If you compare Sungenis to other apologists… his critiques of others are found only on his site… while others who critique him will often post their comments anywhere they can … like hit and run trolls, I guess.
His works in the theology/apologetics arena are always so well referenced, and supported with documentation, and proofs, not opinion. So it is strange when another criticizes him for what he writes when it comes from the Fathers, Scripture, and so many other stated sources.
As for his views on science… he states that they are his views, and it is my understanding he is well versed and well educated in physics (except to those who disagree). His more “controversial” views are often just as acceptable as contrary views (like the earth being the center of the universe - laws of physics would indicate it could be true) . At any rate, it makes for zealous posting by the “experts”.
I have never heard any orthodox Catholic, or reputable apologists say or write anything critical about Sungenis’ books on Catholic though. That alone says a lot
Pick up his first volume of the Catholic Apologetics Study Bible.
It is on Matthew… them decide if he is credible. Personally, I think it is masterful, and I look forward to the other 12 volumes over the next ??? years.
