T
Timothysis
Guest
- I don’t know.
- not answer.
- I don’t know.
- not answer.
Nope, it’s a realistic answer. You’re under no obligation to “advance the conversation” with the woman who asks about abortion clinics, and nothing is going to happen to you for refusing to answer. Equating this question of yours with the nazis at the door scenario is just ludicrous.#2 is not an answer to the scenario and it does not advance the conversation. It is akin to responding to the scenario about nazis looking for Jews and saying that your response would be to just close the door. I’m sure that Saints Augustine, Thomas Aquinas and Raymond of Toulouse would find your response to be unsatisfactory.
Yup…it’s sad.Poor child.![]()
He’s just being deliberately obtuse at this point. I’m not going to entertain that latest tangent of his anymore, especially since it’s already been answered multiple times. So back to the original topic of lying about Santa Claus.Either way, how on earth did we go from Santa Clause to abortion? That’s just depressing…
- It’s the lesser of two evils.
- It’s practical. I’d like to think they’d be smirking right now.
I’m afraid you don’t follow. When I say “advance the conversation” I mean the conversation HERE, not with the woman.Nope, it’s a realistic answer. You’re under no obligation to “advance the conversation” with the woman who asks about abortion clinics, and nothing is going to happen to you for refusing to answer. Equating it with the nazis at the door scenario is just ludicrous.
Great! Start a thread.I’m afraid you don’t follow. When I say “advance the conversation” I mean the conversation HERE, not with the woman.
I second that motion!Great! Start a thread.![]()
thank you comrade :tiphat:I like your location, exoflare. Subtle and classy.
You’ve just got that whole USSA thing going for you, don’t cha? (xcept for the hat)thank you comrade :tiphat:
Is not the topic about the morality of lying? I would advise you to steer clear of the Catholic Encyclopedia article about “lying” because it approaches the subject from an intellectual viewpoint that you seem to miss.He’s just being deliberately obtuse at this point. I’m not going to entertain that latest tangent of his anymore, especially since it’s already been answered multiple times. So back to the original topic of lying about Santa Claus.![]()
Children believe in all sorts of things, and pretend to be all sorts of things. Should I punish my daughters because they’re pretending to be one of those "Angry Birds?"
No, pretend is quite different from belief in superstitions.
ValPal;9996488:
No, pretend is quite different from belief in superstitions.Children believe in all sorts of things, and pretend to be all sorts of things. Should I punish my daughters because they’re pretending to be one of those "Angry Birds?"
how is telling your kids about santa claus a superstition?
Perhaps, but have you seen his actual arguments as to what constitutes a lie and why? He addresses them elsewhere (BTW, Dr. Feser would probably agree with you on the piano and dress examples, interestingly enough).I maintain that Dr. Feser, with all of his knowledge and cleverness, does not even readily understand exactly what constitutes a lie. A “lie” is usually told to evade responsibility, to gain an unfair advantage or to take advantage of a situation for personal gain. It is not a “lie” to tell a young one that their performance on the piano was “beautiful” when it really wasn’t, or to tell someone that, yes, you think their new dress is pretty when deep down inside it really doesn’t do anything for you.
Of course not.Does anyone honestly think that they will one day stand in judgement to God Almighty for telling their little ones about Santa or the Easter Bunny, or seeing the joy and amazement in their eyes on Christmas and Easter morn?
Excellent points. How can something be an intrinsic evil when it impedes an act of injustice? Is it better that we “tell the truth” and let the injustice of murder be perpetrated upon the Jews? What would you think of the following conversation;
“The gestapo asked, so I told them that there were Jews hiding in the attic.”
“What happened to them?”
“They killed them all. But thank God I didn’t sin by telling a lie.”
How would the reader here react to the following situation;
You are walking down the street when a pregnant woman asks, “I’m new here; do you know of an abortion clinic around here?”
You know for certain that there is a clinic right around the corner. How do you reply?
Timothy, have you seen all of the lying threads around CAF? Do you know how often questions such as these crop up? Do you really think such arguments haven’t been addressed? Of course they have! At least actually respond to the counterarguments instead of giving these situations and expecting them to stand on their own. These are arguments from emotion. If you want me to I’ll link you to another thread going on right now. These questions are addressed there.(And please don’t dodge the question by saying that you wouldn’t say anything or you would try talking her out of it.)
So you’re asking us what we’d do in the hypothetical world where all of our choices in conversation are ONLY between answering a question directly and lying about the answer? Because this hypothetical world doesn’t advance a lot of discussion here in the real world, where we could utilize our other options.It is dodging the question by refusing to answer. I intend it to be in the same speculative vein as asking "how many angels can dance on the head of a pin?" Replying "angels don’t dance" doesn’t advance the conversation.