Sacramental Grace and the (7) Sacraments

  • Thread starter Thread starter lssanjose
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
L

lssanjose

Guest
So I had a chat with a very “orthodox” EC priest. Though we didn’t get into details he did say there are differences between the Sacramental life of the East vs. the West.
I think Father Loya talks about “at least” seven sacraments. He talked about having a sacramental world view. This kind of view encompasses not just items of the immediate church items. But, he mentioned being “green” is very sacramental. As I read more of Bread & Water, Wine & Oil, the more I can see there’s a difference of emphasis.
Note from Moderator:
This discussion on the sacramental theology was sufficiently off-topic to create a new thread from it. It also, sadly, did not maintain our expectations for charitable discussion in places, but I expect that will be amended as the conversation continues.
Please see here for the original discussion asking if one may receive Communion in the Eastern Catholic Churches with a serious sin on the soul.

May God Bless You Abundantly,
Catherine Grant
Eastern Catholicism Moderator
 
Dear brother Issanjose,
I think Father Loya talks about “at least” seven sacraments. He talked about having a sacramental world view. This kind of view encompasses not just items of the immediate church items. But, he mentioned being “green” is very sacramental. As I read more of Bread & Water, Wine & Oil, the more I can see there’s a difference of emphasis.
I’ve always wondered about this. I know that Latins have what are known as “sacramentals,” which also impart Grace. The Oriental Tradition also generally speak of only seven Sacraments.

What exactly is the Eastern understanding of these other Sacraments? Is it actually the same as the Latin understanding of sacramentals?

Blessings,
Marduk
 
Dear brother Issanjose,

I’ve always wondered about this. I know that Latins have what are known as “sacramentals,” which also impart Grace. The Oriental Tradition also generally speak of only seven Sacraments.

What exactly is the Eastern understanding of these other Sacraments? Is it actually the same as the Latin understanding of sacramentals?

Blessings,
Marduk
What sacraments?

My understanding is that sacraments are divinely instituted (by Christ himself) and if done properly (proper form et al) will always impart grace- of themselves, as instituted by Christ. But sacramentals are ecclesiastically instituted and depend on the strength of faith of the person using them to be able to impart the grace. Such that wearing a scapular without a real reliance and trust in Our Lady means…not much, but baptism, unless the person specifically rejects it in his heart, will impart that grace if done properly, even if the person’s faith is not active unless that person rejects it and so impedes its reception in his heart. Which is how we can baptize babies or be baptized by atheists. Is this the meaning you intend when you compare those extra eastern sacraments with catholic sacramentals like holy water and scapular?
 
Dear brother Issanjose,

I’ve always wondered about this. I know that Latins have what are known as “sacramentals,” which also impart Grace. The Oriental Tradition also generally speak of only seven Sacraments.

What exactly is the Eastern understanding of these other Sacraments? Is it actually the same as the Latin understanding of sacramentals?

Blessings,
Marduk
Well, from what I gathered from Father Loya, he talks about taking a sacramental view of the world. He had a 50 minute interview with a TV anchor; and explained how the green movement fits into the Eastern Christian paradigm; and how it’s reflected in the church, for whom, he’s pastor. Maybe brother ByzCathCantor can shed better light, but I take it there are seven chief sacraments, but they see every part of creation as a sacrament.
 
Dear brother Issanjose,

I’ve always wondered about this. I know that Latins have what are known as “sacramentals,” which also impart Grace. The Oriental Tradition also generally speak of only seven Sacraments.

What exactly is the Eastern understanding of these other Sacraments? Is it actually the same as the Latin understanding of sacramentals?

Blessings,
Marduk
I think that the Eastern/Oriental Churches prefer to talk about Holy Mysteries and those do not have a one to one correspondence with the seven Sacraments as defined by the Council of Trent. I think that the Holy Mysteries encompass more, including your example of the sacramentals.
 
I think that the Eastern/Oriental Churches prefer to talk about Holy Mysteries and those do not have a one to one correspondence with the seven Sacraments as defined by the Council of Trent. I think that the Holy Mysteries encompass more, including your example of the sacramentals.
According to Marduk, this is more an Eastern phenomenon. The orientals have only seven sacraments, just like the West.
 
… I’ve seen lists from Orthodox sources - not Catholic at all - that distinguish the Great Mysteries from the other Holy Mysteries, and the same seven we speak of as Sacraments do indeed alone comprise the former.
If I may ask of my Latin Catholic brothers and sisters here, as this subject has bounced around in a couple of threads of late, how would you characterize a special blessing - perhaps using the often mentioned blessing in lieu of Communion? How about anointing with the manna of the Saints? etc.

Are these considered “sacraments”?
 
If I may ask of my Latin Catholic brothers and sisters here, as this subject has bounced around in a couple of threads of late, how would you characterize a special blessing - perhaps using the often mentioned blessing in lieu of Communion? How about anointing with the manna of the Saints? etc.

