Scandal witnessed during Communion

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fraz94
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
It is wrong. It is likely a mistake.

His role would have been to graciously welcome them, and walk them to the priest of whom he told the problem.

Not to discourage baptism, not to say when they ask to see a priest “oh he’s looking for you you can’t receive communion! Wait till he lays in on you!”

As I said this person has no problem giving communion to his sinner "friends ". He is missing the plank in his own eye.
Haha your last sentence made me laugh- my “sinner friends” would be practising members of the Roman Catholic Church- maybe they are coming to Communion without the proper preparation but at least they are members of the Catholic Church- the Catholic Church firmly teaches that those outside her Communion may not receive!
 
Haha your last sentence made me laugh- my “sinner friends” would be practising members of the Roman Catholic Church- maybe they are coming to Communion without the proper preparation but at least they are members of the Catholic Church- the Catholic Church firmly teaches that those outside her Communion may not receive!
And also teaches that those in mortal sin "profane the body of The Lord " by partaking.

Now how many people using birth control, do you give communion to. To name one mortal sin.
 
And also teaches that those in mortal sin "profane the body of The Lord " by partaking.

Now how many people using birth control, do you give communion to. To name one mortal sin.
Couldn’t agree with you more my friend! It is very wrong of people not in the correct state to go to Communion, yet sadly many people are teaching that it is okay to go no matter what. I don’t agree with them, but firstly those who go to Communion must be members of the Catholic Church- that is the most vital thing, people cannot receive Communion multiple times at Mass even if they are the Holiest person there- I understand and thank you for your comment, but in all honesty I had no wrong or bad intention- many Priests and Ministers, even Religious and Laity would have been very harsh on that poor man if they saw what had happened. I alerted the Father (as he told me to inform him of these things, as in the past when we had a lady taking the host away and putting it in handbag - since then he asked me and all the Ministers to keep a close eye) and I said very kindly to the lady that her partner should not receive Communion- not as many people seem to have understood that I said it in a nasty or very unkind way. God bless you!
 
Christ Himself said that he who eats His flesh and drinks His blood without discerning the body, eats and drinks damnation upon himself. Even if done in ignorance, this is scandalous as it is desecration to the body of Christ.
 
Christ Himself said that he who eats His flesh and drinks His blood without discerning the body, eats and drinks damnation upon himself. Even if done in ignorance, this is scandalous as it is desecration to the body of Christ.
Amen. Thank you for posting!
 
I think all too often we automatically assume the bad instead of the good because the bad is usually the case in our society. It seems as if the man and his partner were probably confused and didn’t know what to do; however, no one will really know what they were thinking. After you told the priest about the incident, I wouldn’t have included the snide remark to the man’s girlfriend. That wasn’t necessary, and like many above said, it scares people away sometimes.

If you see them at Mass next time, just be happy that they chose to come to Mass. They could have gone in thousands of spiritual directions, but they chose this one, and we should be grateful for that.
 
It appears that many are criticizing the OP for his actions.

What I find confusing is that years ago, at least, almost everyone, whether Catholic or Protestant knew who could receive Holy Communion and only once during Mass. From my understanding the rules have changed and one can go to two masses and receive twice in one day.

My point I guess is, it appears that people in general have become very ignorant and I guess I would not be so understanding as some seem to be towards this couple. If one is Catholic they should know the rules regarding reception of the Holy Communion and if one is not Catholic it is difficult to imagine one would go up three times to receive Communion. Most non Catholics are uncomfortable when attending a Catholic Mass as they don’t know what is actually happening. I know that if I attend a protestant church, I would try to follow the service by observing others, however, know that taking their communion is not allowed and also wouldn’t go up for an altar call.

No one on CAF knows what was really going on in this man’s thinking and can’t judge him in a positive or a negative light. If one really accepts the Churches teaching on the Eucharist, then we know that receiving His Body and Blood without discerning or unworthy is damning their selves. What the OP did was out of concern for Christ’s Body and also I assume for the man’s own soul least we forget what the Catholic Church teaches about the Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity of Jesus Christ in the Eucharist.

Yours in the Hearts of Jesus and Mary

Bernadette
 
Wait a sec.
The problem is that he went up three times–right?
You don’t mean he shouldn’t go up at all, do you???

