M
mikeeh
Guest
Just out of curiosity. Can a married Catholic couple renew their marriage vows anywhere and can anyone “officiate”? Obviously there would be no blessing.
My understanding is that marriage vows can not be renewed because they don’t expire. The vows that bind the couple are just as strong fifty years after the wedding as they are the day of.Does the Church not permit the renewal of marriage vows in that no rite is provided
In charity, I think perhaps it’s worth considering that the renewal of vows is unnecessary.Like the renewal of vows is no big deal; like saying 'ok, the church will give it a blessing or two but it’s not really necessary.
Papal blessings are beautiful and requesting one is certainly an appropriate way to mark an anniversary. I see a difference between “renewing” one’s wedding vows, which by nature are permanent, and celebrating important milestones with a Mass or blessing or party.The Pope even sends out an official certificate commemerating a married couple on their milestone Wedding Anniversary. My mom and dad recieved a Papal Certificate commemerating my parents - stated each of their names - and sent them his Papal blessing in celebration of their 25th Anniversary and on their 50th Anniversary. Receiving that Papal certificate was a huge deal to my parents and our whole family and is with me even to this day.
From 2001:Just out of curiosity. Can a married Catholic couple renew their marriage vows anywhere and can anyone “officiate”? Obviously there would be no blessing.
Neither do our Baptismal vows “expire,” yet every Easter Vigil we are invited to renew them. And the Rite of Baptism includes the invitation to the assembled congregation “renew now the vows of your own Baptism.” So?My understanding is that marriage vows can not be renewed because they don’t expire. The vows that bind the couple are just as strong fifty years after the wedding as they are the day of.
But I do like the idea of the couple receiving a blessing on special anniversaries.
From a ZENIT article by Father Edward McNamara, LC:Let’s not argue over this. It was what I thought a simple question. Let me ask it another way for clarity. Can a couple “renew” their marriage vows in a symbolic ceremony outside of a church and without an ordain officiant? I ask because I read an article about a couple who got married at Disneyland and while it was sweet I couldn’t imagine myself receiving the Sacrament of Matrimony anywhere but in a church. With that said I think it would be fun to “renew” vows at different locales for anniversary trips. For instance, being in Vegas one year and having an Elvis impersonator “officiate” the anniversary. Or having an anniversary/superhero costume party. Or “renewing” your vows on top of the Eiffel Tower. Is any of this frowned upon? I assume, as (name removed by moderator) mentioned there is no rite for renewing vows, it wouldn’t be a problem.
This is correct, of course, although it is not, strictly speaking, a renewal of vows but rather a blessing — and in my original answer I desired to stick to this precise theme.
A married couple certainly “could” do that sort of thing if they choose. By that I mean there’s no canonical penalty for renewing marriage vows in front of an Elvis impersonator.Let’s not argue over this. It was what I thought a simple question. Let me ask it another way for clarity. Can a couple “renew” their marriage vows in a symbolic ceremony outside of a church and without an ordain officiant? I ask because I read an article about a couple who got married at Disneyland and while it was sweet I couldn’t imagine myself receiving the Sacrament of Matrimony anywhere but in a church. With that said I think it would be fun to “renew” vows at different locales for anniversary trips. For instance, being in Vegas one year and having an Elvis impersonator “officiate” the anniversary. Or having an anniversary/superhero costume party. Or “renewing” your vows on top of the Eiffel Tower. Is any of this frowned upon? I assume, as (name removed by moderator) mentioned there is no rite for renewing vows, it wouldn’t be a problem.
OK then.From a ZENIT article by Father Edward McNamara, LC:
Ordo Celebrandi Matrimonium, editio typica altera (1991), does include in Appendix III: ‘Ordo benedictionis coniugum intra Missam, occasione data anniversarii Matrimonii adhibendus.’ This appendix recommends that on the main anniversaries of marriage, e.g., 25th, 50th, or 60th, a special remembrance of the sacrament may be held within Mass. This includes inviting the couple to renew before God their commitment to live a holy married life. The ‘renewal’ then includes the exchange of a formula between the couple: ‘Blessed are you, Lord, for by your goodness I took N. as my wife/husband.’ And then both together pray a prayer of renewal. A blessing of the rings may also follow. And following the Our Father, there is a special blessing which the priest bestows. Thus, it would seem that the universal Church has indeed proposed such a renewal of commitment to married life, though the terms ‘renewal of vows’ — as you pointed out — is avoided."
ewtn.com/library/Liturgy/zlitur440.htmCode:This is correct, of course, although it is not, strictly speaking, a renewal of vows but rather a blessing — and in my original answer I desired to stick to this precise theme.
That’s exactly why priests use (or should use) the ritual books approved by the Church.I’ve seen a whole range of things being done, from a simple blessing to “repeat your vows now.”
Whatever the “renewal of vows” is or looks like, it has to be essentially different from a repeated celebration of marriage, since that is forbidden (cf. c. 1127.3)…right? And, the more closely the couple comes to actually repeating the vows, the less difference there is.
Dan
Indeed. Something I just noticed, though: the 1983 Code of Canon Law has broadened the prohibition to forbidding “another religious celebration…for the purpose of giving or renewing matrimonial consent” (c. 1127.3) while the 1917 Code only prohibited approaching a non-Catholic minister for a second ceremony (c. 1063).That’s exactly why priests use (or should use) the ritual books approved by the Church.
I know that when I use the Roman Ritual (or other legitimately approved form) and I do & say exactly what it describes, there is no problem (quite the contrary).
One cannot take the quote out of context.Indeed. Something I just noticed, though: the 1983 Code of Canon Law has broadened the prohibition to forbidding “another religious celebration…for the purpose of giving or renewing matrimonial consent” (c. 1127.3) while the 1917 Code only prohibited approaching a non-Catholic minister for a second ceremony (c. 1063).
Dan
My best friend’s sister had an affair. She confessed it to her husband (they are both Catholic), they went to counseling, and then they renewed their wedding vows. I don’t know the specifics of the situation here, but I have seen firsthand that in the case of infidelity it can be very healing for the couple to renew their vows.why would one need to renew these vows?