Scripture: Why does the CC having made it 'canon' mean the CC is what it claims?

  • Thread starter Thread starter JoyToBeCatholic
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
How does the bible exercise its authority? If you have a doctrinal dispute with your brother, do you both go to a place where the bible is perhaps placed on a lectern, and recite your respective understandings of doctrine, then wait for it to speak, deciding between the two of you?
I would assume that “the church” would refer to more than just the magesterium, and this person would have to face his whole community of spiritual brethren. Collectively, and assuming you are in a church that obey’s God’s Word, the people (laypeople and clergy) would try to reason with the erring brother* using God’s Word.*

I would like to pose this question (not just to you, Jim):

If there is a “God’s Word” (post-Apostolic) other than the Bible, then what is the “sword” of the mouth of Jesus that He will “fight” with in Rev 2:16? The church?

Heb 4:12For the word of God is quick, and powerful, and sharper than any twoedged sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart.

That is a wicked description; surely sounds like a fight. Is Jesus saying that the church is going to do this?

When people tell me the Word of God is not JUST the Bible, it must mean that the church is somehow the Word of God, or the Bible is only SOME of the Word of God and the church is the rest…

There is only one Word of God that I know of (other than Jesus; the Word made flesh). I’ve never seen anything coming from the church that is as “quick”, “powerful”, “sharp” or “piercing” as Scripture is.
 
I would assume that “the church” would refer to more than just the magesterium, and this person would have to face his whole community of spiritual brethren. Collectively, and assuming you are in a church that obey’s God’s Word, the people (laypeople and clergy) would try to reason with the erring brother* using God’s Word.*
It sounds then as if it is really the community which is exercising its authority, rather than the book. And what if the individual members of the community differ?
 
It sounds then as if it is really the community which is exercising its authority, rather than the book. And what if the individual members of the community differ?
I don’t think they would all be members of the same congregation if they didn’t all believe the same things. Do you?
 
Actually, I do know of cases where no one seems to agree on anything (within one congregation). Usually these people are “non-denominational”. I wouldn’t choose to worship in a congregation like that.

I’m not opposed to a creed. They should all be “of one mind” and “speak the same things”.
 
It sounds then as if it is really the community which is exercising its authority, rather than the book.
No, I wouldn’t belong to a community that didn’t rely on the book.
 
I don’t think they would all be members of the same congregation if they didn’t all believe the same things. Do you?
Exactly. And if they interpreted a scripture differently from the rest, they might go off and begin their own congregation, preaching a different gospel, just as has occurred over and over since the reformation.
 
If there is a “God’s Word” (post-Apostolic) other than the Bible, then what is the “sword” of the mouth of Jesus that He will “fight” with in Rev 2:16? The church?

Heb 4:12For the word of God is quick, and powerful, and sharper than any twoedged sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart.

That is a wicked description; surely sounds like a fight. Is Jesus saying that the church is going to do this?

When people tell me the Word of God is not JUST the Bible, it must mean that the church is somehow the Word of God, or the Bible is only SOME of the Word of God and the church is the rest…

There is only one Word of God that I know of (other than Jesus; the Word made flesh). I’ve never seen anything coming from the church that is as “quick”, “powerful”, “sharp” or “piercing” as Scripture is.
Psalm 119:160 “Thy word is truth.”

John 17:17 “Consecrate them by the truth; thy word is truth.”

When the Bible writes “thy word is truth”, I don’t think that’s just the Bible saying the Bible is true–I think it means that God speaks truth–and truth is what God speaks.

Jesus says in John 17:14 “I have delivered thy word to them”–Jesus is not saying that He handed them the Bible-what He gave His apostles is truth. Just as the gospel of John calls Jesus “the word made flesh” it also calls Jesus “the truth”. God is Truth. His word is truth.

Truth cuts. Ephesians 6 tells of spirtual armour and verse 17 refers to the words that come from God as the sword. Yes, just as Revelation speaks of a fight because the “Church Militant” is most definately engaged in a spritual battle, and truth is our weapon.
 
My point had to do with how the bible itself is able to exercise authority, except through human beings? The book itself can not speak. It must be interpreted by its readers. And if there is no ongoing Church having its authority from Christ, the task becomes an impossibility. Every reader becomes his own authority, and as a result, unity goes out the window—a unity for which Christ fervently prayed at the Last Supper.
 