It sounds like he went up the third time for his daughter, not himself…but since the priest gave it to him instead, he just took it not knowing what else to do and not realizing the priest didn’t recognize him as already being up.

I really think you should ask them if they are married or not before you call them “partners”–especially because it sounds as tho you said it in a derogatory way to her (sorry if i am misinterpreting this, but your addition of the CAPS made it seem so).

For all you know, they are both Catholic and married in a Catholic church.
How was it “clear” that they are not married and not Catholic?
He may have not gone to church much his entire life and just doesn’t know the etiquette.

.
You have understood rightly- he went up three times. He certainly was not a Catholic, he didn’t make the sign of the Cross at all and sat down during the Gospel and the Consecration- I am not “judging” him for that but it is a clear indication that he is not Catholic, and his actions at Communion would be an indication of that- afterwards in the Sacristy Father called him extremely Ignorant and said he had had words with him , but I don’t know what he said and he is a wonderful Priest so I know he would have done it kindly and gently. Although many Priests would have been quite strong in their rebuke. The couple were clearly not married,- I was not judging them just stating the fact- it was obvious, they were quite young and neither had wedding rings (and well I think most people would have realised that, it is not being judgemental just taking note) my Priest is very loving but very strict on the fact that couples who have children and are unmarried mustn’t come to Communion (if he knows the situation) until they are married.
 
Perhaps but the OP clearly showed his attitude as incredulous, and angry/upset.

He said his response to being asked “Excuse me can I speak to a priest” was not “sure hi how are you,” but instead “you can’t receive communion!”

Really? This is unacceptable. I’d say more unacceptable than what happened in the communion line.

I am pretty sure, hopefully I’m wrong, but I’d guess the woman heard the OP exactly the way I described regardless of the exact words, the message was “you aren’t welcome here.”

Imagine if this had been done:

Woman: “excuse me but can I speak to a priest”

OP: "sure I can walk with you to find him "

Woman: “oh thank you so much, we are new and need to talk to him about some things.”

OP: "well, welcome! I noticed your husband took your daughter for communion, I hope being told no didn’t upset you. It’s just since we believe that the Eucharist is truly the body and blood of Christ we reserve it for baptized Catholics only and children don’t receive it until they have some classes at elementary school age. "

Woman: "oh I had no idea , thank you. He’s not my husband just my boyfriend. We wanted to look into coming back to the church and having our daughter baptized. "

OP: " well I know father can help you through all of that, and I am happy to help you in any way I can as well. I’m so glad you came to our parish. "

Woman: “Thank you!!”

OP: "father, this is ‘Jill’, her and her boyfriend had a little misunderstanding in the communion line today and they also want to talk to you about returning to the church and baptizing their daughter. "

Such a conversation would have set a welcoming tone of friendship while addressing every concern and most importantly helping the couple come back to learn the faith.

An opportunity was missed.

OP let us know if you ever see them again!
Agreed.
OP, I know you from your posts to be a very loving and devout disciple.
But those remarks were way above your pay scale.
It’s the Priest’s duty and responsibility to tend to these things. You informed him. That’s it.
It’s the priest’s place to deal with it as he deems appropriate, which may never be discussed with you.
As one poster said, Jesus can take care of Himself. Good that you love and respect Christ in His True Presence, but you quite possibly have done much more harm than good.
You’re wearing too many hats. Remember you are a lay person. Bringing it to the forum seems a bit self-serving. I’m sure you’re a bit surprised more people didn’t say BRAVO! Good for you!
Apologize as one poster said. And step back into the shadows.
This is not just something that happened in your life. This happens when people begin to think that their role is paramount at the church. I know of a Sacristan that arrives 3 hours before liturgy, puts around all day, moves boxes from one place to another, and feels like the “keeper” of all the parishioners, their children, the employees, and yes, even Father.
The people that keep the parish running are essential, but are not to get too attached and possessive of their “roles”. This is what Pope Francis meant when he said that the role of the clergy is within the church, and the role of the laity is in the world. When we hang on to our “ministries” obsessively, we begin to lose perspective. In fact, it’s kind of a pet peeve of mine…everyone it seems has a “ministry”. No one just vacuums the carpet anymore or empties the candle box. it’s all “MY ministry”.

