Saddam's $2m offer to WMD inspector

  • Thread starter Thread starter gilliam
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
G

gilliam

Guest
Saddam’s $2m offer to WMD inspector By Francis Harris in Washington (Filed: 12/03/2005) Saddam Hussein’s regime offered a $2 million (£1.4 million) bribe to the United Nations’ chief weapons inspector to doctor his reports on the search for weapons of mass destruction

Rolf Ekeus, the Swede who led the UN’s efforts to track down the weapons from 1991 to 1997, said that the offer came from Tariq Aziz, Saddam’s foreign minister and deputy.

Mr Ekeus told Reuters news agency that he had passed the information to the Volcker Commission. "I told the Volcker people that Tariq [Aziz] said a couple of million was there if we report right. My answer was, ‘That is not the way we do business in Sweden.’ "

A clean report from Mr Ekeus’s inspectors would have been vital in lifting sanctions against Saddam’s regime. But the inspectors never established what had happened to the regime’s illicit weapons and never gave Iraq a clean bill of health.

The news that Iraq attempted to bribe a top UN official is a key piece of evidence for investigators into the scandal surrounding the oil-for-food programme. It proves that Iraq was offering huge sums of cash to influential foreigners in return for political favours.

Nile Gardiner, of the Heritage Foundation in Washington, who has followed the inquiries, said: “It’s the tip of the iceberg of what the Iraqis were offering. For every official like Ekeus who turned down a bribe, there are many more who will have been tempted by it.”

Saddam and his henchmen siphoned off an estimated £885 million from the humanitarian scheme, allegedly paying some of that to 270 foreign politicians, officials and journalists.

Most of those alleged to have been involved in the scandal, including the former head of the programme, Benon Sevan, have denied that they did anything wrong.

A United States Senate report said that Mr Sevan had committed criminal acts by soliciting oil contracts, while the Volcker commission said that he had failed to explain $160,000 (£83,000) paid into personal bank accounts while he was the head of the programme.
 
Lantern jawed freedom loving all-American boys would never get involved in corruption of course.

copi.com/defrauding_america/chp_29.htm

DEFENSE AND AVIATION RELATED CORRUPTION
President Eisenhower warned about the military-industrial complex as he was leaving office, but to no avail. Pentagon fraud and bribery, CIA covert operations to protect the interests of powerful U.S. corporations overseas, and aviation-related crimes were some of the many scandals surfacing in the 1980s, creating a well-entrenched mindset that continues to this date. Establishment media coverup plays a key role in the American public’s ignorance about corruption in government. Refusal to read the many highly detailed expose books and articles is another reason why this corruption is able to escalate.

Evidence of aviation and space related frauds by major corporations repeatedly surfaced in the 1980s and the 1990s. An Aviation Week & Space Technology article (April 3, 1989) stated in part:
*The pattern of corruption that has emerged from the Ill Wind cases involves classic influence peddling. government employees received bribes in return for providing consultants with early notice of upcoming contracts and for helping them devise strategies for winning those contracts. The consultants convinced contractors to hire them based on their access to an inside source. A bribed government employee like Berlin could use his influence to determine which firms would be eligible for a contract and, in some cases, could help determine the winner by inserting specific criteria in a service’s acquisition plan, favoring one contractor over another. Berlin did this for Teledyne and Hazeltine. The corrupt official also could provide confidential bidding information so a favored contractor could submit a superior best and final offer to win an award . * Despite the consequences in money, safety and lives, bribing of government officials exists in the aviation field. Lockheed, Douglas, Northrop, and other aircraft manufacturers have repeatedly been charged with paying bribes to generate orders for their product, and to avoid complying with inspections and design safeguards.

Justice Department prosecutors filed a lawsuit on July 31, 1991, in New York charging General Electric with defrauding the Pentagon of more than $30 million on the sale of jet engines and support services to the Israeli Air Force. Implicated in this fraud was an Israeli Air Force general who pled guilty to fraud and bribery charges.

Lockheed admitted bribing foreign government officials as an inducement for them to buy military and commercial aircraft. In one instance, Lockheed officials resigned after Justice Department prosecutors charged Lockheed with bribing foreign officials.(505) These corporate officials admitted sanctioning bribes exceeding $22 million to European and Japanese officials. Lockheed pled guilty to secret payoffs(506) to Japanese government and business officials to promote the sale of Lockheed L-1011 aircraft.