Are these considered “sacraments”?
The communion line is for communion. If we are not disposed, we should be making a spiritual communion.
 
The communion line is for communion. If we are not disposed, we should be making a spiritual communion.
I agree, but sometimes it feels as if we’re in the minority.

That said, perhaps a bad example. My bad!

What about blessing with holy water? anointing with oil of the saints (e.g. St. Nicholas Manna)?
 
I think that the Eastern/Oriental Churches prefer to talk about Holy Mysteries and those do not have a one to one correspondence with the seven Sacraments as defined by the Council of Trent. I think that the Holy Mysteries encompass more, including your example of the sacramentals.
I would say that you can tell which are considered Holy Mysteries (what the Latin Church calls Sacraments) and which are what the West calls “sacramentals” in part by whether someone who is not Orthodox may receive or not. This of course also depends on the individual priest, of the individual Orthodox Church, but that said, I have many times in Orthodox Churches received anointing with oil at the Litya service of a festal vigil but the priest would not anoint me, not Orthodox, in a Holy Unction service, and I have many times received Antidoron, but never Holy Eucharist.

I have seen plenty of writings by well respected Orthodox teachers which do designate clearly at least the same seven Holy Mysteries which the the Latin Church calls seven Sacraments.
 
I agree, but sometimes it feels as if we’re in the minority.

That said, perhaps a bad example. My bad!

What about blessing with holy water? anointing with oil of the saints (e.g. St. Nicholas Manna)?
I don’t know why I did not think to answer you before- These are what I said to Marduk (post #3 above)- sacramentals, not sacraments.
What sacraments?

My understanding is that sacraments are divinely instituted (by Christ himself) and if done properly (proper form et al) will always impart grace- of themselves, as instituted by Christ. But sacramentals are ecclesiastically instituted and depend on the strength of faith of the person using them to be able to impart the grace. Such that wearing a scapular without a real reliance and trust in Our Lady means…not much, but baptism, unless the person specifically rejects it in his heart, will impart that grace if done properly, even if the person’s faith is not active unless that person rejects it and so impedes its reception in his heart. Which is how we can baptize babies or be baptized by atheists. Is this the meaning you intend when you compare those extra eastern sacraments with catholic sacramentals like holy water and scapular?
They are not divinely instituted, like the sacraments, but do confer grace by power of the church, though not in the same manner as the sacraments. Also, the sacraments, if done properly (proper form et al) will always release the grace. Sacramentals depend on the faith of the user in addition to the power of the Church before God (intercession) to release the grace.

See also this definition from fisheaters:

‘‘First a definition: a sacramental is a sacred sign that signifies effects obtained through the Church’s intercession. While all of the seven Sacraments are Christ-instituted and always do exactly what they signify ex opere operato (“from the deed done”), sacramentals are usually Church-instituted (though some are Christ-instituted). They work through the power and prayers of the Church (ex opere operantis Ecclesiae) and, subjectively, ex opere operantis, that is, through the pious disposition of the one using them. Sacramentals drive away evil spirit, and when piously used, remit venial sin and prepare the soul for grace.’’
fisheaters.com/sacramentalsintro.html
 
What sacraments?

My understanding is that sacraments are divinely instituted (by Christ himself) and if done properly (proper form et al) will always impart grace- of themselves, as instituted by Christ. But sacramentals are ecclesiastically instituted and depend on the strength of faith of the person using them to be able to impart the grace. Such that wearing a scapular without a real reliance and trust in Our Lady means…not much, but baptism, unless the person specifically rejects it in his heart, will impart that grace if done properly, even if the person’s faith is not active unless that person rejects it and so impedes its reception in his heart. Which is how we can baptize babies or be baptized by atheists. Is this the meaning you intend when you compare those extra eastern sacraments with catholic sacramentals like holy water and scapular?
From a certain Eastern point of view there is really one Sacrament. Jesus Christ. How else did God impart His grace onto the world if not the incarnated Christ?

The Orthodox also see Monastic Tonsure and the Funeral Rite as Sacraments, although some would say “lesser Mysteries” in keeping with the seven “major” or “greater” Mysteries. There is a tenth one which currently slips my mind.
 
I think Father Loya talks about “at least” seven sacraments. He talked about having a sacramental world view. This kind of view encompasses not just items of the immediate church items. But, he mentioned being “green” is very sacramental. As I read more of Bread & Water, Wine & Oil, the more I can see there’s a difference of emphasis.
A sacramental worldview, at least in the sense that it seems to be implied here (and, in my discussions with Eastern Orthodox), is that in a sense life in Christ is a sacrament. That the whole range of participating in the Way- the Church, Mysteries, prayer, devotions, asceticism, etc.- conveys grace. Because God the Father is renewing us in His Son Jesus, in the power of the Holy Spirit. And when one is fully immersed in such a life, than all of existence becomes a means to glorify God, and this is only possible because God first gives the Grace to make it happen.

