Foreknowledge does not negate free will.
Yeah, it does. Absolute foreknowledge does exactly that. Knowing what one WILL do absolutely precludes the possibility of changing minds or directions.
What you’re talking about is called pragmatism and we don’t base our evangelism on pragmatism, but on what the word of God says. If the word of God says that we’re to warn people about Hell and call them to repent, then it really doesn’t matter whether or not you think it “does us good”. God tells us to go, we go, He takes care of the rest.
…and of course you have no choice in how you preach the word of God, because, well…it’s not your job to actually bring people to the light, is it? It is simply your job to tell them they are going to hell?
Here’s the thing; there is NOTHING wrong with pragmatism, especially when dealing with something as vital as the eternal souls of those to whom you preach…and especially when being pragmatic is also being more truthful than preaching hellfire and brimstone.
It seems to me that people who are so concerned with pointing out the pitfalls that they forget to light the path–and ensure more falls than successful crossings.
First of all, you’re misquoting me. I never said anything about the frequency of which He spoke of Hell in relation to other topics. I simply said that Jesus (and, by extension, the rest of the Bible) spoke of it frequently.
Second, like I pointed out to you, frequency has nothing to do with it. We do not get our doctrine from how many times something is said, but what is said.
Actually, that’s a bit of a back pedal, I believe. You wrote the following: “First of all, Christ spoke about Hell quite frequently and very graphically. He made it very clear to sinners that if they did not repent, then their fate would be an eternity in a literal Hell.”
Therefore frequency–or the number of times He said something–means a great deal to you. As it happens, He used the word fifteen or so times, generally in describing what happens to people who are rude, (saying ‘thou fool’ will put you there) uncharitable. MOST of His instructions were shedding light on the path, not pointing out the pitfalls, though.
Go into a black neighborhood and throw the “N-word” around a couple of times and then explain to them, “Oh, but I didn’t mean you”. Let me know how that works out for you.
Well now. That’s a bit of an overreaction. True, “fundie” is rude, and indicates a fundamental disagreement on approach and/or doctrine, as well as a decision made against that approach and doctrine, but hey…
I despise political correctness, too. But that doesn’t give me an excuse to be rude to you.
You are quite correct. How are you in that area?
Actually, it isn’t a good alternative for a couple of reasons.
The first and most obvious is because that isn’t how God told us to do it.
The second is that my “living via example” will not make someone understand the Gospel.
If that is how we’re supposed to practice evangelism, then why don’t we see that in the Bible?
We do. “Come, follow me.” The Life most perfectly lived, Who may have said that he who is not with us is against us, but Who also said 'he who is not against us is with us."
Who said to the adulteress he had saved from stoning “neither do I condemn thee, go and sin no more.” Who healed the sick, caused the blind to see and raised the dead. Who said “suffer the little children to come unto me, for such is the kingdom of heaven.” Whose most famous sermon mentions hell…but mentions it for those who call each other 'fool." Whose clear and concise instructions were to “Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works, and glorify your Father which is in heaven.” and “be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect.”
“Judge not, lest ye be judged.”
“therefore by their fruits you shall know them.”
That entire sermon is about…being a good example.