Rituals of the Mass

  • Thread starter Thread starter eafan
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
E

eafan

Guest
I really don’t know how to explain my question in a concise manner, so I haven’t found the answer doing a search here, but am hoping for some info.

In the Catholic parish I grew up in, our priest was extremely reverent at all times during the mass. Not that other parish priests I saw were not, however he had a deep reverence the entire time which was really obvious.

After I grew up, moved away, etc. I didn’t notice much difference, other than the larger city churches I now attended had more modern buildings. However, when I went back for a mass with him a few years later, the differences how he did things was obvious. I’m not talking about TLM here, but the normal Vatican 2 version.

For instance, right before he’d leave the sacristy, he’d always lightly ring the bell there. I have never seen any other priest do this, but he did it every mass.

He would reverently walk to the altar, genuflect, go around to the back of it, kiss it, and go stand off to the side behind it. He’d usually sing from the hymnal and when he was done, would-and for the whole mass if he wasn’t doing something else-have his hands folded together with palms touching and fingers pointing straight up. When he’d read the prayers, he’d extend his hands apart from each other, and at the end of the prayer, return them to folded position.

His “routine/ritual” was always the same. Every time. From the time I was in first grade when he came to our parish until the last time I was at one of his masses when I was in my mid-30s.

During the offertory, he would do everything meticulously and exact. Unlike other priests, he would never skip any detail, including raising the paten and chalice at specific times, saying the same specific prayers verbatim, washing his hands, etc.

He even would have the altar boy (of which I was one for several years in grade school) ring a bell at the elevation of the consecrated host and wine. He would always genuflect very reverently and seemed to say a prayer quietly while doing so during then as well.

He also had the bell rung just before distributing communion when he’d brush the… wafer catcher (sorry, don’t remember what they called these)-do they even use these at all anymore? I haven’t seen one used in years. He’d even break the main host in a certain way-basically breaking it in exact half, then a small portion he’d break off and place in the chalice. Plus, he’d always hold it in the same way-together, never one half of it.

After communion, he’d again have a very specific routine where he’d rinse the chalices, drink from them, and throughout wipe them with the white cloth (don’t recall what that’s called off hand) and reassembled everything again.

Very, very reverent, and very meticulous during EVERY mass.

I have never seen another priest do every step he did. They have ranged from “pretty close” to “hardly resembling” what he did. And the variance in reverence, I don’t think I need to bring that up!😉
**
So, my question is, did what my long time childhood priest do his own method, or was that the way priests were/are SUPPOSED to do things? When I was trained as an altar boy, we were told specifically all the steps to the mass and it seemed to me this was more the official way of doing things. Or, was it a times thing? **

(This was during the early - mid 1970s when I was an altar boy and very rarely was at other masses. On the weekends, however, we did have a different priest come from the nearby monastery for a couple of the masses, and I don’t really remember if he was so specific, but it seems he was at least close to my original priest.)

Sorry for the long post/question, but I don’t know how else to ask it but to explain it!

Thank you very much for your thoughts,

E.A. Fan
👍
 
Your priest was a holy man…I too grew up with priests like this…not a lot of them like this today.

I have seen some rush through a lot of the parts of the mass, it is sad.

We had a young priest at our parish a couple of years ago that came right from ordination…he was like this, meticulous care in cleansing the chalices, always holy and reverant, wonderful homilist as well.

Our regular priests are good men, and are holy I believe, but I do believe there is a generation there that have missed out on it.
It pervades the church in many ways.

The good news is that the young priests that are being ordained today seem to be loyal to our Holy Father and very traditional in their preaching and mannerisms.
 
No! It was not his own method. Every little motion and gesture you describe is in the rubrics or an official book of the Mass. I too had a priest like this at our parish, for 15 years, retired age 83. Meticulous, but in the old fashioned way of calm attention to the meaning of what he is doing, not like some of the younger FSSP or SPPX priests now who have all the gestures but look to be putting on a show. Only some, the newer ones.

