Santa Claus is blasphemous

  • Thread starter Thread starter kbwall
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
This *must *be a joke. Santa? Blasphemous?! Really? No one can seriously believe that.
There are genuine battles worth joining for God and country, rather than taking on a popularized image of an actual saint, and mis-defining the term ‘blasphemy.’

😃
 
There are genuine battles worth joining for God and country, rather than taking on a popularized image of an actual saint, and mis-defining the term ‘blasphemy.’

😃
I’m “bitterly clinging” to my belief in Santa! 😃
 
I agree with the CCC’s definition of lying. However, here I think is the point of contention:

Most parents would never say they are intentionally deceiving their children. Yes, Santa Claus is not real. Neither is the Ugly Duckling, Snow White, Rumpelstiltskin, or (according to the notes in my New American Bible, so take it with a grain of salt) the Books of Tobit and Judith in the Bible.

BUT people tell their children these stories not because of the verity of the situation, but because of the underlying moral truth. Santa, for example, teaches us that generosity makes others feel good, and when we are generous, we feel pretty good, too. Also, we ought to behave, or else we will not be rewarded.

In the words of G.K. Chesterton, “Fairy Tales are more than true; not because they tell us that dragons exist, but because they tell us that dragons can be beaten.”

HOWEVER, given the special situation of Santa - in that he’s no longer just a mythical figure, but almost the central figure, tantamount to the Baby Jesus, of the non-Christian “Winter Holiday”, I can certainly understand your and others’ feelings. And Santa must be made the servant of the Baby Jesus. Something like this:

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-q4wsqzr6n...FNyrE/s400/Santa+kneeling+over+baby+Jesus.jpg

I don’t think it is sinful to tell children about Santa. But unless we relay it back to Jesus, it will be counterproductive to developing healthy Christian faith.

I also see nothing completely wrong with telling our children about Santa because, in a way - not the way atheists make it out to be, though - he is analogous to God.When we were young, we used to believe God really was a big, old man with a long white beard (as the atheists would make Him out to be). That was because we could not understand or accept God in His true form. Most of us still can’t understand God’s infinity or being outside of the universe. But we can accept it.

Yes, we could understand Saint Nicholas as he really is when we are children. But I don’t think children much understand the wonder of Heaven, when candy and toys are so much more entertaining here and now, much less the power Saint Nicholas has when he’s not on Earth physically anymore.

Santa Claus, if we as Christians wield him properly, can segueway into Saint Nicholas, just as the “old guy in the clouds” can segue into the infinite, eternal, living God. We can use things that children grasp easier to lead them into deeper truths. It would also make the transition from “Santa is real” to “We lied to you” much, much less jarring, and it still leaves the kids with something to believe in, that is real.

I do believe teaching kids Santa is real and then telling them he is not is a very bad idea, analogous to telling kids God is a big, powerful man in the sky and then telling us He doesn’t exist.
Love this statue. We have a copy of it in our living room every Christmas. Santa comes to my house every Christmas, and will continue to do so. My children also attend CCD classes, and see no dichotomy between Jesus and Santa. You can have both at Christmas, as long as you teach your children not to lose sight of the real reason for the Holy Day. I ask my children why Santa picked this very special night out of all the others to give gifts to the children of the worlds, and to them the answer is obvious - it’s because “Christmas is Jesus’s birthday.” They get it. Santa reinforces the importance of the birth of the Savior in a way that sinks into kids minds. It is our job as parents not to let Santa supplant the real meaning. But that does not necessarily require throwing out the idea of Santa Claus.

Peace,
Robert
 
I don’t even have to go into the fact that most of the imagery surrounding Santa Claus is Pagan in origin. …
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Santa_Claus

sj-r.com/top-stories/x1282421386/First-modern-Santa-being-re-created-at-presidential-museum

