I will re-post an older post of mine.
A person struggles with scruples - what ought they do?
A person with scrupulosity --ought to have a* “regular confessor”
who can direct them --and even give them some general principles* to follow -to apply (principles for them due to their particular scruples -they are usually not for those with a normal conscience).
Thus with their direction they can “dismiss scruples” (in the older language despise them) - “act against them”.
Scruples are to be dismissed ~ not argued with.
To borrow and image from a Carthusian from centuries ago: Scruples *are like a barking dog or a hissing goose -one does not stop to argue with a barking dog or a hissing goose does one? * No one keeps walking.
Such ‘obedience’ to a regular confessor who knows of ones scruples (except in what is manifest sin - such as if he told them it was ok to murder someone or something certain like that) is key. Such is the age old practice.
Also counseling - could be helpful depending on the case -but one would want to look for a counselor who can assist one in following the Churches Teachings - not go contrary to them (I have heard CA staff mention
catholictherapists.com/)
Here was a recent post from Jimmy Akin of CA that I saw in the Register and saved for those who struggle with such.
ncregister.com/blog/jimmy-akin/6-tools-for-the-scrupulous
Discuss with your confessor how you ought to confess due to scruples. For example he might tell you: First examine for any mortal sins. Or he might say “examine for # minutes for any mortal sins you are certain of”. Then one may take another 3-5 minutes to examine for venial sins one wishes to confess directly (say pick around 1-3) (remember venial sins do not need to be confessed though it is good to confess on a regular basis) and then end. Including any other sins or doubtful matters in general under “and all my sins” at the end…