E
Elizabeth502
Guest
Thanks to the priests here for your clarification.

If the spiritual director is a priest, then most likely he’s also the confessor. The Seal of Confession only applies to the actual Sacrament–however remember that the “seal” of the internal forum applies to spiritual direction and the director is still bound by a very high level of confidentiality. In the scenario you present, this would depend upon the relationship existing between the director and the directee. If those conversations often “change” (I keep wanting to write “morph” but that sounds odd) into outright confessions, then the Seal of confession would apply–especially if it does indeed become a confession.
Allow me to be a little more concrete. Let’s say that one has a relationship where the directee often begins by saying “I don’t know if this is a sin but…” and that conversation usually leads to an outright confession in the sense of the penitent saying “the sins I just mentioned a moment ago…” In that case, the seal would certainly apply because the entire spiritual session is one long extended confession.
In any case, the obligation to keep secrecy of the “internal forum” would apply–no question about it, regardless of what’s said or the circumstances.
The obligation to keep secrecy of the internal forum in either confession or spiritual direction is still absolute. The main difference is that the penalty for breaking the seal of confession is much greater–because the crime of violating it is greater. The other difference is that the spiritual director is permitted to reveal to a religious superior the fact that one had been attending direction, but without revealing any of the content; for example, a spiritual director in a seminary is permitted to say to the rector “yes, he attended last week” but nothing more, while a confessor is not even permitted to say “yes, he went to confession last week.”
Bottom line: yes, spiritual direction occurs in the internal forum and the secrecy of it cannot be violated.