Sacred letter of jesus christ

  • Thread starter Thread starter jrgiancola
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sounds suspicious,
“Those people who…cast slurs on this Sacred letter shall be forsaken by Me.” Those words wouldn`t come from our Lord.
Supposing that He did dictate such a letter, it would be only private Revelation, and apart from the receiver(s), nobody is bound to believe it. The same applies to any of the Church approved phenomena; eg Fatima. Public Revelation ceased when Saint John died.

Other passages sound strange…
 
I as well would not take the so called letters at face value and interm to grant something in following the directions for the so called prevy to another level of awareness of lhe who we follow.
 
SunnaB16 said:
Sounds suspicious,
"Those people who…cast slurs on this Sacred letter shall be forsaken by Me." Those words wouldn`t come from our Lord.
Supposing that He did dictate such a letter, it would be only private Revelation, and apart from the receiver(s), nobody is bound to believe it. The same applies to any of the Church approved phenomena; eg Fatima. Public Revelation ceased when Saint John died.

Other passages sound strange…
Click to expand...
You are right. Christ would never say these words. He loves us unconditionally and would never forsake us. These sound like the lies and deceit of satan trying to confuse.

I also believe that Christ did NOT write or dictate such a letter.
 
What makes people make up this kind of junk and other people believe it? How very sad.
 
I’ve never been able to make sense of the preface. St. Elizabeth and St. Bridget weren’t alive a the same time (if I have the right saints) – what does it mean that Christ appeared to them and spoke thus?

Also, I don’t understand the references to “this letter” or in the text itself. If the text is a transcription of what Christ spoke to them, why would it refer to “this letter”?

And why would Christ refer to what St. Gregory said about the letter? And, surely St. Gregory lived long before either St. Elizabeth or St. Bridget. Did St. Gregory appear after his death?

It seems very confusing.

VC
 
With the greatest of respect for our dear Lord and Savior, and absolutely not to question Him or deny or doubt Him in any way at all. . .when I looked at the latter portion (and to do it justice, the site did say that they were not 100% certain of the papal ‘sanction’ of the later part). . .well, that later part read like a chain letter. “Do this and good things will happen. Joan did not break the chain and won $5000 in a lottery. Ann DID break the chain and her daughter is in prison and Ann gained 40 pounds and her husband is talking about divorce. Do not break the chain. . .”
 
The latter part is not a part of the original letter. It just talks about the miracles that have happened to those who followed the instructions. The letter is very old; I know my grandparents from Italy had copies too from the early 20th century. It’s not a recent thing. Anyway, I believe it.
 
Fatima was a public revelation, so was Lourdes. St. Faustina’s revelations were made for the public. I believe in these also.
 
jrgiancola said:
Fatima was a public revelation, so was Lourdes. St. Faustina’s revelations were made for the public. I believe in these also.
Click to expand...
Fatima and Lourdes were PRIVATE revelations and have been deemed worthy of belief by the Church.
Your so-called letter of Christ has not.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top