This is not to say that everything “conveys” grace equally (as though we can truly measure the “distribution” of such a thing as grace). The Eastern Orthodox tradition identifies seven [Greater] Mysteries, which match the list the Catholic Church and Oriental Orthodox have. This is because these things have, over time, become identified as being instituted by God. That being said, this does mean that other things do not convey Grace. The Holy Spirit is like and the wind, and blows where He wills…
 
A sacramental worldview, at least in the sense that it seems to be implied here (and, in my discussions with Eastern Orthodox), is that in a sense life in Christ is a sacrament. That the whole range of participating in the Way- the Church, Mysteries, prayer, devotions, asceticism, etc.- conveys grace. Because God the Father is renewing us in His Son Jesus, in the power of the Holy Spirit. And when one is fully immersed in such a life, than all of existence becomes a means to glorify God, and this is only possible because God first gives the Grace to make it happen.

This is not to say that everything “conveys” grace equally (as though we can truly measure the “distribution” of such a thing as grace). The Eastern Orthodox tradition identifies seven [Greater] Mysteries, which match the list the Catholic Church and Oriental Orthodox have. This is because these things have, over time, become identified as being instituted by God. That being said, this does mean that other things do not convey Grace. The Holy Spirit is like and the wind, and blows where He wills…
Are you sure you’re not Eastern Catholic? I can use someone like you 😉
 
From a certain Eastern point of view there is really one Sacrament. Jesus Christ. How else did God impart His grace onto the world if not the incarnated Christ?

The Orthodox also see Monastic Tonsure and the Funeral Rite as Sacraments, although some would say “lesser Mysteries” in keeping with the seven “major” or “greater” Mysteries. There is a tenth one which currently slips my mind.
From a certain perspective, the Latin Church would also agree with this. The Incarnation is the “marriage” of Divinity and Humanity…it is from Christ, the image of the invisible God, that grace enters the world. All seven of the traditional sacraments draw from the one source of the passion, cross, and resurrection of Our Lord. When Our Lord’s heart was pierced, Scripture tells us that water and blood gushed forth - the Latin Church often identifies the water as baptism and the blood as the eucharist. The Church itself, as the mystical extension of the Incarnation - the body of Christ on earth, is itself identified as the sacrament on earth, with the individual sacraments flowing from this one great sacrament of the Church herself:
Catechism of the Catholic Church - 775 "The Church, in Christ, is like a sacrament - a sign and instrument, that is, of communion with God and of unity among all men."197 The Church’s first purpose is to be the sacrament of the inner union of men with God. Because men’s communion with one another is rooted in that union with God, the Church is also the sacrament of the unity of the human race. In her, this unity is already begun, since she gathers men “from every nation, from all tribes and peoples and tongues”;198 at the same time, the Church is the “sign and instrument” of the full realization of the unity yet to come.
776 As sacrament, the Church is Christ’s instrument. “She is taken up by him also as the instrument for the salvation of all,” “the universal sacrament of salvation,” by which Christ is "at once manifesting and actualizing the mystery of God’s love for men."199 The Church “is the visible plan of God’s love for humanity,” because God desires "that the whole human race may become one People of God, form one Body of Christ, and be built up into one temple of the Holy Spirit."200
 
the Syriac term raza/rozo has a far wider meaning than ‘Sacrament’ in the scholastic sense, and that in the Syriac Churches there has never been any tradition of distinguishing between different categories of raze/roze; rather, they are to be understood as representing a continuum, running from the most important to those of less importance

pro-oriente.at/dokumente/5SyrCons2002.doc

I think the teachings of Mar Ephrem as well as other Syriac writers show this is not an Eastern (Byzantine/Greek) phenomenon.
 
From a certain perspective, the Latin Church would also agree with this. The Incarnation is the “marriage” of Divinity and Humanity…it is from Christ, the image of the invisible God, that grace enters the world. All seven of the traditional sacraments draw from the one source of the passion, cross, and resurrection of Our Lord. When Our Lord’s heart was pierced, Scripture tells us that water and blood gushed forth - the Latin Church often identifies the water as baptism and the blood as the eucharist. The Church itself, as the mystical extension of the Incarnation - the body of Christ on earth, is itself identified as the sacrament on earth, with the individual sacraments flowing from this one great sacrament of the Church herself:
It should be pointed out that it isn’t necessarily limited to humanity. In Christ was the recapitulation of all of creation. He was a microcosm. In him all of creation is redeemed and it all becomes sacrament. So you have icons which represent the images of Christ or of the saints. They also bear the Grace of God. The Syriac tradition speaks of all of creation as sacrament. The whole of creation bears the image of God and is a medium for Grace. Everything becomes a medium through which Grace is conveyed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top