He rang the bell as you say, exactly once. The hand gestures are very important, most priests do them wrong today, or sloppy. If you get an Adoremus Hymnal it describes thru the Mass each gesture the priest is making. These all have meaning, are defined and are supposed to be followed by every priest. But most fling their arms open wide or something exaggerated. The purifying after, and how to fold the cloth and all the placements of the vessels is precise.

Since he had been doing this for decades, it all came very naturally, yet still looked neat and exact, but never stiff or pretentious. This is why rubrics are important. Priests need to stop making up their own gimmicks and follow the book exactly, and somehow it enhances the whole mass.
 
The mass was very peaceful and done to precision. From the altar server to the priest:)
 
Your priest was a holy man…

Our regular priests are good men, and are holy I believe, but I do believe there is a generation there that have missed out on it.
It pervades the church in many ways.

The good news is that the young priests that are being ordained today seem to be loyal to our Holy Father and very traditional in their preaching and mannerisms.
Yes, very much so was my priest in my youth holy. He was truly Christ-like.

I think you’re right that there is at least 1, maybe more, generations that missed out. I’m happy to see Pope Benedict leaning more traditionally.

Thanks for your response.
 
No! It was not his own method. Every little motion and gesture you describe is in the rubrics or an official book of the Mass. I too had a priest like this at our parish, for 15 years, retired age 83. Meticulous, but in the old fashioned way of calm attention to the meaning of what he is doing, not like some of the younger FSSP or SPPX priests now who have all the gestures but look to be putting on a show. Only some, the newer ones.

He rang the bell as you say, exactly once. The hand gestures are very important, most priests do them wrong today, or sloppy. If you get an Adoremus Hymnal it describes thru the Mass each gesture the priest is making. These all have meaning, are defined and are supposed to be followed by every priest. But most fling their arms open wide or something exaggerated. The purifying after, and how to fold the cloth and all the placements of the vessels is precise.

Since he had been doing this for decades, it all came very naturally, yet still looked neat and exact, but never stiff or pretentious. This is why rubrics are important. Priests need to stop making up their own gimmicks and follow the book exactly, and somehow it enhances the whole mass.
That’s what I thought might be the case. Thank you for the info. I’m currently looking for an Adoremus Hymnal. I’d love to know what all the little gestures, etc. mean.

Thanks for your post.
 
That’s pretty much how it’s done in our parish except for the bell before mass and the one before communion. We also have the bell at the epiclesis.

Our servers, MC’s, acolytes, seminarian, and deacon also fold their hands referently (I don’t know why the Lectors don’t) Some of the EMHC’s do too.

They also bow their head at the name of Jesus during some of the prayers of the mass.
 
He was doing what he is supposed to do (although the bells are optional in the GIRM). Other priests may not be a precise in movements (we don’t all have the same physical grace), but they will do the same actions, for example kiss the altar, add the tiny corner of the host to the wine, purify the vessels after communion. I cannot quote sections of the instructions for you (I’m sure others will be happy to provide the references), but you should see this at every Mass. Don’t be concerned about physical grace, and don’t get too hung up or being “liturgy police”, but the actions and order of events should be the same.
 
I suspect your parish priest was ordained before Vat. II, was he? Gestures then were much more regimented than they are now (i.e. hands spread only ‘this much’ at a particular time) and that would have an impact on how he celebrated the OF. The priests we’ve had in our parish in the last 7 years never genuflected upon entering the sanctuary, in spite of the fact that the tabernacle is present there. They also never genuflected after the elevations or before Communion.

Their predecessor was in his 70s and while he couldn’t genuflect upon coming into the sanctuary (he probably wouldn’t have gotten up again) he held on to the altar and genuflected at the appropriate times during the Mass. He was also much more careful in his gestures than his successors.

The bell before Mass is not something which is prescribed in the OF so that was his own thing. I don’t know if it’s something that is necessary in the EF or the form of the Mass that came before '62.
 
He was doing what he is supposed to do (although the bells are optional in the GIRM). Other priests may not be a precise in movements (we don’t all have the same physical grace), but they will do the same actions, for example kiss the altar, add the tiny corner of the host to the wine, purify the vessels after communion. I cannot quote sections of the instructions for you (I’m sure others will be happy to provide the references), but you should see this at every Mass. Don’t be concerned about physical grace, and don’t get too hung up or being “liturgy police”, but the actions and order of events should be the same.
No worries, I’m not trying to be the “police”! The priest I mentioned has been dead about 15 years now. I’ve just always wondered what the reasons/meanings of all the little gestures he constantly did were.

