Sarah Palin Says Obama Most Pro-Abortion President, Bashes Charlie Crist

  • Thread starter Thread starter juliee
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
“People of God” do not sermonize other people of God. I also asked you a question which you did not answer. Did you, or did you not imply that I was being racist by using the word tolerance? Talk about hopping off the proverbial hook.:rolleyes: Look first to the plank in your own eye. Certainly God can turn bo’s heart. God is God. That doesn’t mean I am obliged to respect or admire bo or anyone who thoroughly disgusts me. Bo hasn’t slapped MY cheek but has been an instrument of millions of babies being killed. I leave final judgement of him and those who support him to the Almighty. .
If this makes you feel ok, then by all means, hate away.
 
We do. President Barack Obama. Do not discount what Our Lord can do.
Occupying the Oval Office does not a leader make. I have nothing personal against the president, I do not personally know him. I have a great deal of opposition to his policies and the cabinet he has put together.
 
Imagine if everyone started praying for Obama immediately upon him taking office instead of spending time criticizing. His heart would turn and his policies with them. I think more people relish complaining and hating better than doing something proactive and worthwhile. One can pray while still in protest of policies (e.g., abortion) that are wrong, especially in protest of policies that are wrong.
 
I think Ron Paul is more pro-life than Sarah Palin or any other one of those talking heads. At least he does something about it by actually introducing bills in Congress, not just make sarcastic remarks in a shrill voice.
 
Imagine if everyone started praying for Obama immediately upon him taking office instead of spending time criticizing. His heart would turn and his policies with them. I think more people relish complaining and hating better than doing something proactive and worthwhile. One can pray while still in protest of policies (e.g., abortion) that are wrong, especially in protest of policies that are wrong.
How do you know we don’t? Aren’t you being rash in your judgement? There are many avenues to being pro active and having worthwhile results. How do you speak out against the evils this man promotes? The Church states that as Catholics we must speak out and educate souls about the evils in the world. Do you? Those who are only sanctimonious and only preach as to what others must do to make changes leave a great void in the universe.
 
Imagine if everyone started praying for Obama immediately upon him taking office instead of spending time criticizing. His heart would turn and his policies with them. I think more people relish complaining and hating better than doing something proactive and worthwhile. One can pray while still in protest of policies (e.g., abortion) that are wrong, especially in protest of policies that are wrong.
If this makes you feel ok, then by all means, hate away.
You still haven’t answered my question. Until you explain yourself I will take it as an insult and a narrow view of tolerance.
 
Imagine if everyone started praying for Obama immediately upon him taking office instead of spending time criticizing. His heart would turn and his policies with them. I think more people relish complaining and hating better than doing something proactive and worthwhile. One can pray while still in protest of policies (e.g., abortion) that are wrong, especially in protest of policies that are wrong.
What a cynical point of view of your fellow man. You are painting with a very broad brush. Perhaps you are interpreting criticism of policies as hatred. In that case, I believe you err. And you don’t really know whether people are doing anything to change the situation, now do you? And you don’t really know whether others are praying for the president. I know we do in my parish every week.
 
I usually do not disclose whom I voted for; however, in this case, it is important that you know I did NOT vote for President Obama. Once the outcome is complete; however, I trust in the Lord and prayer, and refrain from remarking negatively against our county’s leader; especially in ways that are disrespectful of the Office of the President. I find this to be unpatriotic.
Hear, hear, Veronica (or is it “here, here”? I’m never sure about that).

At any rate, I echo your sentiments wholeheartedly. We who are in opposition to the government of the day used to be called the “loyal opposition”. I hope that ideal still holds true today. One can disagree with the president–even passionately, even completely–while retaining the appropriate level of patriotic respect for him and for his office.

With respect to Sarah Palin: thank you, Governor, for stating the obvious; your ability to do as much is the most anyone can say in praise of you, however, at least when it comes to your political prowess.

Ambition to high office must be coupled with a capability to perform that office. I do not care how conservative she claims to be or how devout an Evangelical Protestant she is; Mrs. Palin has consistently demonstrated a lack of the intellectual rigour necessary for one aspiring to the office of president. She may pretend to be some renowned conservative guru all she likes, but she’s no William F. Buckley, Jr., she’s no George Will, she’s no Newt Gingrich, &c.

Mrs. Palin inherits, not the mantle of Ronald Reagan, but of Dan Quayle and George W. Bush. That’s the line I place her in, with one less qualified than the one before:

Dan Quayle > George W. Bush > Sarah Palin

That is her provenance and her political pedigree.

I say all of these things, incidentally, as a life-long conservative Republican and as a faithful Roman Catholic.

From any more Quayles or Ws or Palins, O Lord, in your mercy, spare us. Grant our nation truly intelligent and truly faithful leaders who have both a sense of decency and a brain!
 
What a cynical point of view of your fellow man. You are painting with a very broad brush. Perhaps you are interpreting criticism of policies as hatred. In that case, I believe you err. And you don’t really know whether people are doing anything to change the situation, now do you? And you don’t really know whether others are praying for the president. I know we do in my parish every week.
If you are taking any of my comments personally, you may want to ask yourself why. Criticism is not what I have witnessed here. I was responding to the disrespect towards our Country and its leadership. I protest Obama. I do not say disparaging things about him, nor disregard a sitting president. Further, I do know that people are doing things to change the situation. My observation was “imagine if everyone” were - key word “everyone.”
 