baic.house.gov/historical-essays/essay.html?intID=5&intSectionID=33

judiciary.house.gov/hearings/March2007/Tichenor070330.pdf

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Nast

Nast’s portrayal of the modern Santa Claus, rooted in Saint Nicholas, and his Germanic roots, existed to the favor of Union troops and therefore, bore a resemblance to Uncle Sam. Although, it was The Republican Party, that heralded abolition, many blacks left: when policies became racially opposed to blacks. Therefore, many blacks became Democrats. Through Abraham Lincoln’s era anti-Catholicism prevailed, “The Bible Riots”, killing 20, and burning down more than 100 schools, and homes, in Philadelphia, PA – Republican Party bigotry – under “nativism” in opposition to Catholicism. The Republican Party originated a number of secret societies, and conspiracy theories, in opposition to Catholicism. Santa Claus – based on Saint Nicholas – nonetheless opposed Catholicism to the favor of Nast’s Germanic Protestant views, portraying of course, Santa Claus as a Union member favoring hostility against Catholics. Santa Claus is more of Catholic origin; nonetheless, Santa Claus is a bigoted anti-Catholic Republican. That being said, it is in the past; additionally, the word “blasphemy” with respect to Santa Claus, may be appropriate.
 
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Santa_Claus

sj-r.com/top-stories/x1282421386/First-modern-Santa-being-re-created-at-presidential-museum

baic.house.gov/historical-essays/essay.html?intID=5&intSectionID=33

judiciary.house.gov/hearings/March2007/Tichenor070330.pdf

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Nast

Nast’s portrayal of the modern Santa Claus, rooted in Saint Nicholas, and his Germanic roots, existed to the favor of Union troops and therefore, bore a resemblance to Uncle Sam. Although, it was The Republican Party, that heralded abolition, many blacks left: when policies became racially opposed to blacks. Therefore, many blacks became Democrats. Through Abraham Lincoln’s era anti-Catholicism prevailed, “The Bible Riots”, killing 20, and burning down more than 100 schools, and homes, in Philadelphia, PA – Republican Party bigotry – under “nativism” in opposition to Catholicism. The Republican Party originated a number of secret societies, and conspiracy theories, in opposition to Catholicism. Santa Claus – based on Saint Nicholas – nonetheless opposed Catholicism to the favor of Nast’s Germanic Protestant views, portraying of course, Santa Claus as a Union member favoring hostility against Catholics. Santa Claus is more of Catholic origin; nonetheless, Santa Claus is a bigoted anti-Catholic Republican. That being said, it is in the past; additionally, the word “blasphemy” with respect to Santa Claus, may be appropriate.
someone is anti-Republican.
😛

Republicans aren’t anti-Catholic any more (luckily). In fact (sadly) Democrats are more anti-Catholic now.

So I suppose the fact that santa is fat and jolly and all that in other countries is because they are “anti-Catholic”. btw Germany isn’t anti-Catholic, even in the Protestant areas in northeastern Germany. Traditionally the Reformed, not the Lutherans, were more anti-Catholic. And Germany is more Catholic. And santa claus as we know him has origins in the Dutch Sinterklaas, who has origins in Saint Nicholas.
 
Love this statue. We have a copy of it in our living room every Christmas. Santa comes to my house every Christmas, and will continue to do so. My children also attend CCD classes, and see no dichotomy between Jesus and Santa. You can have both at Christmas, as long as you teach your children not to lose sight of the real reason for the Holy Day. I ask my children why Santa picked this very special night out of all the others to give gifts to the children of the worlds, and to them the answer is obvious - it’s because “Christmas is Jesus’s birthday.” They get it. Santa reinforces the importance of the birth of the Savior in a way that sinks into kids minds. It is our job as parents not to let Santa supplant the real meaning. But that does not necessarily require throwing out the idea of Santa Claus.

Peace,
Robert
**
Exactly.**
 
All of what you mentioned is mortally sinful and should be avoided at all costs.

Troll alert going off. 😦
Wait, what?! A weather condition is mortally sinful? How again is taking a quiet stroll and listening to wildlife something that ‘should be avoided at all costs?’

Come on. The issue has been discussed, by all sides and all extremes. Get off it, people, and try to enjoy the last nine days of Christmas.
 
Wait, what?! A weather condition is mortally sinful? How again is taking a quiet stroll and listening to wildlife something that ‘should be avoided at all costs?’
.
Um…re-read my post. What I said was clearly tongue in cheek. I don’t think any of it is mortally sinful.
 
Despite all the anger on the part of people who see nothing wrong with Santa Claus, I still haven’t seen a rational explanation for it.

Why is it acceptable to lie to children to get them to believe in certain kinds of magic, like elves and flying reindeer? What’s the difference between flying reindeer and, say, a flying broomstick?

