Sebelius: Decrease in Human Beings Will Cover Cost of Contraception Mandate

  • Thread starter Thread starter Scott_Lafrance
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
If Sebelius thinks there being less human beings is a good thing, why doesn’t she live by example.
 
Sebelius is clearly Malthusian in her desire for a zero growth society. Scrooge would be a fitting model for Sebelius;

forbes.com/2008/12/24/malthus-dickens-scrooge-oped-cx_jb_1224bowyer.html
Hitler’s hard eugenics and Sanger’s (founder of Planned Parenthood) softer one, both owed a great debt of gratitude to Thomas Malthus. So do the zero-growth, sustainable-growth, right-to-die, duty-to-die, life boat bio-ethicists who dominate so much of our intellectual discussion. Malthus turned out to be, ironically, right in some sense. His prediction of mass death has taken place; not because he was right, but because he was believed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top