R
redrosetea
Guest
It is no different than proving the Trinity…Where is that in the Bible?You say it now prove it. You use scripture to try to prove she is but now you say you can’t.
It is no different than proving the Trinity…Where is that in the Bible?You say it now prove it. You use scripture to try to prove she is but now you say you can’t.
Ok, I’ll bite…why did you leave the Church, and how old were you?You don’t know me so let me tell you. I was raised Catholic, baptized Catholic, made my first Holy Communion, Confermed, the hole 10 yards, went to seminary to be a priest for a year. Now I’m a non-denoinational preacher. So don’t tell me I can’t say the same when I have lived it and still living it.
You may think its not arrogant but I do, like it or not.
Rev Kev, do you believe in Lourdes? Mary’s appearances there? You have a lot of personal beliefs, and I was wondering if this was one of them.Did I say I cling to the sola scripture. I don’t recall ever saying that. That is your assumption not my words.
Never said the Bible was the sole authority. Once again you are making assumptions on what I never said.
Where did I say that I was giving my privite interpretation of the Bible. I have researched and went to school. Besides everything is ones personal interpretation. See everything has to be interprated eather by one person or a group of people even the Bible was interprated by someone.
So its not ok for someone to interprate but it was ok in the 4th century for someone to because of tradition.
Read between the lines about the Atheists. Sure everything wasn’t written down so how do you come up with this about Mary. It wasn’t written down so who’s to say who’s right and who’s wrong. Remember it wasn’t written down so I guess its has to do with someones interpretation.
Yes, this is what I wanted, (thank you, distracted) Do you believe, Rev Kevin, that Lourdes is more than just a story?Good story
No, not to someone who believes Christ has the power to keep His word.How many yeaars ago was it about 2000. If something can be changed in a room of 10 people in less the 2 min. wouldn’t it stand to reason that something like that could have happened over a 2000 year period.
Maybe I’m not making my point clear enough. Let me articulate it a bit further. We believe and agree, I assume, that Christ was the only begotten Son of God, who came down from heaven for our sakes. For our salvation, he suffered, died, was buried and arose again on the third day. He ascended into heaven and His kingdom will have no end. Now, if Catholics prefer to believe Mary was born immaculate, does this have any bearing on their salvation, in your honest opinion? Does your believing she was a sinner, have any bearing on your salvation? In my humble opinion, I don’t believe it does and pray I’m right on this one. It’s not for me to judge another at all. I don’t want to get off my point here, which is, why is this such an important argument? Maybe it’s not that important to you, but it seems we have many Protestant visitors that come here and carry on like we’re endangering our salvation by believing God chose to have a spotless vessel for His Son to come into this world.Last night I was going through some other threads and this is what I found:
Estesbob {Catholic} said this “I don’t demand that others accept my PERSONAL INTERPRETATION of scripture.” Notice the “my personal” part of his statement If its ok for a Catholic to have their personal interpretation why is it wrong for others to have theirs. Sounds like do as I say not as I do.
The Bible is not the sole authority. Christ is.
The sola scripture is not the sole authority, Christ is.
Yes you are right. Now all the things you mentioned are written down in the Bible.
On the point of a 1500 year old Church, we can offer plenty of history to show the Catholic Church was here. The secular world has spent much of the time exposing sinful men of the Church, in hopes of somehow disposing of the Church it seems.If disagreeing means saying wrong then guilty. Then you are qguilty of the same thing by saying we are wrong. Be careful when you accuse others of the same thing you are doing. Now by saying we are wrong puts you in the same catigory that you put me in and that is being borderline arrogantly. On the same line what do you expect us to do, say oh yes everything you are telling us is right. See you are doing the same thing to us that you say we do to you. In otherwords what you are saying is we, Catholics, can say it to you but you can’t say it to us. I know where I’m at, it also a non-Catholic site now have you read what this site is meant to be, if not look under “important forum information” then click on the non-Catholic part and read what it says but I’ll save you the trouble, “Explore the history and beliefs of non-Catholics and non-Christian faith, dialogue and adherents.”
Now the true church is Jesus Christ not one single named religion. Do you know how many times I have heard “our church has been around from the time of Jesus and yours has been around for 1500 years.” Getting sick of hearing that, sounds like a broken record.
