Thank you. Our priest has decided to have a lay minster do this, reading already prepared texts. While I do not fully agree with the concept, our diocesan liturgical office gave a “yes” to it, so theres no arguing with our pastor…at least were not having women come forward for the feet washing…
By posting about the priest’s comments I was not trying to convey disapproval of lay people being commentators. It is a ministry specifically mentioned in the 1963 Constitution on the Liturgy Sacrosanctum Concilium:
“29. Servers, readers, commentators, and members of the choir also exercise a genuine liturgical function. They ought to discharge their office therefore with the sincere devotion and decorum demanded by so exalted a ministry and rightly expected of them by God’s people.”
The Introduction to the Lectionary:
“57. The commentator also fulfills a genuine liturgial ministry, which consists in presenting to the assembly of the faithful, from a suitable place, relevant explanations and comments that are clear, of marked simplicity, meticulously prepared, as a rule written out, and approved beforehand by the celebrant.”
In the 2007 Sacramentum Caritatis, Pope Benedict seemed to go out of his way to encourage comments before the readings:
“45. … When circumstances so suggest, a few brief words of introduction could be offered in order to focus the attention of the faithful.”
The letter of Cardinal Arinze to the Neo-catechumens (1 December 2005) is also a recent endorsement of the commentator:
“2. With regard to any admonitions given before the readings, these must be brief. The dispositions of the Institutio Generalis Missalis Romani (nn. 105 and 128) and the Praenotanda of the Ordo Lectionum Missae (nn. 15, 19, 38, 42) must also be followed.”
From these references a lay commentator may say things before each reading and before the responsorial psalm:
“15. There may be concise introductions before the readings, especailly the first. …”
“19. … A brief remark may be helpful about the choice of the psalm and response as well as their correspondence to the readings.”