School Vouchers and Catholic Schools

  • Thread starter Thread starter CPA2
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Realize first here that GH is just an expressive and passionate person. You should see him in action on any Episcopal Church USA thread! Don’t get turned off just by his tone. He’s not yelling, just passionate.

All that said Gurney, you are stereotyping far worse than any of the teachers union critics here ever have. I agree with your point that a serious problem at many private schools is the phenomenon of rich, spoiled brats. Kids like that are just as destuctive of the learning environment as the crack kids are. Unlike the crack kids, that environment CAN be directly laid at the feet of the public school system. Is it any wonder that mostly rich kids are at private schools when the public school system is ripping me off to the tune of 2.2% of the total value of my house every year? Who can afford to pay both that AND private tuition that amounts to ANOTHER 2% of the value of my house EVERYyear?

I attended both catholic and public schools growing up. My wife did her student teaching in an urban public school district and saw many of the same things Gurney describes among the students. Unlike what Gurney describes, my experience and my wife’s is the OPPOSITE. The destructive kids set the tone. Why, I don’t know. Put the “jerks” (to use the brutal description of someone else) in the classroom (whether rick/spoiled or poor/neglected) and THEY are the leaders. Achievement becomes something to be mocked and derided (behind the teacher’s back, of course). “Bad” becomes the new good. The public school system (largely through no fault of the teachers, actually), has forfeited any effective means of combatting this self destructive student culture. Only private schools retain the ability to throw out suspend and expell students who consistently ruin the learning environment. And it only works in private schools if the administration is so inclined and the finances allow them to toss even rich kids.

I don’t know how to help the kids whose parents have ruined them to date. Unlike some others, I don’t claim to have all the answers. But I AM sure that the answer is NOT to adopt a “lowest common denominator” approach to education where mediocrity for all is deemed better than excellence for some and failure for others. We’ve got rather enough mediocrity and not enough excellence in this country already, thanks. Instead let’s make excellence AVAILABLE to all and let those who are able achieve it.

My kids’ catholic school is incredible. Yes, they have fundraisers and auctions and even auction off prime parking spots. What Gurney fails to recognize is that this money goes to keep tuition under control and fund scholarships for less wealthy families (the ones that otherwise coun’t pay for BOTH the public and private schools). I frankly don’t resent them their parking spot for the extra $2,000 bucks they kicked in voluntarily. And in our case, it changes nothing. The kids all wear the same uniforms. They attend mass daily and confession monthly. Their teachers are committed catholics that both teach and live the faith. The priests visit the classrooms and know the kids by name (no small feat!). They also learn their virtues, devotions and generosity. I’m sure there are spoiled brats present. But they don’t run the place, of that I’ve made sure.

Opponents of vouchers always like to paint a doomsday scenario. It’s nonsense. All you have to do to prevent major and immediate disruption is to phase the voucher in slowly like I said above. Gradually increase it in a way that benefits BOTH the public district AND the parents who want private schools.
 
manualman, I agree with your assessment of Catholic schools, and do feel that GH’s perspective on them is somewhat slanted or even a stereotype. I sent my own children to Catholic schools because they were far better than the enculturation of the worst in contemporary society that I saw in the publics. Vouchers (although I still believe they would be subject to a court fight, and may lose there) would be beneficial for those whose children are attractive to private schools, for a variety of reasons. If activated, vouchers would release private school families from paying for publics. However, they will not necessarily make signficant impact on the public school environments – except possibly to segment these schools even more (one area where I do agree with GH).

The factor that makes this likely is that of free enterprise and school admissions. As you obviously know, private educational institutions can choose whatever criteria for admission they choose, within federal/state minimal regulations (such as non-discrimination on race). They can de-select on any number of factors, including one’s personal family background/family status, including a particular student’s behavior history, academic performance history (even aside form standardized testing for admissions), and much more. That is even before they get in the door, let alone the options of suspension, expulsion, and retention were they to be admitted.

[An aside, somewhat O/T: I don’t think it’s necessarily “bad” that this tends also to keep Special Ed kids in publics, as long as those SpEd kids are being quite well-served in publics, by professionals who really know what they’re doing (are well-trained), have the tools they need, the conditions they need to deliver excellent services to those students. That’s a big If. Some schools, and some classrooms, do a better job of that than others. However, from the point of view of Catholic schools, it’s not necessarily a good thing to have a *de facto elimination of SpEd kids, as both those students and the “normal” students can benefit from these interactions. Just an aside.]