I
When people tell me the Word of God is not JUST the Bible, it must mean that the church is somehow the Word of God, or the Bible is only SOME of the Word of God and the church is the rest…

There is only one Word of God that I know of (other than Jesus; the Word made flesh). I’ve never seen anything coming from the church that is as “quick”, “powerful”, “sharp” or “piercing” as Scripture is.
A couple of examples of things from the Church I have found to be as quick, piercing and powerful as Scripture:

There are a set of writings by John Paul II that are collectively known as “The Theology of the Body.” They dramatically changed my life and the lives of many of my friends.

ANY time I want to (except this weekend) I can go to adoration and sit down wth Jesus for as long as I want.

Some weeks ago I spent a few minutes in a small room talking to an ordained Priest. Though my sins were as scarlet when I entered, they were washed clean when I left.

While in this condition I can partake of the actual, real, here-and-now body, blood soul and divinity of Christ the Lord.

It was more than putting writing in a canon 1700 years ago, the Word is here, in his Church, now, today.
 
I would like to pose this question (not just to you, Jim):

If there is a “God’s Word” (post-Apostolic) other than the Bible, then what is the “sword” of the mouth of Jesus that He will “fight” with in Rev 2:16? The church?

Heb 4:12For the word of God is quick, and powerful, and sharper than any twoedged sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart.

That is a wicked description; surely sounds like a fight. Is Jesus saying that the church is going to do this?

When people tell me the Word of God is not JUST the Bible, it must mean that the church is somehow the Word of God, or the Bible is only SOME of the Word of God and the church is the rest…

There is only one Word of God that I know of (other than Jesus; the Word made flesh). I’ve never seen anything coming from the church that is as “quick”, “powerful”, “sharp” or “piercing” as Scripture is.
Joy of Catholic:

Maybe this will help:

Let’s start with the citation from Hebrews, because I really believe you’ve misinterpreted the scripture, and The Message will help in pointing out your error:

Hebrews 4:12-23 The Message

God means what he says. What he says goes. His powerful Word is sharp as a surgeon’s scalpel, cutting through everything, whether doubt or defense, laying us open to listen and obey. Nothing and no one is impervious to God’s Word. We can’t get away from it—no matter what.

According to this translation, God’s Word is supposed to help lead the doubing to faith and to help convict us of our sin and disobedience. That hardly sounds like a violent process, unless you consider the discipline of a son or daughter by a loving Father to be violent.

And, here are the other Scriptures which refer to the Sword coming from Christ’s Mouth:

Revelation 1:9-17a The Message

*I, John, with you all the way in the trial and the Kingdom and the passion of patience in Jesus, was on the island called Patmos because of God’s Word, the witness of Jesus. It was Sunday and I was in the Spirit, praying. I heard a loud voice behind me, trumpet-clear and piercing: “Write what you see into a book. Send it to the seven churches: to Ephesus, Smyrna, Pergamum, Thyatira, Sardis, Philadelphia, Laodicea.” I turned and saw the voice. *

I saw a gold menorah
with seven branches,
And in the center, the Son of Man,
in a robe and gold breastplate,
hair a blizzard of white,
Eyes pouring fire-blaze,
both feet furnace-fired bronze,
His voice a cataract,
right hand holding the Seven Stars,
His mouth a sharp-biting sword,
his face a perigee sun.
I saw this and fainted dead at his feet. His right hand pulled me upright, his voice reassured me:


Revelation 19:11-16 The Message

Then I saw Heaven open wide—and oh! a white horse and its Rider. The Rider, named Faithful and True, judges and makes war in pure righteousness. His eyes are a blaze of fire, on his head many crowns. He has a Name inscribed that’s known only to himself. He is dressed in a robe soaked with blood, and he is addressed as “Word of God.” The armies of Heaven, mounted on white horses and dressed in dazzling white linen, follow him. A sharp sword comes out of his mouth so he can subdue the nations, then rule them with a rod of iron. He treads the winepress of the raging wrath of God, the Sovereign-Strong. On his robe and thigh is written, King of kings, Lord of lords.