This is just a socially acceptable form of lying to deceive children into believing in magic, all the while running the risk of overshadowing Christ.

So we have lying, magic, and materialism all rolled into one. Why defend this absurd tradition?
 
Despite all the anger on the part of people who see nothing wrong with Santa Claus, I still haven’t seen a rational explanation for it.

Why is it acceptable to lie to children to get them to believe in certain kinds of magic, like elves and flying reindeer? What’s the difference between flying reindeer and, say, a flying broomstick?

This is just a socially acceptable form of lying to deceive children into believing in magic, all the while running the risk of overshadowing Christ.

So we have lying, magic, and materialism all rolled into one. Why defend this absurd tradition?
A flying broomstick does not exist!😃

Again, Santa is not a lie! He is very real. Very real. And his generosity points to Christ - why can’t you see that!🤷
 
Despite all the anger on the part of people who see nothing wrong with Santa Claus, I still haven’t seen a rational explanation for it.

Why is it acceptable to lie to children to get them to believe in certain kinds of magic, like elves and flying reindeer? What’s the difference between flying reindeer and, say, a flying broomstick?

This is just a socially acceptable form of lying to deceive children into believing in magic, all the while running the risk of overshadowing Christ.

So we have lying, magic, and materialism all rolled into one. Why defend this absurd tradition?
oh for heaven’s sake. must we always have blanket generalizations thrown at us with absolutely NOTHING to support them but a person’s use of rhetoric and thinly veiled hostility during a time that should be filled with goodwill?

I must have missed the memo that said, "peace on earth to all of good will. . .unless of course they have at any point in time uttered the words “Santa Claus” without following it with “That wretched heretical conspiracy of evil” in which case they have committed the unforgiveable sin. . .🤷
 
Everybody has their own opinions, and I don’t really see either side convincing the other. I suppose you could say that telling our children that there is a Santa is lying, but then again, telling my wife a certain dress doesn’t show off a few extra holiday pounds when it does is lying as well. If lying is lying, then I guess I shouldn’t tell my son that he writes his name well when he doesn’t yet.
Personally, I have never met a person who lost their faith in God when they found out Santa wasn’t real. I have never met a child who doesn’t know that Jesus’ birth is the reason for Christmas. Even my 4 year old son, who was super excited for Santa, also knew what Christmas is all about. He knows that without Jesus, there would be no Christmas, and he’s just 4.
To me, there just seems to be a difference between Santa, who we discuss for maybe a month or two a year, and Jesus, whom we talk about and pray to daily. Going to Church and seeing the Sacrifice on the altar every week is much different than telling our kids to go to bed super early one night or else Santa won’t come to the house.
Do stores blow Christmas out of proportion and secularize it to no end? Of course they do. Do we go overboard buying gifts for one another? On ocassion- I know we did this year. But as I said in an earlier post, Santa is one more mere manifestation of love. Much like a bedtime story has morals- Santa has a moral. The very idea of Santa helps kids know that you can believe in something you can’t see. Much like as adults, we believe in Jesus and the Resurrection though we haven’t put our hands through his side or put our fingers into the nail holes.
The very idea of Santa, when used properly, is a learning tool to bring people closer to God, not drive them away. Because Santa IS real. I’m Santa. Other parents are Santa. Am I a jolly fat man in a red suit? Though I could lose a few pounds 😊 , the answer is no. But I am Santa. Santa, as an idea, exists. And he is a wonderful way to bring people closer to Jesus.
Now, I am sure that some parents put too much emphasis on the reindeer and Santa, and not enough on Jesus, but that isn’t Santa’s fault. That’s the fault of the parent. Noone that I have seen posting here falls into that category, but I’m sure there are some out there in the real world. I just don’t think that that justifies Santa being blasphemous. And someday, when my children stop believing in Santa as a man with a beard and red suit, I trust that the teachings my wife and I have been instilling in them about Christ and God will lead them deeper into their faith…
Besides, if I tell them there is no Santa, they might not think that Peter Pan exists either, and I don’t have the heart to tell them Neverland isn’t real…🙂

I hope you all had a Merry Christmas!!
 
oh for heaven’s sake. must we always have blanket generalizations thrown at us with absolutely NOTHING to support them but a person’s use of rhetoric and thinly veiled hostility during a time that should be filled with goodwill?

