S
SpiritFire
Guest
Hi.
My family and I were conversing, and the subject of gluten-intolerance came up. We also touched on the aspect that the person would not be able to receive Communion in most cases.
One of my family members piped in that they would have to use rice hosts or something besides wheat.
Doesn’t this constitute invalid matter?
Or is there an exception (like if the person could die if he/she ingested gluten or something)?
When I suggested invalid matter,
Someone in my family said that because the Vicar of Christ (the parish priest. Should they be referred to as such?) decided for pastoral reasons he could confect the sacrament with hosts made from other things besides wheat, that’s okay.
Because lex orandi, lex credendi, how the church worships (prays) She believes.
Which to the person in question apparently means a priest can do whatever he wants and will still be with the Church.
(i.e., the priest decides how the Church will pray, and thus in doing so decides what She believes)
Thus, if the Church decided (or more precisely, parish priest or bishop decided) to use rice hosts, that would be okay.
This doesn’t seem like the right approach to the phrase Lex Orandi Lex Credendi.
I thought the Pope was the Vicar of Christ, and although the priest acted in persona Christi he does not have authority in certain liturgical or pastoral decisions.
(like not saying the Mass as promulgated in the Roman Missal in all respects)
Like I said, is there any exception? What should I tell them?
Help please!!
My family and I were conversing, and the subject of gluten-intolerance came up. We also touched on the aspect that the person would not be able to receive Communion in most cases.
One of my family members piped in that they would have to use rice hosts or something besides wheat.
Doesn’t this constitute invalid matter?
Or is there an exception (like if the person could die if he/she ingested gluten or something)?
When I suggested invalid matter,
Someone in my family said that because the Vicar of Christ (the parish priest. Should they be referred to as such?) decided for pastoral reasons he could confect the sacrament with hosts made from other things besides wheat, that’s okay.
Because lex orandi, lex credendi, how the church worships (prays) She believes.
Which to the person in question apparently means a priest can do whatever he wants and will still be with the Church.
(i.e., the priest decides how the Church will pray, and thus in doing so decides what She believes)
Thus, if the Church decided (or more precisely, parish priest or bishop decided) to use rice hosts, that would be okay.
This doesn’t seem like the right approach to the phrase Lex Orandi Lex Credendi.
I thought the Pope was the Vicar of Christ, and although the priest acted in persona Christi he does not have authority in certain liturgical or pastoral decisions.
(like not saying the Mass as promulgated in the Roman Missal in all respects)
Like I said, is there any exception? What should I tell them?
Help please!!