What is GIRM?

I’m not offended by other priests not doing them, either. More traditional seems more reverent, but in a sense, the more casual styles seem to make the priests more approachable too. I can see it both ways.

I recently found this most interesting video many of you might be interested in seeing:

youtube.com/watch?v=s4wh8Kb97N4

Thanks for all the responses!

EA Fan
 
I suspect your parish priest was ordained before Vat. II, was he? Gestures then were much more regimented than they are now (i.e. hands spread only ‘this much’ at a particular time) and that would have an impact on how he celebrated the OF. The priests we’ve had in our parish in the last 7 years never genuflected upon entering the sanctuary, in spite of the fact that the tabernacle is present there. They also never genuflected after the elevations or before Communion.

Their predecessor was in his 70s and while he couldn’t genuflect upon coming into the sanctuary (he probably wouldn’t have gotten up again) he held on to the altar and genuflected at the appropriate times during the Mass. He was also much more careful in his gestures than his successors.

The bell before Mass is not something which is prescribed in the OF so that was his own thing. I don’t know if it’s something that is necessary in the EF or the form of the Mass that came before '62.
Thank you for this info. Yes, he was ordained pre Vt2, I think in the 1940s (he’s been dead around 15 yrs.).

Forgive the maybe obvious questions, but I’m a Catholic “return”-
what is “OF” and “EF”?

Thanks again,

EA fan

Just posting this link again as it’s very interesting to this thread, I think:
youtube.com/watch?v=s4wh8Kb97N4
 
Just a note. Our priest (who is doing all the same things) was ordained 4 years ago.
 
Thank you for this info. Yes, he was ordained pre Vt2, I think in the 1940s (he’s been dead around 15 yrs.).

Forgive the maybe obvious questions, but I’m a Catholic “return”-
what is “OF” and “EF”?

Thanks again,

EA fan

Just posting this link again as it’s very interesting to this thread, I think:
youtube.com/watch?v=s4wh8Kb97N4
There is only ONE Mass but in the Latin Rite there are two ways of celebrating it: the Ordinary Form (OF), which is what you will normally find at daily Mass and Sunday Mass in most parishes, and the Extraordinary Form (EF), which some people call the Traditional Latin Mass or the Tridentine Rite or again the 1962 rite.

The EF that your former pastor learned to celebrate when he was in the seminary had very specific gestures. I recall one priest telling us about being in the seminary and walking around with a string looped around his hands to learn exactly how far he could spread them apart for a particular moment in Mass. That kind of training doesn’t disappear just because 25 or so years later you suddenly start celebrating a simplified Mass in another language.

The GIRM (General Instruction of the Roman Missal) is the document that says how the Mass is to be celebrated. If you look at the link you’ll see a document that pretty much sets down step-by-step how things are to be done. I have to admit I’d been an extraordinary minister of Holy Communion and a reader for 2 decades before I found out that such a document existed.
 
Just a note. Our priest (who is doing all the same things) was ordained 4 years ago.
Interesting. Seems there might be some variance of opinions here. Going to try and find the resources mentioned, or, does anybody know where this can be found?

thanks!
 
I think I just answered my own question!

old.usccb.org/romanmissal/order-of-mass.pdf

I see just about everything he did here, but no bells. What’s with the bells? Did they go away at some point?
No, you find the bells in the GIRM
150. A little before the Consecration, if appropriate, a minister rings a small bell as a signal to the faithful. The minister also rings the small bell at each elevation by the Priest, according to local custom.
 
No, you find the bells in the GIRM
150. A little before the Consecration, if appropriate, a minister rings a small bell as a signal to the faithful. The minister also rings the small bell at each elevation by the Priest, according to local custom.
Thank you, Phemie for all this helpful info, espeically the link!

I appreciate the insights here.

EA Fan
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top