In Catholic Teaching, the Word of God (when we’re not referring to Jesus Christ, who is the WORD OF GOD) refers to the whole deposit of Divine Revelation - The Sacred Scriptures and Tradition of the Church together. This was the understanding of the Church from the time of the Apostles and what allowed the Apostles’ successors to discern which books were faithful to the Gospel they received and the Faith they transmitted among the hundreds which were written from 50 AD to 150 AD.

Sometimes in these debates over the Bible as God’s Word, and in misunderstandings over the same, we forget that the real Saving Word of God is Jesus Christ, the Word of God who leapt down from his throne and became incarnate in the Virgins womb, and then condescended to be betrayed to evil men so that we could be saved from our sins and the penalty of eternal death.

Maybe, we should take some time out from our debates to thank and praise Him for this great and wondrous gift He has given us.

May all of you have a blessed Holy Week and an Easter spent worshipping the slain and risen Lord.

Your Brother in Christ, Michael
 
Just want to say thanks to everyone who contributed here. You’ve put a lot of effort into helping me see the Catholic p.o.v., for which I am very greatful. I’m going to lay-off posting on these threads for now. It’s getting harder for me to follow some of the responses in the original context b/c of the multiple dissections when cutting and pasting. (I’m not very good at this messaging thing :o ). It’s not so bad when I can respond shortly after someone else has replied to something, but I don’t have enough time to dedicate to this. I also feel like I’m going around in circles explaining how I see things which may be my fault for having 3 threads going at the same time. I will, however be looking back at this and reconsidering everyone’s p.o.v.

I will probably explore the Catholic and non-Catholic views of the New Covenant, Priesthood, Kingdom and that sort of thing next. Or I may start with the Papacy which ties into all of this. Not sure yet.

Anyway, thanks for all your insight and prayers!

God Bles You:grouphug:
 
I would assume that “the church” would refer to more than just the magesterium, and this person would have to face his whole community of spiritual brethren. Collectively, and assuming you are in a church that obey’s God’s Word, the people (laypeople and clergy) would try to reason with the erring brother* using God’s Word.*

I would like to pose this question (not just to you, Jim):

If there is a “God’s Word” (post-Apostolic) other than the Bible, then what is the “sword” of the mouth of Jesus that He will “fight” with in Rev 2:16? The church?

Heb 4:12For the word of God is quick, and powerful, and sharper than any twoedged sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart.

That is a wicked description; surely sounds like a fight. Is Jesus saying that the church is going to do this?

When people tell me the Word of God is not JUST the Bible, it must mean that the church is somehow the Word of God, or the Bible is only SOME of the Word of God and the church is the rest…

There is only one Word of God that I know of (other than Jesus; the Word made flesh). I’ve never seen anything coming from the church that is as “quick”, “powerful”, “sharp” or “piercing” as Scripture is.
The Church is the Bride of Christ. Jesus entrusted His word to His Apostles, and they faithfully handed it down, both orally and in writing. If you have not read anything that does not have these characteristics, then you have not read the catechism, or the teachings of the Magesterium. Why do you think most of Christendom resists the teachings of the Catholic Church? Including “Catholics”? They are hard.
 
It sounds then as if it is really the community which is exercising its authority, rather than the book. And what if the individual members of the community differ?
How does the bible exercise its authority? If you have a doctrinal dispute with your brother, do you both go to a place where the bible is perhaps placed on a lectern, and recite your respective understandings of doctrine, then wait for it to speak, deciding between the two of you?
No, I wouldn’t belong to a community that didn’t rely on the book.
Jim is giving a silly example here, but I think the point is that it boils down to how all the different people interpret the book, and it’s meanings. It is not as if the book itself speaks from the pulpit.
 
…Just want to say thanks to everyone who contributed here. You’ve put a lot of effort into helping me see the Catholic p.o.v., for which I am very greatful. I’m going to lay-off posting on these threads for now. …God Bles You:grouphug:
God bless you too. :grouphug: (Ooo! the new smiley–this is my first internet group hug!)

Have a blessed Holy Week, and may our Risen Lord renew your joy at Easter! :signofcross:
 
Jim is giving a silly example here, but I think the point is that it boils down to how all the different people interpret the book, and it’s meanings. It is not as if the book itself speaks from the pulpit.
Yes, that was my point exactly. Books cannot speak, or admonish, or correct, or explain. Books cannot exercise authority; only persons can.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top