about this the more exited I get!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top