But in terms of reform of the public school environment – which is a different issue than taxpayer equity – what will change that most effectively is when the public abandons the school sites, by whatever alternative legal means: chartering (site & homeschool charters), private or self-homeschooling, or private site schools. But that has to be a massive exodus, and vouchers will not achieve such a massive exodus, because there are not enough private school sites to seat such exiting students. Basically the current system has to disintegrate due to lack of attendance, in order for there to be radical change.
 
Realize first here that GH is just an expressive and passionate person. You should see him in action on any Episcopal Church USA thread! Don’t get turned off just by his tone. He’s not yelling, just passionate.
Yeah, but as a parent, I can’t help but think, “What if this guy was my kid’s history teacher, with such incredible charged rhetoric about things I do not agree on?” That is the stereotype he reinforces.
Who can afford to pay both that AND private tuition that amounts to ANOTHER 2% of the value of my house EVERYyear?
I am in the same boat. About 10% of my income goes to tutition on top of that tax, and I can not even deduct it from my tax debt.
Opponents of vouchers always like to paint a doomsday scenario. It’s nonsense. All you have to do to prevent major and immediate disruption is to phase the voucher in slowly like I said above. Gradually increase it in a way that benefits BOTH the public district AND the parents who want private schools.
Yes, and I said something like this earlier. We must not destroy public education or abandon school debt.
 
I don’t know what the answer is in regards to troublesome students. I’m not convinced that good teachers can ever substitute for good parents. But I am convinced that any solution that attempts to help these kids at the expense of the good ones is a bad idea.

This is a whole separate issue from special ed, mind you. I do believe that special ed and private education CAN be compatible. In my mind, the public school district needs to have assistance based on the diagnosed needs of the child, regardless of what school he goes to. For example, I have homeschooling friends with a dyslexic son. The public school system (after some legal threatening) conceded that they had the right to the same sorts of specialized attention that the regular public school kids get when not in their “mainstreamed” classrooms. In other words, he goes in for the same 2 days a week of extra attention and does his other 3 days of classroom workload at his homeschool.

Again, this does NOT have to be a one time massive conversion and uprooting of the entire world. If you don’t like the word “voucher” you start with a local District tax credit of modest size calculated to fill up the existing private school capacity while actually enhancing the public school District funding level per remaining student. After a couple years of this, it may well be that more private schools will open. Many evangelicals are interested in opening schools as are muslims and Jews. Only the severe penalty of double paying for education stops them. Ease that penalty slowly over time and everybody wins.

This would be ESPECIALLY mutually beneficial in areas of overcrowded public schools that are scrambling for expansion money. My public school district is chronically overcrowded, uses mobile trailers for classrooms routinely and yet a catholic school that has been struggling for YEARS within modest driving distance closed down this year. Now those schools will be even MORE crowded.
 
The highest ACT scores were in 1963, the year that prayer was taken out of public schools… ACT scores have been going down every since.
So you’re suggesting that these facts are related? Good Lord, that downslide happened fast!
 
So you’re suggesting that these facts are related? Good Lord, that downslide happened fast!
There seems to be more than a casual relationship between socialism, which admits that there is no God equal to or above socialism, and the failure of government schools. Remember, the number one problem in government schools is discipline.

The philosophy of socialism is failure and the gospel of socialism is envy. (Winston Churchill).
 
We must not destroy public education or abandon school debt.
The impact of school vouchers on public schools: “The threat to public schools arises from their defects, not their accomplishments. In small, closely knit communities where public schools, particularly elementary schools, are now reasonably satisfactory, not even the most comprehensive voucher plan would have much effect…But elsewhere, and particularly in the urban slums where the public schools are doing such a poor job, most parents would undoubtedly try to send their children to nonpublic schools.”
 
There seems to be more than a casual relationship between socialism, which admits that there is no God equal to or above socialism, and the failure of government schools. Remember, the number one problem in government schools is discipline.

The philosophy of socialism is failure and the gospel of socialism is envy. (Winston Churchill).
Just curious: If you could reinstate school prayer, what prayer would it be?
 
I would ask that you not start a tit for tat argument of the qualities of private schools vs public schools.
I can assure you that there are many more on this message board that will cite numerous experiences that run directly contrary to yours.
There are also many that have experiences highlighting the failure of public education.
I myself can cite many examples from my own career in school.