Take a deep breath, and know that God has it all in hand. And give your Pastor a break already. He knows how to handle these things and much more.

God bless you for your devotion and diligence. But chill. :cool:
 
It appears that many are criticizing the OP for his actions.

What I find confusing is that years ago, at least, almost everyone, whether Catholic or Protestant knew who could receive Holy Communion and only once during Mass. From my understanding the rules have changed and one can go to two masses and receive twice in one day.

My point I guess is, it appears that people in general have become very ignorant and I guess I would not be so understanding as some seem to be towards this couple. If one is Catholic they should know the rules regarding reception of the Holy Communion and if one is not Catholic it is difficult to imagine one would go up three times to receive Communion. Most non Catholics are uncomfortable when attending a Catholic Mass as they don’t know what is actually happening. I know that if I attend a protestant church, I would try to follow the service by observing others, however, know that taking their communion is not allowed and also wouldn’t go up for an altar call.

No one on CAF knows what was really going on in this man’s thinking and can’t judge him in a positive or a negative light. If one really accepts the Churches teaching on the Eucharist, then we know that receiving His Body and Blood without discerning or unworthy is damning their selves. What the OP did was out of concern for Christ’s Body and also I assume for the man’s own soul least we forget what the Catholic Church teaches about the Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity of Jesus Christ in the Eucharist.

Yours in the Hearts of Jesus and Mary

Bernadette
Thank you so much dear Bernadette, you have truly understood why I did what I did and the genuine reasons and intentions for it. People have remarked and called me judgemental but I only had the Dignity of the Eucharist at mind and heart.
 
It appears that many are criticizing the OP for his actions.

What I find confusing is that years ago, at least, almost everyone, whether Catholic or Protestant knew who could receive Holy Communion and only once during Mass. From my understanding the rules have changed and one can go to two masses and receive twice in one day.

My point I guess is, it appears that people in general have become very ignorant and I guess I would not be so understanding as some seem to be towards this couple. If one is Catholic they should know the rules regarding reception of the Holy Communion and if one is not Catholic it is difficult to imagine one would go up three times to receive Communion. Most non Catholics are uncomfortable when attending a Catholic Mass as they don’t know what is actually happening. I know that if I attend a protestant church, I would try to follow the service by observing others, however, know that taking their communion is not allowed and also wouldn’t go up for an altar call.

No one on CAF knows what was really going on in this man’s thinking and can’t judge him in a positive or a negative light. If one really accepts the Churches teaching on the Eucharist, then we know that receiving His Body and Blood without discerning or unworthy is damning their selves. What the OP did was out of concern for Christ’s Body and also I assume for the man’s own soul least we forget what the Catholic Church teaches about the Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity of Jesus Christ in the Eucharist.

Yours in the Hearts of Jesus and Mary

Bernadette
And as I pointed out several times, correction can be handed out appropriately. The person had already consumed the Eucharist, perhaps you’d advocate stomach pumping I don’t know, but anyway it was done.

The OP should handle this with grace and a welcoming heart, guiding them to truth rather than scolding.

Indeed, if they are run out of the church they will be damned, which is far graver than lovingly pastoring them to correct them and guiding them into the church where they can confess and be reconciled.

It also seems that this OP considers himself a “de facto” Deacon since his priest is elderly. It seems he is way over stepping his bounds. IMO. This is a matter for him to address the priest with and then just hand out communion.

Also, regarding Protestant churches everyone is welcome to communion there so most Protestants don’t know they can’t take communion in a Catholic Church. Second, the orthodox commune infants so perhaps they are if that background.

Regardless, there are lots of people out there that have no idea of the church’s Eucharistic teaching.
 
