Hello Catholic Fireman:
I am taking a break from learning how to “bend” the second hole draw on my harmonica to respond to your video:
The video was well done. I cracked a smile at the “not appropriate for mass” dance at 5:40 minutes (humor is useful). I do think I have seen nearly all those quotes come up in the context of the “guitar wars” threads elsewhere on the forum. I agree with you traditionalist folk that this music is certainly beautiful and I would not complain at all if it were performed at my parish - even if it was exclusively performed.
My question is: who is the audience for this video? If you want to restore chant, don’t you need to convince music directors, priests, bishops, etc.? I wasn’t around in the 60’s or 70’s or whenever the music changed, but was that change top-down or bottom-up? I don’t see this as a grass roots thing. I know the video says that there are wonderful resources to learn chant, and I plan on checking those out, but I know too that music (any music) is not easy to do really well. Some people have talent and others just need to listen. Some of the “folksy” tunes we have as mass at my parish include attempts to get the congregation to clap in time with the music - the results are awful, people can’t do it, they take several measures of out-of-time slapping to get close to the beat. It’s like Squidward’s marching band on SpongeBob. I don’t see them leading a music revolution of any kind.
The other problem I think you face is that some people really like what the video described as “syrupy or sappy” songs. It’s not that they don’t know about how great chant is (they probably vaguely heard of it) - but they think the syrupy stuff sounds better! To them it is moving and uplifting and sets the right tone at mass. How do you tell someone that what they find moving is not moving?
I wish you all well with the chant restoration. I hope you succeed. If the revolution makes it to my parish I will be (silently) stamping and cheering for you.
Cheers,
JHow