San Bernardino bishop reflects on Occupy Movement

  • Thread starter Thread starter prettiefly
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
P

prettiefly

Guest
San Bernardino bishop reflects on Occupy Movement

What are we to make of the Occupy Movement that has found its way from Wall Street to many communities here in our diocese? How does our Catholic faith inform our view of it?

Some of us may have already joined the protests or considered it. Others may wonder ‘what’s the point?’ or question the use of civil disobedience as a means of political expression.

Certainly this movement is a reflection of the dissatisfaction and despair felt by so many who face unemployment, foreclosure, poverty, hunger and other ill effects of the Great Recession that has gripped our country for the past three years. Our diocese has felt this pain significantly, reporting unemployment and poverty rates that are among the worst in the United States. It’s no surprise, then, that people in San Bernardino, Riverside, Redlands, Victorville and other cities are taking to the streets to vent their frustration.

One of the great gifts of our nation is our right to freedom of expression, to speak our mind publicly when we disagree with a prevailing policy or wish to bring light to something we believe unjust. Those participating in the Occupy Movement are exercising that right and should be free to do so. At the same time, any destruction of property, violence and other abuses that take place as part of these protests must be condemned. Even such a strong statement of disagreement must carry the flag of civility. We have the right to disagree with one another. We do not have the right to be disrespectful of anyone.

The Occupy Movement is challenging the fairness of our economic system, given that more and more people are being hurt by it than helped by it these days. Our faith is concerned with the economy in its impact on the human dignity that God grants each of us. We may think of the economy in terms of job reports, business transactions, stock markets and growth projections but Catholic teaching holds that the economy must be measured by how well it serves the people. Does it provide opportunities for meaningful work for the individual, a stability of food and shelter so that families can thrive, a distribution of resources that does not disproportionately favor one group over another and, in reflection of our Lord Jesus’ call in Matthew’s Gospel, does it provide for the poor and most vulnerable among us?

The rest of the article:
calcatholic.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?id=635f8ea6-66b9-45c6-9102-d3d5ff9c15cc
 
I love the comments on the article at the link. For those of us who aren’t from San Bernardino and familiar with Bishop Barnes, the comments give a critical perspective in the evaluation of His Excellency’s remarks.
 
Bishop Barnes wrote in part:

“we are called as Catholics to exercise Faithful Citizenship, raising our voices when we see moral failure in the public policies and government actions that shape our lives. We do this not to side with a particular political ideology or to follow a cultural trend. We do it for the same reason every time – to protect and promote human dignity. We believe that every life has value – regardless of economic status, race, age, health or any other factor. This is the love to which our Lord Jesus Christ calls us.”

I would think all of us here, agree with the Bishop’s clear statement. Faithful Citizenship - paying attention to politics, voicing our opinions, and voting according to our Catholic conscience is our duty to God.

Peaceful, non-destructive public protest is way to try to affect government and business decisions.

But so is acknowledging personal responsibility for our own economic well being.

There is no public policy that requires that 25% of student drop out from high school without getting a diploma. There is no public policy that requires 9% of Americans to be addicted to drugs. There is no public policy that requires a divorce rate of nearly 50%. Or unwed mothers with absent fathers. Real men protect and provide for their women and children.

Yes, there was a public policy to market “sub-prime” mortgages to nice people who simply could not afford the payments. And yes, the rich ‘Wall Streeters’ got richer off the fees they charged to make all those bogus loans. And yes, there was a bailout of the bankers but not the homeowners who naively took on mortgages they could not afford in a vain attempt to live like they wanted to while ignoring the reality of what they could afford.

Perhaps what we have is too many people who live their lives ignoring the Ten Commandments and, in that intentional ignorance, demand the government provide more support for them so they can continue to ignore the Commandments.

I am glad to support the truly poor through my federal and state taxes and charitable contributions, but I have difficulty in wanting to support the lazy and ill-disciplined. The problem is how do we separate the two groups - helping those who deserve it and requiring more from those who do not?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top