Agreed.
OP, I know you from your posts to be a very loving and devout disciple.
But those remarks were way above your pay scale.
It’s the Priest’s duty and responsibility to tend to these things. You informed him. That’s it.
It’s the priest’s place to deal with it as he deems appropriate, which may never be discussed with you.
As one poster said, Jesus can take care of Himself. Good that you love and respect Christ in His True Presence, but you quite possibly have done much more harm than good.
You’re wearing too many hats. Remember you are a lay person. Bringing it to the forum seems a bit self-serving. I’m sure you’re a bit surprised more people didn’t say BRAVO! Good for you!
Apologize as one poster said. And step back into the shadows.
This is not just something that happened in your life. This happens when people begin to think that their role is paramount at the church. I know of a Sacristan that arrives 3 hours before liturgy, puts around all day, moves boxes from one place to another, and feels like the “keeper” of all the parishioners, their children, the employees, and yes, even Father.
The people that keep the parish running are essential, but are not to get too attached and possessive of their “roles”. This is what Pope Francis meant when he said that the role of the clergy is within the church, and the role of the laity is in the world. When we hang on to our “ministries” obsessively, we begin to lose perspective. In fact, it’s kind of a pet peeve of mine…everyone it seems has a “ministry”. No one just vacuums the carpet anymore or empties the candle box. it’s all “MY ministry”.

Take a deep breath, and know that God has it all in hand. And give your Pastor a break already. He knows how to handle these things and much more.

God bless you for your devotion and diligence. But chill. :cool:
Thank you and God bless you, you are a good person and Jesus loves you.
 
And as I pointed out several times, correction can be handed out appropriately. The person had already consumed the Eucharist, perhaps you’d advocate stomach pumping I don’t know, but anyway it was done.

The OP should handle this with grace and a welcoming heart, guiding them to truth rather than scolding.

Indeed, if they are run out of the church they will be damned, which is far graver than lovingly pastoring them to correct them and guiding them into the church where they can confess and be reconciled.

It also seems that this OP considers himself a “de facto” Deacon since his priest is elderly. It seems he is way over stepping his bounds. IMO. This is a matter for him to address the priest with and then just hand out communion.

Also, regarding Protestant churches everyone is welcome to communion there so most Protestants don’t know they can’t take communion in a Catholic Church. Second, the orthodox commune infants so perhaps they are if that background.

Regardless, there are lots of people out there that have no idea of the church’s Eucharistic teaching.
Yes but the Orthodox have a great love and reverence for the Holy Eucharist, I have spent time in an Orthodox country doing charity work and have experienced this first hand. As you said earlier about being in the proper state- the Orthodox are very good at this and generally know the need for a good Confession before Communion- they are like how it was in our Church a few years ago. The Orthodox are also very good at making the sign of the Cross (from right to left) and do so hundreds of times during the Liturgy- they certainly weren’t Orthodox- I would wager all my life savings on that ha!

I do not consider myself as practically a Deacon- I do a lot to help but by no means do I see myself as ruler of the parish or in charge of the Priest as was previously suggested- I find that insulting when all I had in mind was the dignity of the Eucharist.
 
I wasn’t saying you are being judgmental, just jumping to conclusions. Many married couples don’t wear rings–I don’t.
And as I said, he may have not gone to church much in his past so he does not know the way everyone else goes thru the rituals.
And Catholics often marry young, don’t they?

Did the priest find out if they are married/Catholic when he “had words” with him?
He must have asked, right?

.
Yes Father told me he had spoken to the man in question and that the couple were not married and that they would need a serious amount of instruction before he would consider Baptising the child- he also called the man extremely ignorant- in quite an abrupt tone.

You are right many Catholics do marry young and this is a beautiful thing, and thank God when they do.
 
It’s a beautiful thing when couples love each other and want to get married when they are not young, too.

.
Yes- marriage is such a beautiful Sacrament- I most likely won’t experience it myself as I am in the process of serving God in a Religious Order.
 
What did the Pope say about Pride? lol
Here’s what the CCC says.

vatican.va/archive/ENG0015/__P8K.HTM

2477 Respect for the reputation of persons forbids every attitude and word likely to cause them unjust injury.277 He becomes guilty:
  • of rash judgment who, even tacitly, assumes as true, without sufficient foundation, the moral fault of a neighbor;
  • of detraction who, without objectively valid reason, discloses another’s faults and failings to persons who did not know them;278
  • of calumny who, by remarks contrary to the truth, harms the reputation of others and gives occasion for false judgments concerning them.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top