Hear, hear, Veronica (or is it “here, here”? I’m never sure about that).

At any rate, I echo your sentiments wholeheartedly. We who are in opposition to the government of the day used to be called the “loyal opposition”. I hope that ideal still holds true today. One can disagree with the president–even passionately, even completely–while retaining the appropriate level of patriotic respect for him and for his office.

With respect to Sarah Palin: thank you, Governor, for stating the obvious; your ability to do as much is the most anyone can say in praise of you, however, at least when it comes to your political prowess.

Ambition to high office must be coupled with a capability to perform that office. I do not care how conservative she claims to be or how devout an Evangelical Protestant she is; Mrs. Palin has consistently demonstrated a lack of the intellectual rigour necessary for one aspiring to the office of president. She may pretend to be some renowned conservative guru all she likes, but she’s no William F. Buckley, Jr., she’s no George Will, she’s no Newt Gingrich, &c.

Mrs. Palin inherits, not the mantle of Ronald Reagan, but of Dan Quayle and George W. Bush. That’s the line I place her in, with one less qualified than the one before:

Dan Quayle > George W. Bush > Sarah Palin

That is her provenance and her political pedigree.

I say all of these things, incidentally, as a life-long conservative Republican and as a faithful Roman Catholic.

From any more Quayles or Ws or Palins, O Lord, in your mercy, spare us. Grant our nation truly intelligent and truly faithful leaders who have both a sense of decency and a brain!
Truly. Loyalty to our country is key! All well stated.
 
I think Ron Paul is more pro-life than Sarah Palin or any other one of those talking heads. At least he does something about it by actually introducing bills in Congress, not just make sarcastic remarks in a shrill voice.
That’s part of her “appeal” to some. She’s not “manufactured.” She’s “Real.”:o

I’m not saying I would vote for her—I agree she is not qualified enough.

But I understand the “Everyman/Everywoman” appeal she has for some.
 
Consider the word tolerance - one often linked to dealings with race. Then ask yourself why you are using that particular word.

Oh brother, Veronica. Are you sure you didn’t vote for Barry? You sound just like a dawgone democrat trotting out the race card—their ultimate and only defense these days.

I think it is you who should ask yourself why you are making a racial issue about a non-racial issue.
 
Veronica7978;7030066:
Consider the word tolerance - one often linked to dealings with race. Then ask yourself why you are using that particular word.

Oh brother, Veronica. Are you sure you didn’t vote for Barry? You sound just like a dawgone democrat trotting out the race card—their ultimate and only defense these days.

I think it is you who should ask yourself why you are making a racial issue about a non-racial issue.
God bless you with peace.
 
“People of God” do not sermonize other people of God. I also asked you a question which you did not answer. Did you, or did you not imply that I was being racist by using the word tolerance? Talk about hopping off the proverbial hook.:rolleyes: Look first to the plank in your own eye. Certainly God can turn bo’s heart. God is God. That doesn’t mean I am obliged to respect or admire bo or anyone who thoroughly disgusts me. Bo hasn’t slapped MY cheek but has been an instrument of millions of babies being killed. I leave final judgement of him and those who support him to the Almighty. .
By now the whole world should realize that it was God who hand picked Obama to head the most powerful nation. His election is a baffling miracle in a land that has demonstrated rabid intolerance based on color and religion.
INTROSPECT PLEASE!
  1. Is it pro-adultery to deem it unfit to introduce a penal law against “lustful looks”?
  2. Is it pro-murder to think it unwise to introduce penal laws against mothers who abort their babies?
  3. Can someone who is committed to bring down abortion rates through positive campaigns and other means, be branded pro-abortion?
  4. Permission for divorce as per Mosaic law: who was at fault? Moses or the hard-hearted people who demanded and got such a law from Moses?
  5. In this case who is at fault? God or humans: Furthermore, since they did not think it worthwhile to retain the knowledge of God, he gave them over to a depraved mind, to do what ought not to be done. (Rom 1:28)
    OBAMA ZINDABAD! GOD BLESS OBAMA!
 
ELTS, the last time I checked, none of us have to run our votes past the Bishop before we go to the polls, nor does a priest. We are not all mindless sheep that needs someone to tell us what to do. Our vote is guaranteed by the Constitution, not the Bible.

This does not mean our moral and religious values should not impact our vote, but to even suggest “I wonder what the Bishop would think” is preposterous.
 
ELTS, the last time I checked, none of us have to run our votes past the Bishop before we go to the polls, nor does a priest. We are not all mindless sheep that needs someone to tell us what to do.

This does not mean our moral and religious values should not impact our vote, but to even suggest “I wonder what the Bishop would think” is preposterous.
Well said Pamm!
I pity complex americans in general and catholics in particular, who always sterotype (brand) their leaders and are by nature opinion forming. American catholics should know this:
  • There are abundant excellent humans who are catholics at heart but officially they may be protestants or non-christians (like Nicodemus who came by night to listen to Jesus). This is God’s way of sending His light to all.
  • There are many name-sake catholics who are actually fundamentalists, heretics or even atheists. This is Satan’s way of infiltrating God’s flock
  • Catholics should learn to be led by God’s spirit and not make rash judgements.
  • St. Ignatius’ method of election (decision making) is not only worth learning but most essential
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top