All you are going to end up with is a full thread of anecdotal evidence and nothing addressing vouchers. Perhaps that is your intent?🤷

Why should I be forced to pay out for a system that I do not utilize, do not believe in, and is failing kids?
Using your analogy, why should I be forced to pay school taxes when I have no children in school? My family gains nothing from paying school taxes since we don’t utilize the system.

Peace
 
Using your analogy, why should I be forced to pay school taxes when I have no children in school? My family gains nothing from paying school taxes since we don’t utilize the system.

Peace
That argument is weak. I am not a senior citizen… why should my local tax dollars support a senior center? I never call the police. Can’t I get a credit? Of course not.

Even if you don’t have kids, a good school system adds to the value of the community, which is reflected in the value of your property.

A much better argument is: I spend my money on a comparable service, thus I am not “opting out” of education, and shouldn’t have to pay twice.
 
That argument is weak. I am not a senior citizen… why should my local tax dollars support a senior center? I never call the police. Can’t I get a credit? Of course not.

Even if you don’t have kids, a good school system adds to the value of the community, which is reflected in the value of your property.

A much better argument is: I spend my money on a comparable service, thus I am not “opting out” of education, and shouldn’t have to pay twice.
The thing is, many towns/villages/hamlets don’t have a senior citizen center or if they do its not funded by tax payer dollars. Many of them, where I live, meet in Churches or volunteer fire halls, etc.

Even though you never call the police, you actually utilize the system because they are patrolling your town and protecting you and your property and as such you are indirectly utilizing their services.

Personally if someone wants to send their child to private school, whether religious or non-religious, that’s their own business, however they should continue to pay school tax. I just don’t want tax payer monies (vouchers, etc) going towards any religious based schools because I believe that by doing that, its government supporting religion and I’m strictly opposed to that.
 
Personally if someone wants to send their child to private school, whether religious or non-religious, that’s their own business, however they should continue to pay school tax. I just don’t want tax payer monies (vouchers, etc) going towards any religious based schools because I believe that by doing that, its government supporting religion and I’m strictly opposed to that.
How do you feel, then, about students using Pell grants to go to schools like Notre Dame, and how would that differ from a similar program for High School students?
 
I just don’t want tax payer monies (vouchers, etc) going towards any religious based schools because I believe that by doing that, its government supporting religion and I’m strictly opposed to that.
I don’t want my money going to many government organization including some public schools. So what? I do not have a chance to choose. All I want is equity and fairness.
 
I don’t want my money going to many government organization including some public schools. So what? I do not have a chance to choose. All I want is equity and fairness.
And in this case, that being?
 
And in this case, that being?
The parent of a child having the greatest say in how a child is raised and educated. That each child receive some help, if not the same, from tax funds dedicated toward that purpose. School taxes are not yours alone. All pay into the system. It is ridiculous that parents then can get zero help.

Imagine if Social Security benefits were controlled through a central housing and feeding system to prevent any funds going to a Church.
 
The parent of a child having the greatest say in how a child is raised and educated. That each child receive some help, if not the same, from tax funds dedicated toward that purpose. School taxes are not yours alone. All pay into the system. It is ridiculous that parents then can get zero help.

Imagine if Social Security benefits were controlled through a central housing and feeding system to prevent any funds going to a Church.
I recognize that school taxes are not mine alone, nor are they yours alone; they are collected for the common good of the people. But in all fairness, i’d greatly object to monies being spent on any non-public school as I believe all monies should stay in the public sector.

Btw, there are scholarships available for children wanting to attend private schools from non-government sources, so parents can always reach out to them for funding.
 
I recognize that school taxes are not mine alone, nor are they yours alone; they are collected for the common good of the people. But in all fairness, i’d greatly object to monies being spent on any non-public school as I believe all monies should stay in the public sector.
So great! Let’s not collect any taxes for schools so that no money goes to some place that might be a problem for someone else. Or let us collect only enough to help those children who need help. That way I do not have to pay taxes to educate my child, then lose control over my own money.
 
So great! Let’s not collect any taxes for schools so that no money goes to some place that might be a problem for someone else. Or let us collect only enough to help those children who need help. That way I do not have to pay taxes to educate my child, then lose control over my own money.
Thanks for your response.

Given your analolgy, if we collect no taxes for schools; then what is your solution to educating children irrespective of their religion if any.

I’m having difficulty trying to figure out what your point is.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top