=TriuneUnity;6569499]I keep them, at least outwardly, most of the time. I may not have ever cheated on my wife. That doesn’t mean I haven’t committed adultery. “You therefore must be perfect, as your heavenly Father is perfect.”
We must be perfect to enter heaven. We neeed not be perfect in this life. What did Jesus tell the rich man? . IF you would to be perfect" give up everything that you have. If we are not perfect in this life we will be made perfect before we enter heaven. We are to pursue holiness in this life. If we do not attain perfect holiness in this life we will be made perfect in purgatory as scripture clearly says.
I wouldn’t disagree with that. I just wouldn’t call it justification
.You’re thinking of works “by themselves” apart from grace. We must be in the state of grace for our works to be a part of justification. It is faith and works.
They are not opposed for the purpose of the Christian life. They are opposed for justification. Otherwise, the ungodly could not be justified.
The ungodly cannot be justified without faith which must come first and works given to us by grace become necessary along with that faith. If works are opposed to justification then James misunderstood the Holy Spirit “we are justified by works, not by faith alone”
I find nothing of initial justification in Scripture. One is either declared innocent or declared guilty.
**“Baptism **now saves you.” 1 Peter 3:21 " You were
washed, you were **sanctified,
you were justified **" 1 Cor. 6:11
Paul is saying we are justified by faith apart from works of any kind.
Why did Paul say in Gal 5:6 “faith working through love?” Why doesnt Paul say faith without love? If justification requires that faith be apart from works
of any kind You need to explain why Paul says “For it is not the hears of the law who are righteous before God, but the **doers of the law **who will be justified”
Your insertion of “works of the law” only referring to the Mosaic covenant regulations is eisegesis. Paul gives the context to works of the law and it is not restricted to works of the Mosaic covenant
.
Paul is simply stating what Catholics are stating. Works alone cannot justify us. That is what the Jews believed.
Circumcision was an important part of the nation of Israel, but it was not part of the Mosaic covenant. It was part of the covenant made with Abraham. This fact alone means that Paul is talking about more than the Mosaic law. Again, Paul interprets himself by mentioning specific things, like coveting, that were part of the moral law of God and not limited to Mosaic rituals but to eternally relevant commandments
.
So your claim is that Paul was saying to Jewish Christians “we are justified by faith apart from keeping the commandments of God?” Can you enter enternal life without keeping the commandments?