N
nickybr38
Guest
I do.Do you believe that God literally put Adam a sleep and created the first woman from his rib?
I do.Do you believe that God literally put Adam a sleep and created the first woman from his rib?
Oh. Well, thereās the problem, then.I donāt see how anybody can call a pseudo-scientific dissertation on the biology of flying reindeer anything but a silly, elaborate lie.
Oh. Well, thereās the problem, then.
You simply canātāor wonātāsee the difference between fantasy, stories, myths, legends etc. . .
and āliesā.
Since I donāt know whether this is something you can āhelpā yourself with, all I can do is offer you sympathy and gentle encouragement to try not to āboxā things into some narrow little category of āliesā.
Can we drop forget about this debate⦠Saying Santa is blasphemous is silly and overkillā¦
How about this⦠We dont get caught up in secular Christmasā¦
This is such a silly waste of space on CAF![]()
Iāll say a prayer that people who think like this will give up the hollowness of truth-relativism and start to follow the Churchās teaching on the absolute nature of truth.You simply canātāor wonātāsee the difference between fantasy, stories, myths, legends etc.
There is nothing I find convincing about the post-modern argument, that āSanta Claus is poetically real, therefore it isnāt a lie to tell children that he is literally real.ā The bottom line is that Santa Claus has no physical existence, and to attempt to convince a child otherwise is a lie.The āYes, Virginiaā letter perfectly captures the āit makes me happy and doesnāt hurt anyone so itās OKā point of view, which wouldāve been considered sophomoric, at best, before the ascent of relativism.
Treat it as you would the ābig, old man in the cloudsā scenario. Donāt officially say it is wrong until they are old enough, but donāt feed it to them as if it is true. Just sit back. Time will sort this out on its own. Let them believe in Santa for a while.I had to quote this, just in case anybody missed it the first time, because it really explains the whole problem so well:
Thereās a simple maxim: āHonesty is the best policy.āLet them believe in Santa for a while.
Luke 18: 10Iāll say a prayer that people who think like this will give up the hollowness of truth-relativism and start to follow the Churchās teaching on the absolute nature of truth.
Today, having a clear faith based on the Creed of the Church is often labeled as fundamentalism. Whereas relativism, that is, letting oneself be ātossed here and there, carried about by every wind of doctrineā, seems the only attitude that can cope with modern times. We are building a dictatorship of relativism** that does not recognize anything as definitive** and whose ultimate goal consists solely of oneās own ego and desires.
We, however, have a different goal: the Son of God, the true man. He is the measure of true humanism. An āadultā faith is not a faith that follows the trends of fashion and the latest novelty; a mature adult faith is deeply rooted in friendship with Christ. It is this friendship that opens us up to all that is good and gives us a criterion by which to distinguish the true from the false, and deceipt from truth.
vatican.va/gpII/documents/homily-pro-eligendo-pontifice_20050418_en.html
Your absolutley rightāThereās a simple maxim: āHonesty is the best policy.ā
Thank you for stating this so well.So hereās my honest appraisal of your attitude to Christmas.
It sucks.
Who the hell are you to be so scrupulous that you begin to label your fellow Christians as liars and accuse them of introducing moral relativism into their lives. Moral relativism is the preserve of the non-religious, the irreligious and the immoral and amoral.
That may be so, but it is still a lie. Incidentally, you seem to be under the misapprehension that I am referring to moral relativism. This is not strictly accurate. What is going on in the āYes, Virginaā argument, and what Card. Ratzinger is decrying in the quote above, is ātruth relativism,ā the idea that something is true or false based on its consequences, not by virtue of being ontologically prior. This is different from moral relativism, but truth relativism is still contrary to the Church.Who the hell are you to be so scrupulous that you begin to label your fellow Christians as liars and accuse them of introducing moral relativism into their lives. Moral relativism is the preserve of the non-religious, the irreligious and the immoral and amoralā¦
:clapping::clapping::clapping:Your absolutley rightā
So hereās my honest appraisal of your attitude to Christmas.
It sucks.
You have absolutely no idea of the role of culture in shaping ātraditionsā. Christmas ātraditionsā vary from one country to the other. According to your line of, ahem, reasoning, each cultural change is a lie, because it drifts from what you think is the ātruthā.
Sinta Klauss, Santa Claus, St. Nicholas, whatever, is all representative of the Christmas idea of freindship, community, sharing and giving. All the little ceremonies that one can find in various countries can all be traced back to the initial idea of celebrating the birthday of Jesus. Some of the little traditions seem quaint, silly and even downright absurd when viewed from outside a particular culture, but their basic idea and meaning is all the same. For Catholics and even for other Christian denominations, it is all about the celebration of the Son of God.
Who cares how people do it. Who cares whether it includes flying reindeer, or fairies down the bottom of the garden. Who cares if people tell their kids that a jolly fat man delivers goodies in the middle of the night. It is all about introducing little children to the idea of Christ and to surround it with cultural mythology is normal human practice. Who are you to ādry outā the tradition so much that no-one could possibly be attracted to it? Even the very first Christians added cultural representations to their celebrations of the birth of Christ. Who the hell are you to be so scrupulous that you begin to label your fellow Christians as liars and accuse them of introducing moral relativism into their lives. Moral relativism is the preserve of the non-religious, the irreligious and the immoral and amoral.
Get thisā¦the idea of Santa Claus has even introduced Christmas into Japan in a big way, despite the fact that around only two percent of the population are Christian. Just think, a few more million people are now being exposed to the celebration of Christās birth because of what you call a ālieā. It doesnāt matter how people celebrate Christmas, as long as it is being celebrated. And think about this a little more deeply - the notion of Santa Claus is now prevalent in nearly every single western nation. I, sitting in front of a computer can type in the words āone more sleepā and people in the United States, England, Scandinavia, Greece, Estonia, Russia, South Africa and a host of other countries all know exactly what I am referring to. It evokes a common symbolism. It is a unifying symbolism that even draws in the non-religious. No-one can ever take the Christ out of Christmas.
Santa Claus is a perfect way to introduce small children to the notion that there is something bigger than themselves; something magical in the world that represents the good and the holy. It isnāt long before enquiring little minds ask for more and more information as they grow, until it dawns on them that Santa Claus is one small aspect of a bigger celebration. And if letters to santa and emails to elves becomes part of that tradition, so be it. If people walking around in Santa hats adds to the joy and fellowship, so be it. You just have to grow up enough to realise the magic contained in it all.
Crass language? What crass language? There was definitely no crass language in his post!Judging by the crass language you used in this post, you are getting angered over the whole thing.
So hereās my honest appraisal of your attitude to Christmas.
Judging by the crass language you used in this post, you are getting angered over the whole thing. I would suggest you take some time to pray about it. Also ten deep breaths might be helpful. I hope we can discuss this further when you are in a calmer frame of mind. God bless.
No crass language was used.Crass language? What crass language? There was definitely no crass language in his post!![]()