The difference in my story is that I am an inquirer into Oriental Orthodoxy, not Eastern Orthodoxy. So I am unchurched not so much because I am unsure of where to go, but because there really isn’t anywhere to go locally where I could learn the faith as I would need to to join the church I am actually inquiring about.
May I ask why Oriental and not Eastern Orthodoxy?
So it is infinitely better to be uncomfortable than to be lukewarm, going through the motions in a church that you cannot believe in while your faith withers and dies from malnourishment. May God bless you in your journey. Remember that it is the journey of a lifetime, and at its conclusion (God willing) is salvation and eternity with God. That is worth all the pain in the world.
God bless you too on yours. And it sure is.
I sort of went through the same thing a while back and concluded that whatever problems may or may not exist in my little patch of the pie, that we were doing a pretty good job of living the message of Jesus Christ, both in our region and throughout the world. At least as good as any other church in my region. And in the end that is what mattered most to me.
I’m aware that all churches have their problems, their issues, their imperfections. I don’t have any real personal problems with people from that church.
I grew up Pentecostal, my father is ordained in the Assemblies of God (more properly, it’s Italian branch, the
Assemblee di Dio in Italia), so I can see where you’re coming from.
But I think an important component of being Christian - aside of course living your life in Christ, as you said - is knowing what you believe and why you believe it. And ultimately, living your life for Christ means accepting his teachings, in totality, no matter what they may be. I was always loyal to Pentecostalism in general because that’s how I was raised, and my parents were stigmatized by family, friends, and society (the charismatic movement of the 1970s was very new for Italians, there was no ‘Astuza Street Revival’ like in the States) when they left Catholicism for Pentecostalism. So it’s not something I take in lightly. I’m aware of what I’ve gotten myself into. I’m aware what ‘defection’ means. But I jumped in, so I can’t just walk out. I want to walk in a Christianity that is close as humanly possible to what Christ actually intended.
I’ve a passion for history. I have a personal theory that the key to understanding anything and everything is by studying its history. If Christianity really was corrupted and needed reform, then there must have been a period in which it was true, accurate, and pure. A corruption must have occurred then
several hundred years after its onset. To give a banal example - if Communion is purely symbolic, like the Assemblies of God teaches - then the early Church must have believed that, and a corruption like the real presence must have been an addition hundreds of years later.
It’s not so. Zwingli asserts the first real major defense of memoralism. That made me ask serious, serious questions. So while living our lives in a Christian way is an imperative (which I often fail), accuracy I feel is a must, too. Sound doctrine.