I don’t believe all Christians have to be a part of the Catholic Church to be a part of the body of believers. It is my opinion though, that the Catholic Church has the fullness of truth and Protestant Churches are operating without the fullness. I have explained that I believe those Churches came from the Catholic Church and they did not take everything they have when they broke away through the reformation.When someone interperted for the Catholics wasn’t it someone’s personal interpretation on what they want someone to believe is true.
No Christ did not fail nor skip generations. The true church is Christ and that is what we believe so if we believe Christ is the true church we were never left out and were always with him just with no named church because Christ is the church and if you believe in Christ you are in his church. I don’t believe one has to be Catholic to be one with Christ and in his church.
It is not my intention to stray from the topic that some find so important. As I explained, why argue such points that have no impact on one’s salvation? Is this attempting to be of the same mind and judgment that scriptures plainly tell us to be?You hit he nail on the head when you said ALL. Christ came for ALL men so they might be saved. He came for me, you, everyone in the world and wants us to be close to him but I don’t recall seeing you can be close to him only if your a Catholic. The way to salvation is through Jesus Christ himself not a named church.
I hope this answeres you questions.
Now with this said can we get back to the subject that op posted, we have strayed away from it.
Not trying to avoid anything.I don’t believe all Christians have to be a part of the Catholic Church to be a part of the body of believers. It is my opinion though, that the Catholic Church has the fullness of truth and Protestant Churches are operating without the fullness. I have explained that I believe those Churches came from the Catholic Church and they did not take everything they have when they broke away through the reformation.
It is not my intention to stray from the topic that some find so important. As I explained, why argue such points that have no impact on one’s salvation? Is this attempting to be of the same mind and judgment that scriptures plainly tell us to be?
You seem to be in a hurry to get back to the topic, because it is based on Catholic teaching and FAITH, simply because it comes without that ‘hard evidence’. It also seems to be that you are particularly interested in avoiding any discussion about some of your faith that comes without the same ‘hard evidence’…
so then where do the Eastern Orthodox come in?Jesus established one Church. if you read history you will realize it ws the Roman Catholic Church … all man-made churches came after that, after 1521 (Luther)…
as to that thing about oral tradition not being reliable…
The RCC has the REal Presence of Christ in the Church 24/7… THAT is what keeps the Word of God undiluted and undefiled or adulterated… We are not talking about ordinary human tradition… .
prove that she was.might as well have… you keep acting like we Catholics have to find in Scripture, verbatim, that mary was immaculately conceived…
And that includes some Catholics right.No, not to someone who believes Christ has the power to keep His word.
Maybe I’m not making my point clear enough. Let me articulate it a bit further. We believe and agree, I assume, that Christ was the only begotten Son of God, who came down from heaven for our sakes. For our salvation, he suffered, died, was buried and arose again on the third day. He ascended into heaven and His kingdom will have no end. Now, if Catholics prefer to believe Mary was born immaculate, does this have any bearing on their salvation, in your honest opinion? Does your believing she was a sinner, have any bearing on your salvation? In my humble opinion, I don’t believe it does and pray I’m right on this one. It’s not for me to judge another at all. I don’t want to get off my point here, which is, why is this such an important argument? Maybe it’s not that important to you, but it seems we have many Protestant visitors that come here and carry on like we’re endangering our salvation by believing God chose to have a spotless vessel for His Son to come into this world.
On the point of a 1500 year old Church, we can offer plenty of history to show the Catholic Church was here. The secular world has spent much of the time exposing sinful men of the Church, in hopes of somehow disposing of the Church it seems.
The word Catholic comes from the Greek, kata holos, which is found in the Greek translation of Acts 9:31. St. Ignatius wrote the following around 107AD, approximately the same time St. John wrote ‘Revelations’.
See that you all follow the bishop, even as Jesus Christ does the Father, and the presbytery as you would the apostles; and reverence the deacons, as being the institution of God. Let no man do anything connected with the Church without the bishop. Let that be deemed a proper Eucharist, which is [administered] either by the bishop, or by one to whom he has entrusted it. Wherever the bishop shall appear, there let the multitude [of the people] also be; even as, wherever Jesus Christ is, there is the Catholic Church. It is not lawful without the bishop either to baptize or to celebrate a love-feast; but whatsoever he shall approve of, that is also pleasing to God, so that everything that is done may be secure and valid.
