Well, the next time you’re in trouble, and you’re short a bottle of water, it might help to call on God.And I am sure that a Jew will use those very same verses as claiming that they were saved without Christ!
They were saved with the grace of Baptism-they just did not know it. The Prophets of the OT knew about and looked forward to Christ.
If anything they had baptism by implicit desire.
I would agree with you, however the fact that Jesus has not instituted Baptism is the reason for the discrepancy. In the New TestamentMost people who are saved by God in the scriptures are saved without baptism.
As I look throughout the NT this is what I seeMost people who are saved by God in the scriptures are saved without baptism.
Read these references:
saved
Everyone can argue about this pro and con for and against. But it is all too obvious in my oppinion…
have fun…
God is gracious. He saves his people, whether through baptism or by his infinite mercy.Psalm 22:5 To thee they cried, and were saved; in thee they trusted, and were not disappointed.
This is the way
A breath of fresh air!..God is gracious. He saves his people, whether through baptism or by his infinite mercy.
Try Titus chapter 3. Paul is in rare form…Most of the results you posted are 1) Old Testament and 2)many did not really deal with spiritual salvation.Baptismal regeneration is a new Testament requirement for salvation.
The baptism requirement can be met with “desire for baptism” or “baptism of blood”
for what?Try Titus chapter 3. Paul is in rare form…
The teaching of the Church is very simple: Outside the Church, there is no salvation. This is a defined dogma of the Church, and if you do not accept it, you cease to be united in faith to the rest of the Mystical Body. One becomes a member of the Church through Baptism into Christ. There is no other way to be saved.Most of the results you posted are 1) Old Testament and 2)many did not really deal with spiritual salvation.Baptismal regeneration is a new Testament requirement for salvation.
The baptism requirement can be met with “desire for baptism” or “baptism of blood”
Baptism is necessary for salvation.God is gracious. He saves his people, whether through baptism or by his infinite mercy.
There is no certainty that the thief on the cross was not baptized. There is a story that he was what became of the rich young man, who may well have been baptized by the apostles (Jn. 3:22).1st formost saved by gods grace and our faith
-Jesus says must be born of water and spirit . John3:5
-NT shows a water baptism in river “in Jesus name” (can’t think of verse)
-Paul differentiates baptism in John from baptism in Jesus name .acts19:3
god can work outside of sacrament
hence
catholic understanding of baptism by desire (thief on cross) and martyrdom
It’s a safe bet that he wasn’t baptised in a traditional sense, so I’m really not feeling warm and fuzzy with that argument. That doesn’t mean Christ him self didn’t baptism him while right there on the cross. Remember, traditional water baptism is just one form of baptism, and God has others. For instance another form is Blood Baptism, if you’ve never been formally baptised but lets say, the spirit came to you, you accept the truth and all of the sudden you find your self being martyred for the faith before you’ve been (traditionally) baptised. Your death (your blood) is a form of baptism. This, strictly speaking isn’t the case for that theif, he wasn’t being executed for the faith he was being executed for his sin. But there is another form, a Baptism of Desire, the theif here would fall rather neatly in this category wouldn’t you say?There is no certainty that the thief on the cross was not baptized. There is a story that he was what became of the rich young man, who may well have been baptized by the apostles (Jn. 3:22).