I must have missed the memo that said, "peace on earth to all of good will. . .unless of course they have at any point in time uttered the words “Santa Claus” without following it with “That wretched heretical conspiracy of evil” in which case they have committed the unforgiveable sin. . .🤷
Thankfully, there is no such thing as an unforgiveable sin. Moreover, I have never claimed to judge the sins of another, merely pointed out the facts that Santa Claus is a lie, is “magical,” and overshadows Christ. I don’t see the good in it, nor have I seen so much as an attempt at a logical counter argument. The best the pro-Santa crowd can muster is a facile Santa Claus-magic and lies are OK. “Not really magic and lies at all. Not like those other magic and lies. Santa Claus is a good lie, right? It’s good magic, not like that other magic, the bad kind.”

Well, sorry if I’m not convinced by these non-arguments and appeals to emotion. You folks need to apply a little logic to the situation and see the Santa Claus tradition for what it is. Lying, magic, and materialism that overshadows Christ.

Is it a sin? It’s not for me to judge. Neither myself nor any of the sensible people in this thread have suggested that they are in a position to judge sin. Sin is between God and the sinner.

Is Santa Claus a lie? Yes. To lie is to tell a falsehood with the intent to deceive another into believing it. Intent is not a factor. Lies are lies, regardless of good intent.

Is the whole fiction of Santa Claus based on magic? Yes. This is pretty obvious; everybody admits to this one. What’s keeping those reindeer up in the air? Magic. How is that any different than a ouija board? I know I certainly wouldn’t go around trying to deceive children into thinking they can contact the dead with a ouija board, so why is it ok to deceive children into believing reindeer can fly, or that elves make toys? If somebody can provide me an answer to this question I may reconsider my position, but I don’t see this happening. It’s one of those things where people just do think about it. The only difference between Santa Claus-magic and other sorts of occult magic is that one is socially acceptable in the west and the other is not. But just because something is socially acceptable doesn’t mean it’s ok. People need to apply a little critical thought.

Does Santa Claus overshadow Christ? Absolutely! This one is also a no-brainer. Christmas shouldn’t be about getting gifts and materialism. People say that atheists are the ones trying to take the Christ out of Christmas, but they don’t need to, we have already done it for them.
 
There is a very good reason Santa lives at the North Pole – that is the native habitat of the Flying Reindeer, Rangifer tarandus volaris.* Without these unique creatures Santa could not make it around the world to deliver presents.* While there are many flying animals who could help Santa pull the sleigh, reindeer have the advantage that they are already well adapted to extreme cold because they live in Arctic regions.* This allows them to fly very high and take advantage of the thinner atmosphere to go quickly.

Lift
The Flying Reindeer have co-opted normal ruminant anatomy to achieve lift.* Ruminants like cows have four stomachs to help them break down grass and especially cellulose.* However, in areas where reindeer live they have had to switch their diet because of the very sparse vegetation.* Much of Scandinavia was covered by glaciers in the last ice age which scoured away the arable soil, leaving very old crystalline rocks.* These rocks support lichen, the main diet of the reindeer.* The lichen is also breaking down the rocks, which contain many mineral deposits including iron, copper, nickel, zinc, silver and gold, and the reindeer eat large amounts of metals along with their normal food.* Metals react with acid, including stomach acid, to produce hydrogen gas, and when they want to fly the Flying Reindeer collect and store this gas in another of their stomachs which is able to greatly enlarge.* Hydrogen is of course lighter than air, and allows the reindeer to lift in the same way as Zeppelins did.

Movement
Once in the air, the reindeer need to move forward.* They do this by taking advantage of a cold weather adaptation, their thick fur coat.* The Flying Reindeer have developed the coat on their legs to be extremely thick and long, with dense matted inner fur and long smooth guard hairs as an outer layer.* This configuration allows their legs to act as oars or paddles and they can ‘row’ through the air.

Light
The Flying Reindeer has another advantage for Santa, although technically it is not the reindeer but their food.* Many of the lichens the reindeer eat are phosphorescent, which means they glow in the dark.* In winter reindeer find their food by using their noses to push aside the snow covering the lichens.* This means they are rubbing their noses across the lichen and many small glowing particles get stuck to their nose and muzzle.* The effect looks as if their nose is glowing and allows them to see at night.

science-at-home.org/how-do-reindeer-fly/
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top