For 1500 years, people believed that to be the Catholic Church. It wasn’t interpreted to mean ‘many Churches’ until it was important to justify the birth of ‘many Churches’, which started in the 1500s.
The Catholic Church has a documented history back to the time of the Apostles. None of the other denominational Churches can produce such documentation. Those Churches came from the Catholic Church through the ‘reformation’. That’s why we all believe, what some call, the ‘essentials’.
It’s sad for some to say they’re sick of hearing that, especially when they cannot produce any documentation to show otherwise. I realize it’s based on their faith, but it’s without the ‘hard evidence’ that Protestants require of certain Catholic beliefs.
(CONTINUED)
I left the church because I disagreed with their some of their beliefs and some of their teachings. I was around 25.Ok, I’ll bite…why did you leave the Church, and how old were you?
You believe whole heartedly that you are obedient to the authority of Christ without a “church”, and I believe I am obedient to the authority of Christ because I am in His Church; the Church speaks and acts with His authority.
Oh and on the analogy of ten people and the message getting skewed, the New Testament is the written from oral tradition of the first century, so if your statement is your belief then you do not trust the New or Old Testament for that matter, to be reliable. If you disagree with this premise you are not being honest.
Saul’s conversion was around the late 30’s. His first letter is thought to have been written in the late 40’s or as late as the early 50’s.
What about the Gospels, if I’m not mistaken the earliest was written about 65AD, Mark; according to the majority of scholars? If these are in fact the Gospel of Jesus Christ, the earliest work, Mark, would have been whispered from person to person around the known world for at least 30 to 35 years. Now if I use your logic, there no way that this can be reliable, therefore the Gospels are in error and cannot be trusted.
Lets see if I got this right.Yes, this is what I wanted, (thank you, distracted) Do you believe, Rev Kevin, that Lourdes is more than just a story?
The word "trinity does not appear in the Bible.It is no different than proving the Trinity…Where is that in the Bible?
What??? If Mary bore the sin Christ would have also bore it. Hmm I thought God can do anything so if he can not give Mary sin couldn’t he do the same for Christ even if Mary was with sin.Mary was redeemed by Christ to be a fit vessel for him…God operates outside of time…past present and future are the eternal now for God
If she bore the stain of original sin Christ would have also bore it…Mary is the human element in the redemption process, and as such she had to be pure
coolWhether Mary was saved before during or after conception…is really NOT IMPORTANT. Why?
Because…
What did Jesus say?
**“I AM THE TRUTH, THE WAY AND THE LIFE. NO MAN GOES TO THE FATHER EXCEPT TROUGH ME”.
**
If your father tells you, “now son, I’m the **only one **with the tickets… take this ticket and go attend the concert before the door closes”…do you stay around and ask him “eh…so did grandmother go in before or during or after you…and should I go get the ticket from her instead???”
I believe by the time you find your grandmother, the concert door would have closed. And you know what? Your grandmother will tell you “didn’t you hear what your father said??? HE HAS THE TICKETS! GOSH!!!..YOU’RE NOW SHUT OUT!”
.
It seems you’re just searching to somehow ‘win’. I have repeatedly said, WE believe, as in you and I, Protestants and Catholics. We are both believers in Christ, which makes us Christians.And that includes some Catholics right.
I know Christ has the power to keep his word.
But I don’t believe Mary was born without sin and that is what started the attack on me and my religion
Your religion believes the way they believe and mine believes the way mine believes. We all know your church was the first, its been crambed down our throuts, and ours wasn’t whoopy that don’t mean we are less of a religion or the we love God less it just proves your’s was first.
If the Holy Spirit can write Gospels through men, couldn’t the Holy Spirit guide the men of the Church to define the canon of the Bible? Couldn’t the Holy Spirit protect Christ’s Church until the consummation of the world, in affect protecting God’s truth?I left the church because I disagreed with their some of their beliefs and some of their teachings. I was around 25.
The Gospels were written by the Holy Spirit through men.
You can’t fix stupidInteresting. The Catholic Mass contains more scripture than most Protestant services, yet we are seen as non-biblical.