Boeing Corporation paid bribes exceeding $3 million for promoting the sale of Boeing 747s to Middle East Airlines.(507) Northrop Corporation bribed Korean officials through a fictitious hotel project that served as a conduit for bribes.(508) American Airlines agreed to pay a civil penalty for making illegal political contributions.(509)

Bribes were paid to Japanese politicians and firms to obtain aircraft orders,(510) and government auditors could not account for $3.4 million paid by Boeing and McDonnell Douglas. Boeing agreed to plead guilty(5ll) to felony charges of illegally obtaining classified Pentagon documents from a lobbyist, Richard Fowler, who illegally obtained the documents from Pentagon insiders. Many believe Boeing got off with a slap on the wrist as many Boeing executives were directly involved with the unauthorized handling of military planning material.

Defense Department investigators reported they were looking at other major defense companies suspected of trafficking in secret government documents The Boeing investigation was pursued independent of the massive Pentagon bribery and influence-peddling probe code-named "Operation III Wind " Fowler was convicted by an Alexandria, Virginia, jury on December 7, 1989, on 39 felony counts related to unlawful acquisition and distribution…
 
The question is: why would Saddam pay two mill to get a clean bill of health for weapons he didn’t have?
 
gilliam said:
The question is: why would Saddam pay two mill to get a clean bill of health for weapons he didn’t have?

either he is just a compulsive spender… smileys.smileycentral.com/cat/36/36_15_30.gif

or

he is in the habit of paying at least 2 million for anything… smileys.smileycentral.com/cat/23/23_4_107.gif

or

he thought the inspector was his family doctor…smileys.smileycentral.com/cat/3/3_9_5v.gif %between%

or

Bush was right all along… smileys.smileycentral.com/cat/14/14_1_106.gif
 
gilliam said:
The question is: why would Saddam pay two mill to get a clean bill of health for weapons he didn’t have?

Saddam did have WMD after 1991 that is not in dispute. We know he had them then because the UN weapons inspectors destroyed them. Which is why he did not have them at the time of the invasion.

Why are you raising this Gilliam? Do you hope that people will fail to notice the dates and think the 1991 to 1997 period is the same as the one leading up to the invasion?
 
40.png
Matt25:
Saddam did have WMD after 1991 that is not in dispute. We know he had them then because the UN weapons inspectors destroyed them. Which is why he did not have them at the time of the invasion.

Why are you raising this Gilliam? Do you hope that people will fail to notice the dates and think the 1991 to 1997 period is the same as the one leading up to the invasion?
Saddam did have weapons that we discovered at this time (1991-1997). Part of the problem with this whole ordeal is that the inspectors admitted that they didn’t destroy them all before they were kicked out. But they were there, at this time.

However it begs the question: which other inspectors were bribed and did they take the bribes. We do know that some others within the UN took the bribes.

Christopher Hitchens in 2003:

“I know of at least one incontrovertible case where a senior inspector was offered a huge bribe by Tariq Aziz himself: The man in question refused the money, but obviously not everybody did.”
slate.msn.com/id/2078512
 
40.png
gilliam:
However it begs the question: which other inspectors were bribed and did they take the bribes. We do know that some others within the UN took the bribes.

Christopher Hitchens in 2003:

“I know of at least one incontrovertible case where a senior inspector was offered a huge bribe by Tariq Aziz himself: The man in question refused the money, but obviously not everybody did.”
slate.msn.com/id/2078512
It’s very clear the UN is incredibly corrupt, poorly run, and their ‘peacekeepers’ are obviously not concerned about their mission since they are busy rounding up local women for sexual pleasure.

We know there is corruption in the UN and that Saddam was corrupt. Ergo, the theory that UN officials (including weapons inspectors) were offered and some did accept bribes, is hardly a difficult scenario to imagine as being quite true.

Lisa N
 
from the original article:

The news that Iraq attempted to bribe a top UN official is a key piece of evidence for investigators into the scandal surrounding the oil-for-food programme. It proves that Iraq was offering huge sums of cash to influential foreigners in return for political favours.

Nile Gardiner, of the Heritage Foundation in Washington, who has followed the inquiries, said: “It’s the tip of the iceberg of what the Iraqis were offering. For every official like Ekeus who turned down a bribe, there are many more who will have been tempted by it.”

Saddam and his henchmen siphoned off an estimated £885 million from the humanitarian scheme, allegedly paying some of that to 270 foreign politicians, officials and journalists.

Most of those alleged to have been involved in the scandal, including the former head of the programme, Benon Sevan, have denied that they did anything wrong.

A United States Senate report said that Mr Sevan had committed criminal acts by soliciting oil contracts, while the Volcker commission said that he had failed to explain $160,000 (£83,000) paid into personal bank accounts while he was the head of the programme.

telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2005/03/12/wsaddam12.xml&sSheet=/news/2005/03/12/ixworld.html
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top