I think many people on this forum agree that our culture is heading toward a catastrophic collapse. Many point to individual moral issue that they say are the cause. I think we need to step back and look at the underlying principles of our culture and where we are failing it, not it failing us.
I see people of a variety of viewpoints, whether they are radical left wing Communists/Marxists or strong supporters of traditional Christianity all pushing their ideas of “if only everyone did not do this or that action…” the world would be perfect.
I think everyone is so focused on small specifics of actions that they no longer see the bigger picture of why our culture and nations were much stronger 110 years ago than they are today.
My question is: What was it about our Western nations of 100+ years ago that made them better morally, spiritually, and culturally than they are today? How should we live today so as to restore our Western nations to their previous states of integrity rather than the present state of decline?
It’s simple. 100 + years ago, God was more a part of our lives. 50 years ago, being a community of different faiths with shared values meant we all respected some type of ethical and moral principles. Today, we have ‘radical individualism.’ The “I’ll do what I want and no one - no one - can tell me different.”
Pope Benedict:
"The Holy Father says:
Code:
"If we cannot have common values, common truths, sufficient communication on the essentials of human life–how to live how to respond to the great challenges of human life–then true society becomes impossible."
Commentary by the Practical Catholic:
"How true this is. Where there is no communication, no culture, no shared experience, there is no society; because there is no people. There remains only a vast and foreboding, unforgiving sea of individuals ready to crash upon each other and the world with the slightest wind. Without a common basis, we have not the vaulted pluralism we’re taught to embrace, but Babel, in all the confusion and madness of a society with no binding forces. Already we are seeing the tensions of this fragmentation breaking out across cultures.
“Without common values and truths, such as in the societes we find ourselves in, we find the fabric of society torn like Joseph’s cloak, by a great many tribes which would like to lay claim to the title of favored. Leftists, conservatives, anarchists, nihilists, secularists, objectivists, the shallow, the entertainers, the entertained, all vying for control against each other. Tribalism can indeed spawn differentiation, but without some common ground, and in the face of increasing jargon not only in the academies but in the cultures; we shall be left with madness. In the end this tribalism can only result in the decline of all their claims, and the alienation of one from the other. Babel is the happenstance when society tries to become God.”
Commentary from me. If it’s all about “what I want and who cares about what other people want then truth, right and wrong, is ONLY for me to decide.” No - truth is truth.
"Pope Benedict XVI goes on to say:
Code:
"We are moving toward a dictatorship of relativism which does not recognize anything as for certain and which has as its highest goal one’s own ego and one’s own desires. The church must defend itself against threats such as “radical individualism” and “vague religious mysticism”. [emphasis added]
Commentary by the Practical Catholic:
“Pope Benedict does not play language games, he is unconcerned with the postmodernist’s corner on untruth. Neither should we be. Notice how he calls relativism a “dictatorship” instead of agreeing that no values and no Truth are the way forward for society. What many fail to recognize is that imposing nihilism and arbitrary tribalism is a form of dictatorship. Where untruth or half truth is the common order, there can only be oppression. Political correctness has asked us to abandon our value-laden language and to pick up a new language proper to the secular forum. However, this secular newspeak is value-laden against the traditional claims of the Western world and as such, is a poison rather than a new order. We can and should bring our own conviction laden language to the table, if we’re going to have any sort of real dialogue at all. Misinformation and restrained convictions are not the proper building blocks for a democracy.”
Peace,
Ed